3.4 skew-commutative cubes and complexes
Let be a skew -cube over an abelian category
To we associate a complex
of objects of by
|
|
|
(33) |
The differential is given on an element
by
|
|
|
(34) |
Examples:
- 1.
If
|
|
|
The differential and if
so is the complex
|
|
|
(35) |
- 2.
If contains two elements, say, then
|
|
|
and differentials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0PL0
Proposition 4 Let be a skew
-cube over an abelian category and suppose
that for some and any the map
is an isomorphism.
Then the complex is acyclic.
Proof: The complex is isomorphic to the cone of
the identity map of the complex and, therefore,
acyclic.
Every map of -cubes over induces
a map of complexes
|
|
|
(36) |
If is an isomorphism of commutative cubes,
is an isomorphism of complexes.
0PL1
Proposition 5 Let be an -cube over and
suppose that for some the structure map
|
|
|
(37) |
is an isomorphism. Then the complex is acyclic.
Proof: Immediate from Proposition 4.
The following proposition and its corollary are obvious.
0PL2
Proposition 6 We have a canonical splitting of complexes
|
|
|
(38) |
where and are skew-commutative
-cubes over an abelian category and
is the direct sum of and .
0PL3
Corollary 1 We have a canonical splitting of complexes
|
|
|
(39) |
where and are -cubes over