ScalingStacks

6.2. Deligne-Kontsevich conjectures for derived centers

The notion of Drinfeld center for monoidal stable categories is a categorical analogue of Hochschild cohomology of associative (or A∞A_{\infty}) algebras (or more precisely of Hochschild cochains, or its spectral analogue, topological Hochschild cohomology). In the case of algebras, Deligne’s conjecture states that the Hochschild cochain complex has the structure of an ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-algebra (lifting the Gerstenhaber algebra, or H∗​(ℰ2)H_{*}(\mathcal{E}_{2})-algebra, structure on Hochschild cohomology). There is also a cyclic version of the conjecture which states that the Hochschild cochains for a Frobenius algebra possesses the further structure of a framed ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}, or ribbon, algebra. See [T1, K1, KS1, MS, C, KS2] for various proofs of the Deligne conjecture and [Ka, TZ] for its cyclic version. The Kontsevich conjecture (see [T2, HKV]) generalizes this picture to higher algebras, asserting that the Hochschild cochains on an ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-algebra have a natural ℰn+1\mathcal{E}_{n+1}-structure.

The work of Costello [C] and Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS2] explains how a strong form of the Deligne conjecture follows from the structure of topological field theory – specifically, by constructing a topological field theory 𝒵A\mathcal{Z}_{A} from an algebra AA such that 𝒵A​(S1)\mathcal{Z}_{A}(S^{1}) is the Hochschild cochain complex of AA. Observe that the configuration space of mm-tuples of circles in the disk (the mm-th space of the ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-operad) maps to the space of functors 𝒵​(S1)⊗m→𝒵⁡(S1)\mathcal{Z}(S^{1})^{\otimes m}\to\mathcal{Z}(S^{1}) compatibly with

compositions.

0NYW

Proposition 6.6. In any 2d TFT 𝒵\mathcal{Z}, the object 𝒵⁡(S1)∈𝒞\mathcal{Z}(S^{1})\in\mathcal{C} is an algebra over the framed ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-operad (in particular, over the ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-operad).

A natural categorified analogue of the Deligne conjecture states that the Drinfeld center of a monoidal ∞\infty-category is an ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-category. For dualizable and self-dual kk-linear ∞\infty-categories, one can ask if this structure comes from a natural framed ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}, or ribbon, structure. We observe that our identification of the Drinfeld center of QC⁡(X)\qc(X) with sheaves on the loop space, combined with the construction of the topological field theory 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X}, automatically solves this conjecture in the applicable cases:

0NYX

Corollary 6.7. For XX a perfect stack, the center 𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X))≃QC⁡(ℒ​X)\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X))\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}X) has the structure of a stable framed ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-category. For a map X→YX\to Y of perfect stacks, the same holds for the center 𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X×YX))≃QC⁡(ℒ​X)\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X\times_{Y}X))\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}X).

In fact, the same arguments prove a case of the categorified form of the Kontsevich conjecture. We consider QC⁡(XSn)\qc(X^{S^{n}}) as part of an n+1n+1-dimensional topological field theory, with operations given by cobordisms of nn-manifolds.

0NYY

Corollary 6.8. For XX a perfect stack, the ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-Hochschild cohomology of the stable ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X) has the structure of a stable (framed) ℰn+1\mathcal{E}_{n+1}-category.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5