ScalingStacks

3.4 skew-commutative cubes and complexes

Let VV be a skew ℐ\mathcal{I}-cube over an abelian category ℬ.\mathcal{B}. To VV we associate a complex C¯​(V)=(C¯i​(V),di),i∈ℤ\overline{C}(V)=(\overline{C}^{i}(V),d^{i}),i\in\mathbb{Z} of objects of ℬ\mathcal{B} by

C¯i​(V)=⊕ℒ⊂ℐ,|ℒ|=iV⁡(ℒ)\overline{C}^{i}(V)={\mathop{\oplus}\limits_{\mathcal{L}\subset\mathcal{I},|\mathcal{L}|=i}}V(\mathcal{L}) (33)

The differential di:C¯i​(V)→C¯i+1​(V)d^{i}:\overline{C}^{i}(V)\to\overline{C}^{i+1}(V) is given on an element x∈V⁡(ℒ),|ℒ|=ix\in V(\mathcal{L}),|\mathcal{L}|=i by

di​(x)=∑a∈ℐ∖ℒξaV​(ℒ)​x.d^{i}(x)=\sum_{a\in\mathcal{I}\setminus\mathcal{L}}\xi^{V}_{a}(\mathcal{L})x. (34)

Examples:

  1. 1.

    If |ℐ|=1,ℐ={a},|\mathcal{I}|=1,\mathcal{I}=\{a\},

    C¯i​(V)={V⁡(∅) if i=0 V⁡(a) if i=1 0 otherwise \overline{C}^{i}(V)=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}V(\emptyset)&\mbox{ if $i=0$ }\\ V(a)&\mbox{ if $i=1$ }\\ 0&\mbox{ otherwise }\end{array}\right.

    The differential d0=ξaV​(∅)d^{0}=\xi_{a}^{V}(\emptyset) and di=0d^{i}=0 if i≠0,i\not=0, so C¯​(V)\overline{C}(V) is the complex

    ⋯⟶0⟶V⁡(∅)⟶ξaV​(∅)V⁡(ℐ)⟶0⟶⋯\cdots\longrightarrow 0\longrightarrow V(\emptyset)\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\xi^{V}_{a}(\emptyset)}}{{\longrightarrow}}V(\mathcal{I})\longrightarrow 0\longrightarrow\cdots (35)
  2. 2.

    If ℐ\mathcal{I} contains two elements, say, ℐ={a,b},\mathcal{I}=\{a,b\}, then

    C¯i​(V)={V⁡(∅) if i=0 V⁡(a)⊕V⁡(b) if i=1 V⁡(a​b) if i=2 0 otherwise \overline{C}^{i}(V)=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}V(\emptyset)&\mbox{ if $i=0$ }\\ V(a)\oplus V(b)&\mbox{ if $i=1$ }\\ V(ab)&\mbox{ if $i=2$ }\\ 0&\mbox{ otherwise }\end{array}\right.

    and differentials

    d0:\displaystyle d^{0}: V⁡(∅)⟶V⁡(a)⊕V⁡(b)\displaystyle V(\emptyset)\longrightarrow V(a)\oplus V(b)
    d0=\displaystyle d^{0}= ξbV​(∅)+ξaV​(∅)\displaystyle\xi_{b}^{V}(\emptyset)+\xi_{a}^{V}(\emptyset)
    d1:\displaystyle d^{1}: V⁡(b)⊕V⁡(a)⟶V⁡(a​b)\displaystyle V(b)\oplus V(a)\longrightarrow V(ab)
    d1=\displaystyle d^{1}= (ξaV​(b),ξbV​(a))\displaystyle(\xi_{a}^{V}(b),\xi_{b}^{V}(a))
0PL0

Proposition 4 Let VV be a skew ℐ\mathcal{I}-cube over an abelian category ℬ\mathcal{B} and suppose that for some a∈ℐa\in\mathcal{I} and any ℒ⊂ℐ∖{a}\mathcal{L}\subset\mathcal{I}\setminus\{a\} the map ξaV:V⁡(ℒ)→V⁡(ℒ​a)\xi^{V}_{a}:V(\mathcal{L})\to V(\mathcal{L}a) is an isomorphism. Then the complex C¯​(V)\overline{C}(V) is acyclic.

Proof: The complex C¯​(V)\overline{C}(V) is isomorphic to the cone of the identity map of the complex C¯(Va(∗1))[−1]\overline{C}(V_{a}(\ast 1))[-1] and, therefore, acyclic. □\square

Every map of ℐ\mathcal{I}-cubes ϕ:V⟶W\phi:V\longrightarrow W over R​-mod0R{\mbox{-mod}_{0}} induces a map of complexes

C¯​(ϕ):C¯​(V⊗Eℐ)⟶C¯​(W⊗Eℐ).\overline{C}(\phi):\overline{C}(V\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}})\longrightarrow\overline{C}(W\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}}). (36)

If ϕ\phi is an isomorphism of commutative cubes, C¯​(ϕ)\overline{C}(\phi) is an isomorphism of complexes.

0PL1

Proposition 5 Let VV be an ℐ\mathcal{I}-cube over R​-mod0R{\mbox{-mod}_{0}} and suppose that for some a∈ℐa\in\mathcal{I} the structure map

ξaV:Va(∗0)⟶Va(∗1)\xi^{V}_{a}:V_{a}(\ast 0)\longrightarrow V_{a}(\ast 1) (37)

is an isomorphism. Then the complex C¯​(V⊗Eℐ)\overline{C}(V\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}}) is acyclic.

Proof: Immediate from Proposition 4. □\square

The following proposition and its corollary are obvious.

0PL2

Proposition 6 We have a canonical splitting of complexes

C¯​(V⊕W)=C¯​(V)⊕C¯​(W)\overline{C}(V\oplus W)=\overline{C}(V)\oplus\overline{C}(W) (38)

where VV and WW are skew-commutative ℐ\mathcal{I}-cubes over an abelian category and V⊕WV\oplus W is the direct sum of VV and WW.

0PL3

Corollary 1 We have a canonical splitting of complexes

C¯​((V⊕W)⊗Eℐ)=C¯​(V⊗Eℐ)⊕C¯​(W⊗Eℐ)\overline{C}((V\oplus W)\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}})=\overline{C}(V\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}})\oplus\overline{C}(W\otimes E_{\mathcal{I}}) (39)

where VV and WW are ℐ\mathcal{I}-cubes over R​-mod0.R{\mbox{-mod}_{0}}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Mikhail Khovanov

Original source: arXiv:math/9908171v2