ScalingStacks

[05UV]

Proof. It is clear that a Reedy weak equivalence between any two Segal spaces is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence.

Conversely, suppose f:U→Vf\colon U\rightarrow V is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence between complete Segal spaces. Then π0U0≈obU/∼\pi_{0}U_{0}\approx{\operatorname{ob}}U/{\sim} and π0V0≈obV/∼\pi_{0}V_{0}\approx{\operatorname{ob}}V/{\sim} by (6.5), so that π0​U0→π0​V0\pi_{0}U_{0}\rightarrow\pi_{0}V_{0} is a bijection. In the commutative diagram

U0\displaystyle{{U_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}U1\displaystyle{{U_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}U0×U0\displaystyle{{U_{0}\times U_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}V0\displaystyle{{V_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}V1\displaystyle{{V_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}V0×V0\displaystyle{{V_{0}\times V_{0}}}

the right-hand square is a homotopy pullback (since the induced maps of fibers are of the form mapU⁡(x,y)→mapV⁡(f​x,f​y)\map_{U}(x,y)\rightarrow\map_{V}(fx,fy), which is assumed to be a weak equivalence), and the large rectangle is a homotopy pullback (since by (6.4) the induced maps of fibers are of the form {hoequiv}U⁡(x,y)→{hoequiv}V⁡(f​x,f​y)\hoequiv_{U}(x,y)\rightarrow\hoequiv_{V}(fx,fy), which is also a weak equivalence). We conclude that U0→V0U_{0}\rightarrow V_{0} is a weak equivalence, and therefore that U1→V1U_{1}\rightarrow V_{1} is a weak equivalence. Since both UU and VV are Segal spaces, it follows that the map f:U→Vf\colon U\rightarrow V is a Reedy weak equivalence as desired. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

    Original source page 16

    Original source · math/9811037v3