ScalingStacks

7.7 An application to the crossing number

0PME

Definition 3 A plane diagram DD with the set ℐ\mathcal{I} of double points is called ++adequate if for each double point aa the diagram D⁡(ℐ∖{a})D(\mathcal{I}\setminus\{a\}) has one circle less than D⁡(ℐ).D(\mathcal{I}).

0PMF

Definition 4 A plane diagram DD with the set ℐ\mathcal{I} of double points is called −-adequate if for each double point aa the diagram D⁡({a})D(\{a\}) has one circle less than D⁡(∅).D(\emptyset).

0PMG

Definition 5 A plane diagram DD is called adequate if it is both ++ and −-adequate.

These definitions are from [LT] and [T].

0PMH

Proposition 36 Let DD be a diagram with nn crossings. Then ℋ¯0​(D)≠0\overline{{\cal H}}^{0}(D)\not=0 if and only if DD is −-adequate and ℋ¯n​(D)≠0\overline{{\cal H}}^{n}(D)\not=0 if and only if DD is ++adequate.

Proof: The differential ∂0:𝒞¯′​(𝒟)→𝒞¯∞​(𝒟)\partial^{0}:\overline{\cal C}^{0}(D)\to\overline{\cal C}^{1}(D) is not injective and, hence, ℋ¯0​(D)≠0\overline{{\cal H}}^{0}(D)\not=0 if and only if DD is −-adequate. Similarly for ℋ¯n​(D)\overline{{\cal H}}^{n}(D) and ++adequate diagrams (groups ℋ¯i​(D)\overline{{\cal H}}^{i}(D) were defined at the end of Section 7.1). □\square

0PMI

Definition 6 Homological length hl⁡(L){\mathrm{hl}}(L) of an oriented link LL is the difference between the maximal ii such that ℋi​(L)≠0{\cal H}^{i}(L)\not=0 and the minimal ii such that ℋi​(L)≠0.{\cal H}^{i}(L)\not=0.

Denote by c⁡(L)c(L) the crossing number of LL. It is the minimal number of crossings in a plane diagram of L.L.

0PMJ

Proposition 37 For an oriented link LL

c⁡(L)≥hl⁡(L)c(L)\geq{\mathrm{hl}}(L) (181)

Proof: Let DD be a diagram of LL with c⁡(L)c(L) crossings. Then 𝒞¯⟩(𝒟)=′\overline{\cal C}^{i}(D)=0 for i<0i<0 and for i>hl⁡(L).i>{\mathrm{hl}}(L). Consequently, ℋ¯i​(D)=0\overline{{\cal H}}^{i}(D)=0 for i<0i<0 and i>hl⁡(L).i>{\mathrm{hl}}(L).

□\square

0PMK

Corollary 13 Let DD be an adequate diagram with nn crossings of a link L.L. Then c⁡(L)=n.c(L)=n.

Proof: By Proposition 36 ℋ¯0​(D)≠0\overline{{\cal H}}^{0}(D)\not=0 and ℋ¯n​(D)≠0.\overline{{\cal H}}^{n}(D)\not=0. Therefore, c⁡(L)≥hl⁡(L)≥n.c(L)\geq{\mathrm{hl}}(L)\geq n. But since DD is an nn-crossing diagram of L,L, the crossing number of LL is n.n. □\square

Corollary 13 was originally obtained by Thistlethwaite (Corollary 3.4 of [T]) through the analysis of the 22-variable Kauffman polynomial (not to be confused with the Kauffman bracket).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Mikhail Khovanov

Original source: arXiv:math/9908171v2