ScalingStacks

0NAV

Lemma 4.6. KhRN​(W,Σ)\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(W,\Sigma) is independent of the choices of ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}}, ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}} and ϕ\phi, and thus well-defined.

0NAW

Proof. We first show independence of ϕ\phi, given a fixed choice of ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}} and ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}}. Suppose that ϕ′:W→ℝ3×[0,1]\phi^{\prime}\colon W\to{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]} is another diffeomorphism restricting to ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}} and ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}} on WinW_{\mathrm{in}} and WoutW_{\mathrm{out}} respectively.

Lemma 4.7, proved below, implies that the link cobordisms ϕ⁡(Σ)\phi(\Sigma) and ϕ′​(Σ)\phi^{\prime}(\Sigma) are isotopic rel boundary in ℝ3×[0,1]{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]} and we have KhRN​(ϕ⁡(Σ))=KhRN​(ϕ′​(Σ))\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi(\Sigma))=\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi^{\prime}(\Sigma)) by Theorem 2.4.

Next we show independence of ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}}, given a fixed choice of ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}}. Let ϕin′:Win→ℝ3\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}}\colon W_{\mathrm{in}}\to{\mathbb{R}}^{3} be another diffeomorphism such that ϕin′​(Σin)\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}}(\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}) is generic and blackboard-framed, and ϕ′\phi^{\prime} another diffeomorphism W→ℝ3×[0,1]W\to{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]} restricting to ϕin′\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}} on WinW_{\mathrm{in}} but still to ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}} on WoutW_{\mathrm{out}}. Then, by Lemma 4.1 (1), we can find a family ϕin,t\phi_{\mathrm{in},t} connecting ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}} to ϕin′\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}}. By definition of parallel transport, we have:

η⁡(ϕin′)=KhRN​(ϕin,t​(Σin))​(η⁡(ϕin))\eta(\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}})=\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi_{\mathrm{in},t}(\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}))(\eta(\phi_{\mathrm{in}}))

Now we obtain a new diffeomorphism ϕ′∘ϕin,t:W→ℝ3×[0,1]\phi^{\prime}\circ\phi_{\mathrm{in},t}\colon W\to{\mathbb{R}}^{3}\times{[0,1]} and by the previous independence result and Theorem 2.4, we have:

KhRN​(ϕ′​(Σ))​(η⁡(ϕin′))=KhRN​(ϕ′​(Σ)∘ϕin,t​(Σin))​(η⁡(ϕin))=KhRN​(ϕ⁡(Σ))​(η⁡(ϕin))\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi^{\prime}(\Sigma))(\eta(\phi^{\prime}_{\mathrm{in}}))=\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi^{\prime}(\Sigma)\circ\phi_{\mathrm{in},t}(\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}))(\eta(\phi_{\mathrm{in}}))=\mathrm{KhR}_{N}(\phi(\Sigma))(\eta(\phi_{\mathrm{in}}))

Thus, the definition was independent of the choice of ϕin\phi_{\mathrm{in}}. An analogous argument also establishes independence of the choice of ϕout\phi_{\mathrm{out}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Scott Morrison, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:1907.12194v5