We define a functor by sending a quasi-coherent sheaf to the functor . This is
a colimit preserving functor, since is perfect. Furthermore,
using the projection
formula for the map , this functor naturally admits the
extra structure of -linearity as follows
for any . Therefore, we in fact obtain a functor
, and the rest of this proof
will be devoted to showing it is an equivalence.
Recall that the -category of quasi-coherent sheaves on is given by the limit
By working locally in the target,
this provides a description of the -category of -linear functors with values in as
the limit
Likewise,
we have a description of the -category of quasi-coherent sheaves on
the fiber product as a limit
This follows from the fact that the functor takes colimits
to limits, and the fiber product functor commutes
with all colimits (because it has a right adjoint).
Now one can analyze the functor
by considering the terms in the above two limits. That is, to prove the theorem,
it suffices to prove it locally in the target : for any , we must show that the functor
is an equivalence.
We will prove this in two steps. First, we will deal with case that the base is affine.
Afterward, we will use this case to deal with a general base .
So assume for the time being that . Then is a perfect stack
over , and by Corollary 4.8,
is a self-dual -module. Thus we have equivalences
By Proposition 4.13 we know that the
functor takes affine base change to tensor product of
-categories. Therefore we have an equivalence
Putting together the above equivalences, we conclude that we have equivalences
This proves the theorem
when is affine.
Working locally in the base , we will now use the above
discussion to prove the theorem in general. As above, since
and fiber products behave well with respect to colimits we can
calculate the -category of quasi-coherent sheaves on the fiber product
as the limit
To calculate the -category of functors, we use the following: by
Proposition 4.13, the -category is
a dualizable -module and hence the functor commutes with all limits. Therefore we have an
equivalence
and so in particular we obtain equivalences
By the adjunction between induction and restriction, and a repeated application
of Proposition 4.13, we also have equivalences
Finally, by the above discussion and the affine case of the theorem with base ,
we obtain the following chain of equivalences
Since we previously reduced the theorem to the case when ,
this completes the proof.
∎