The purpose of this section is to define a functorial Khovanov–Rozansky link homology for links in
abstract -manifolds (abstractly) diffeomorphic to , which is functorial under link cobordisms in
abstract -manifolds diffeomorphic to . The framework set up in this section
could have been developed immediately after the initial construction of functorial link invariants,
but to our knowledge it has not been developed in the literature. We hope that the careful presentation
of this improvement of the invariant will be a helpful warm-up for the following section, where we
employ a very similar strategy to build invariants of links in abstract 3-spheres.
Throughout this section, will denote a 3-ball: an oriented -manifold that is
diffeomorphic to via some (unspecified!) diffeomorphism.
We say a link embedding in is generic if it is in generic position with
respect to the projection along the -axis to and all crossings in the resulting link diagram
have distinct coordinates.
In this case, we consider the crossings as ordered from smallest to largest coordinate.
We say a link embedding in is blackboard-framed if the framing is parallel to .
0NAQ
Definition 4.2. Let be an oriented -manifold diffeomorphic to . We define
|
|
|
Given an embedded link , we define the subspace
|
|
|
and consider the bundle
of bigraded abelian groups, whose fiber at the point is
.
For a path in between points , we define the grading-preserving isomorphism
|
|
|
where the latter denotes the homomorphism associated to the trace of the link isotopy in
. This is well-defined by Theorem 2.4, even though
for some the embeddings can be highly non-generic with respect to projection in the
-coordinate. Also note that while Reidemeister I moves induce -grading shifts on the level of
, any isotopy of framed links features such moves in pairs, leading to a grading-preserving isomorphism.
Note that every diffeomorphism such that is generic and blackboard-framed
induces a grading-preserving isomorphism by evaluating sections at the point .
Remark. An alternative way to describe this definition is as follows.
Consider the groupoid with set of objects given by and with morphisms
given by paths modulo isotopies as in
Lemma 4.1. Then restricts to a functor from this
groupoid to bigraded abelian groups and is defined as its (co)limit.
0NAU
Definition 4.5. Consider a link cobordism in a 4-manifold diffeomorphic to .
Let and denote the boundary links in the incoming and outgoing
boundary 3-balls of . Then we define
|
|
|
in two steps. First we pick a
diffeomorphism , such that and are such that
and are both generic and blackboard-framed.
Then we declare
, for a flat section , to be the unique flat section of
with value:
|
|
|
0NAW
Proof. We first show independence of , given a fixed choice of
and . Suppose that is another
diffeomorphism restricting to and on and
respectively.
Lemma 4.7, proved below, implies that the link cobordisms and
are isotopic rel boundary in and we have
by Theorem 2.4.
Next we show independence of , given a fixed choice of .
Let be another diffeomorphism such that
is generic and blackboard-framed, and another diffeomorphism
restricting to on but still to on . Then, by
Lemma 4.1 (1), we can find a family connecting
to . By definition of parallel transport, we have:
|
|
|
Now we obtain a new diffeomorphism
and by the previous independence result and Theorem 2.4, we have:
|
|
|
Thus, the definition was independent of the choice of . An analogous argument
also establishes independence of the choice of .
∎
0NAX
Lemma 4.7. Let be a link cobordism
and let be a
diffeomorphism which restricts to the identity in a neighborhood of the boundary . Then is isotopic rel boundary to .
0NAY
Proof. The proof would be easy if we knew that were isotopic to the identity, but
is unknown. We can, however, replace with a
diffeomorphism which is isotopic (rel boundary) to , or replace with a diffeomorphism
which coincides with in a neighborhood of . In both cases, proving that is
isotopic to easily implies that is isotopic to .
Choose a point such that is disjoint from . There is no obstruction to
modifying (post-composing) by an isotopy which takes to , so we may
assume that restricts to the identity on .
(Note that this modification changes as well as , so there is no issue
of the image of getting “caught" on the image of .)
Next consider the tangent map of along . We would like to deform the tangent map to
the identity, but there is an obstruction living in . We can modify
(precompose) in a neighborhood of (and away from ) so that this obstruction
vanishes. (Specifically, let be a smooth function such that for
near 0 and for near 1. Let be a representative of the
nontrivial element of , with . Let be the unit ball
in , and for , let denote the distance from to the origin. Define a
diffeomorphism of by
|
|
|
This diffeomorphism is the identity near and it effects a full twist on the tangent space along
.)
Once the above obstruction vanishes we can isotope to a map which is the identity
on a neighborhood of .
Choose a family of diffeomorphisms , with , such
that is the identity, restricted to is the identity for all ,
and . The family of surfaces provides an isotopy from to . But is the identity on and , so . The family of surfaces provides an isotopy from to .
Composing these two isotopies provides the desired isotopy from to .
∎