ScalingStacks

2.3 Algebra AA and (1+1)-dimensional cobordisms

Consider the surfaces S21,S12,S01,S10,S22S_{2}^{1},S_{1}^{2},S_{0}^{1},S_{1}^{0},S_{2}^{2} and S11S_{1}^{1}, depicted below

[Uncaptioned image]
[Uncaptioned image]

Each of these surfaces SabS_{a}^{b} defines a cobordism from a union of aa circles to a union of bb circles. We denote by ℳ\mathcal{M} the category whose objects are closed one-dimensional manifolds and morphisms are two-dimensional cobordisms between these manifolds generated by the above cobordisms. Specifically, objects of ℳ\mathcal{M} are enumerated by nonnegative integers Ob​(ℳ)={n¯|n∈ℤ+}.\mbox{Ob}(\mathcal{M})=\{\overline{n}|n\in\mathbb{Z}_{+}\}. A morphism between n¯\overline{n} and m¯\overline{m} is a compact oriented surface SS with boundary being the union of n+mn+m circles. The boundary circles are split into two sets ∂0S\partial_{0}S and ∂1S\partial_{1}S with ∂0S\partial_{0}S containing nn and ∂1S\partial_{1}S containing mm circles. An ordering of elements of each of these two sets is fixed. The surface SS is presented as a concatenation of disjoint unions of elementary surfaces, depicted above. Morphisms are composed in the usual way by gluing boundary circles. Two morphisms are equal if the surfaces S,TS,T representing these morphisms are diffeomorphic via a diffeomorphism that extends the identification ∂0S≅∂0T,∂1S≅∂1T\partial_{0}S\cong\partial_{0}T,\partial_{1}S\cong\partial_{1}T of their boundaries. ℳ\mathcal{M} is a monoidal category with tensor product of morphisms defined by taking the disjoint union of surfaces.

Let us construct a monoidal functor from ℳ\mathcal{M} to the category R​-mod0R{\mbox{-mod}_{0}} of graded RR-modules and graded module maps. Assign graded RR-module A⊗nA^{\otimes n} to the object n¯\overline{n} and to the elementary surfaces S21,S12,S01,S10,S22,S11S_{2}^{1},S_{1}^{2},S_{0}^{1},S_{1}^{0},S_{2}^{2},S_{1}^{1} assign morphisms m,Δ,ι,ϵ,Perm,Idm,\Delta,\iota,\epsilon,\mbox{Perm},\mbox{Id}

F⁡(S21)=m,F⁡(S12)=Δ,F⁡(S01)=ι,F⁡(S10)=ϵ,F⁡(S22)=Perm,F⁡(S11)=Id,\begin{array}[]{lll}F(S_{2}^{1})=m,&F(S_{1}^{2})=\Delta,&F(S_{0}^{1})=\iota,\\ F(S_{1}^{0})=\epsilon,&F(S_{2}^{2})=\mbox{Perm},&F(S_{1}^{1})=\mbox{Id},\\ \end{array} (20)

where Perm:A⊗A→A⊗A\mbox{Perm}:A\otimes A\to A\otimes A is the permutation map, Perm​(u⊗v)=v⊗u,\mbox{Perm}(u\otimes v)=v\otimes u, and Id is the identity map Id:A→A.\mbox{Id}:A\to A.

To check that FF is well-defined one must verify that for any two ways to glue an arbitrary surface SS in Mor⁡(ℳ){\mathrm{Mor}}(\mathcal{M}) from copies of these six elementary surfaces, the two maps of RR-modules, defined by these two decompositions of S,S, coincide. This follows from the commutative algebra and cocommutative coalgebra axioms of AA and the identity (16).

Remark: Suppose that a surface S∈ℳS\in\mathcal{M} contains a punctured genus two surface as a subsurface. Then F⁡(S)F(S) is the zero map. Indeed, we only need to check this when SS has genus two and one boundary component. Then that F⁡(S)=0F(S)=0 follows from m∘Δ∘m∘Δ=0.m\circ\Delta\circ m\circ\Delta=0.

Maps F⁡(S21),F⁡(S12),F⁡(S01),F⁡(S10),F⁡(S22)F(S_{2}^{1}),F(S_{1}^{2}),F(S_{0}^{1}),F(S_{1}^{0}),F(S_{2}^{2}) and F⁡(S11)F(S_{1}^{1}) between tensor powers of AA are graded relative to deg{\mathrm{deg}} with degrees

deg⁡(F⁡(S21))\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{2}^{1})) =\displaystyle= deg⁡(F⁡(S12))=−1,\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{1}^{2}))=-1,
deg⁡(F⁡(S01))\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{0}^{1})) =\displaystyle= deg⁡(F⁡(S10))=1,\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{1}^{0}))=1,
deg⁡(F⁡(S22))\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{2}^{2})) =\displaystyle= deg⁡(F⁡(S11)=0CLOSE\displaystyle{\mathrm{deg}}(F(S_{1}^{1})=0

From this we deduce

0PKX

Proposition 3 For a surface S∈Mor⁡(ℳ),S\in{\mathrm{Mor}}(\mathcal{M}), the degree of the map F⁡(S)F(S) of graded RR-modules is equal to the Euler characteristic of S.S.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Mikhail Khovanov

Original source: arXiv:math/9908171v2