ScalingStacks

Proof: Since we already know that X1,X2X_{1},X_{2} and X3X_{3} are graded subcomplexes of C¯​(D1),\overline{C}(D_{1}), it suffices to check (112) on the level of underlying abelian groups. We have α=β​ψ3\alpha=\beta\psi_{3} and, therefore, for z∈C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1}z\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\}

α​z=β​ψ3​z∈X3\alpha z=\beta\psi_{3}z\in X_{3} (113)

Subcomplex X1X_{1} consists of elements z+α​zz+\alpha z and we know that α​z∈X3.\alpha z\in X_{3}. We are thus reduced to proving the following direct sum splitting of abelian groups

C¯(D1)=C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1}⊕X2⊕X3\overline{C}(D_{1})=\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\}\oplus X_{2}\oplus X_{3} (114)

Next recall that X2X_{2} consists of elements z+d​wz+dw for z,w∈C¯(D1(∗00)).z,w\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00)). The differential d​wdw reads

d​w=d00​w+[−1]​ψ1​w+[−1]​ψ2​wdw=d_{00}w+[-1]\psi_{1}w+[-1]\psi_{2}w (115)

Note that [−1]ψ2(w)∈C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1}[-1]\psi_{2}(w)\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\} and d00w∈C¯(D1(∗00)).d_{00}w\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00)). Let X2′X^{\prime}_{2} be the subgroup of C¯​(D1)\overline{C}(D_{1}) given by

X2′={z+[−1]ψ1w|z,w∈C¯(D1(∗00))}X^{\prime}_{2}=\{z+[-1]\psi_{1}w|z,w\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00))\} (116)

Then it is enough to verify that C¯​(D1)\overline{C}(D_{1}) is a direct sum of its subgroups C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1},X2′\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\},X^{\prime}_{2} and X3X_{3}:

C¯(D1)=C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1}⊕X2′⊕X3.\overline{C}(D_{1})=\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\}\oplus X^{\prime}_{2}\oplus X_{3}. (117)

Note that X3X_{3} contains C¯(D1(∗11))[−2]{−2}\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 11))[-2]\{-2\} and X2′X^{\prime}_{2} contains C¯(D1(∗00)).\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00)). Recall the direct sum decomposition

C¯​(D1)\displaystyle\overline{C}(D_{1}) =\displaystyle= C¯(D1(∗00))⊕C¯(D1(∗01))[−1]{−1}\displaystyle\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00))\oplus\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 01))[-1]\{-1\}
⊕\displaystyle\oplus C¯(D1(∗10))[−1]{−1}⊕C¯(D1(∗11))[−2]{−2}\displaystyle\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 10))[-1]\{-1\}\oplus\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 11))[-2]\{-2\}

of C¯​(D1).\overline{C}(D_{1}). Let X2′′X^{\prime\prime}_{2} and X3′X^{\prime}_{3} be the following abelian subgroups of C¯(D1(∗10))[−1]{−1}\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 10))[-1]\{-1\}:

X2′′\displaystyle X^{\prime\prime}_{2} =\displaystyle= {[−1]ψ1(w)|w∈C¯(D1(∗00))}\displaystyle\{[-1]\psi_{1}(w)|w\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 00))\}
X3′\displaystyle X^{\prime}_{3} =\displaystyle= {β(w)|w∈C¯(D1(∗11))[−2]{−2}}\displaystyle\{\beta(w)|w\in\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 11))[-2]\{-2\}\}

Now we are reduced to proving the direct sum decomposition

C¯(D1(∗10))[−1]{−1}=X2′′⊕X3′\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 10))[-1]\{-1\}=X^{\prime\prime}_{2}\oplus X^{\prime}_{3} (118)

in the category of abelian groups. As an abelian group, C¯(D1(∗10))[−1]{−1}\overline{C}(D_{1}(\ast 10))[-1]\{-1\} is a direct sum of F​(D1​(ℒ​a))F(D_{1}(\mathcal{L}a)) over all possible resolutions of the (n−2)(n-2)-double points of D1.D_{1}. Similar direct sum splittings can be formed for X2′′X^{\prime\prime}_{2} and X3′X^{\prime}_{3} and one sees then that it suffices to check (118) when D1D_{1} has only two double points. There are two such D1D_{1}’s:

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Mikhail Khovanov

Original source: arXiv:math/9908171v2