ScalingStacks

4.2. Link homology in abstract 3-spheres

0NAZ

Definition 4.8. A link homology for links in 33-spheres is a functor

{link embeddings in oriented ​S≅S3link cobordisms in oriented Y≅S3×[0,1] up to isotopy rel ∂}→{bigraded abelian groupshomogeneous homomorphisms}\begin{Bmatrix}\textrm{link embeddings in oriented }S\cong S^{3}\\ \textrm{link cobordisms in oriented }Y\cong S^{3}\times{[0,1]}\textrm{ up to isotopy rel }\partial\end{Bmatrix}\xrightarrow{}\begin{Bmatrix}\textrm{bigraded abelian groups}\\ \textrm{homogeneous homomorphisms}\end{Bmatrix}
0NB0

Theorem 4.9. KhRN\mathrm{KhR}_{N} extends to a link homology theory for links in 33-spheres.

The proof occupies the remainder of this subsection.

Remark. In the proof of Theorem 4.9, we will show that the sweep-around property from Theorem 1.1 is sufficient to extend a link homology for links in 33-balls to 33-spheres, without using any special properties of KhRN\mathrm{KhR}_{N}.

0NB1

Definition 4.10. Let SS be an oriented 33-manifold diffeomorphic to S3S^{3}. For any point p∈S∖Lp\in S\setminus L, we consider LL as a link in the 33-ball S∖{p}S\setminus\{p\} and denote by π:T⁡(S,L)→S∖L\pi\colon T(S,L)\to S\setminus L the bundle of bigraded abelian groups, whose fiber at the point p∈S∖Lp\in S\setminus L is KhRN​(S∖{p},L)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(S\setminus\{p\},L) as defined in Definition 4.4.

For any path ptp_{t} in S∖LS\setminus L, we have that L×[0,1]⊂S×[0,1]∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1]≅ℝ3×[0,1]L\times{[0,1]}\subset S\times{[0,1]}\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}}\cong{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]}. By the results of §4.1, this cobordism induces a parallel transport isomorphism

(KhRN(pt):T(S,L)p0→T(S,L)p1)=defKhRN(S×[0,1]∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1],L×[0,1])(\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(p_{t})\colon T(S,L)_{p_{0}}\to T(S,L)_{p_{1}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{def}}}{{=}}\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(S\times{[0,1]}\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}},L\times{[0,1]})
0NB2

Lemma 4.11. The parallel transport isomorphisms KhRN​(pt)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(p_{t}) define a flat connection on T⁡(S,L)T(S,L).

0NB3

Proof. We have to show that the parallel transport isomorphisms associated to closed loops ptp_{t} in S∖LS\setminus L are identity maps. Suppose first that ptp_{t} is a contractible loop. Then the pair (S×[0,1]∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1],L×[0,1])(S\times{[0,1]}\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}},L\times{[0,1]}) is diffeomorphic to a pair (ℝ3×[0,1],Σ)({\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]},\Sigma) where Σ\Sigma is isotopic to an identity link cobordism, which implies that the parallel transport isomorphism KhRN​(pt)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(p_{t}) is the identity. This also implies that the parallel transport isomorphisms associated to isotopic paths between two points p0p_{0} and p1p_{1} in S∖LS\setminus L are equal. Now suppose that the loop ptp_{t} is a small meridian around a component of LL. Then the pair (S×[0,1]∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1],L×[0,1])(S\times{[0,1]}\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}},L\times{[0,1]}) is diffeomorphic to a pair (ℝ3×[0,1],Σ)({\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]},\Sigma) where Σ\Sigma is a sweep-around cobordism as in (1.1). By Theorem 1.1, it follows that the parallel transport isomorphism KhRN​(pt)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(p_{t}) is the identity. Since π1​(S∖L)\pi_{1}(S\setminus L) is generated by such small meridian loops, it follows that the parallel transport isomorphism for every loop ptp_{t} is the identity. ∎

0NB4

Definition 4.12. Let L⊂SL\subset S be a link embedded in a 3-sphere. Then we define the Khovanov–Rozansky homology of LL in SS to be

KhRN​(S,L)=defΓflat​(T⁡(S,L)),\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(S,L)\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{def}}}{{=}}\Gamma_{\textrm{flat}}(T(S,L)),

the bigraded abelian group of flat sections of the bundle T⁡(S,L)T(S,L).

Note that every point p∈S∖Lp\in S\setminus L induces a grading-preserving isomorphism

KhRN​(S,L)→KhRN​(S∖{p},L)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(S,L)\to\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(S\setminus\{p\},L)

of evaluating sections at the point pp.

0NB5

Definition 4.13. Consider a link cobordism Σ⊂W\Sigma\subset W in a 4-manifold WW diffeomorphic to S3×[0,1]S^{3}\times{[0,1]}. Let Σin⊂Win\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}\subset W_{\mathrm{in}} and Σout⊂Wout\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}}\subset W_{\mathrm{out}} denote the boundary links in the incoming and outgoing boundary 3-spheres of WW. Now we define

KhRN​(W,Σ):KhRN​(Win,Σin)→KhRN​(Wout,Σout)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W,\Sigma)\colon\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W_{\mathrm{in}},\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}})\to\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W_{\mathrm{out}},\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}})

by first choosing a path pt⊂W∖Σp_{t}\subset W\setminus\Sigma from p0∈Win∖Σinp_{0}\in W_{\mathrm{in}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}} to p1∈Wout∖Σoutp_{1}\in W_{\mathrm{out}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}}. Then we have W∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1]≅ℝ3×[0,1]W\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}}\cong{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]} and we declare KhRN​(W,Σ)​(η)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W,\Sigma)(\eta), for a flat section η∈KhRN​(Win,Σin)\eta\in\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W_{\mathrm{in}},\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}), to be the unique flat section of KhRN​(Wout,Σout)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W_{\mathrm{out}},\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}}) with value

KhRN​(W,Σ)​(η)​(pout)=KhRN​(W∖{(pt,t)}t∈[0,1],Σ)​(η⁡(pin))\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W,\Sigma)(\eta)(p_{\mathrm{out}})=\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W\setminus\{(p_{t},t)\}_{t\in{[0,1]}},\Sigma)(\eta(p_{\mathrm{in}}))
0NB6

Lemma 4.14. KhRN​(W,Σ)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W,\Sigma) is independent of the choice of the path ptp_{t}.

0NB7

Proof. Let us first fix a choice of endpoints p0∈Win∖Σinp_{0}\in W_{\mathrm{in}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}} and p1∈Wout∖Σoutp_{1}\in W_{\mathrm{out}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}}. Then any two choices of paths pt∈p_{t}\in and pt′p^{\prime}_{t} from p0p_{0} to p1p_{1} can be related by isotopy in W∖ΣW\setminus\Sigma or splicing in a little loop linking a component of Σ\Sigma. As before, isotopic paths give rise to isotopic surfaces in ℝ3×[0,1]{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]}, which induce equal maps. Similarly, in the case of a linking loop, we can choose a standard local model and then notice that the sweep-around property from Theorem 1.1 implies that the two paths induce the same map. Finally, the independence from the choice of endpoints p0∈Win∖Σinp_{0}\in W_{\mathrm{in}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}} and p1∈Wout∖Σoutp_{1}\in W_{\mathrm{out}}\setminus\Sigma_{\mathrm{out}} follows as in the proof of Lemma 4.6. ∎

This completes the proof of Theorem 4.9.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Scott Morrison, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:1907.12194v5