ScalingStacks

1.5. Topological field theory

As we discuss in Section 6, our results may be viewed from the perspective of topological field theory.

The ∞\infty-category QC⁡(ℒ​X)\qc(\mathcal{L}X) (the Drinfeld center 𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X))) carries a rich collection of operations generalizing the braided tensor structure on modules for the classical Drinfeld double. Namely, for any cobordism Σ\Sigma between disjoint unions of circles (S1)∐m(S^{1})^{\coprod m} and (S1)∐n(S^{1})^{\coprod n}, we obtain restriction maps between the corresponding mapping stacks

(ℒ​X)×m←XΣ→(ℒ​X)×n.(\mathcal{L}X)^{\times m}\leftarrow X^{\Sigma}\rightarrow(\mathcal{L}X)^{\times n}.

Pullback and pushforward along this correspondence defines a functor

QC⁡(ℒ​X)⊗m→QC⁡(ℒ​X)⊗n\qc(\mathcal{L}X)^{\otimes m}\to\qc(\mathcal{L}X)^{\otimes n}

which is compatible with composition of cobordisms. In particular, we obtain a map from the configuration space of mm small disks in the standard disk to functors

QC⁡(ℒ​X)⊗m→QC⁡(ℒ​X).\qc(\mathcal{L}X)^{\otimes m}\to\qc(\mathcal{L}X).

This equips QC⁡(ℒ​X)\qc(\mathcal{L}X), and hence the Drinfeld center 𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X)), with the structure of a (framed) ℰ2\mathcal{E}_{2}-category. This establishes the categorified (cyclic) Deligne conjecture in the current geometric setting.

In particular for X=B​GX=BG, XΣX^{\Sigma} is the derived moduli stack of GG-local systems on Σ\Sigma and we obtain a topological gauge theory.

More generally, we have the following corollary of our main results:

0NW9

Corollary 1.13. Let XX be a perfect stack, and let Σ\Sigma be a finite simplicial set. Then there is a canonical equivalence QC⁡(XΣ)≃QC⁡(X)⊗Σ\qc(X^{\Sigma})\simeq\qc(X)\otimes\Sigma, where XΣ=Map⁡(Σ,X)X^{\Sigma}=\Map(\Sigma,X) denotes the derived mapping stack, and −⊗Σ-\otimes\Sigma the tensor of stable ∞\infty-categories over simplicial sets.

One can view this corollary as providing for a TFT over finite simplicial sets. We assign to such a simplicial set UU the ∞\infty-category QC⁡(XU)\qc(X^{U}), and for any diagram of finite simplicial sets

U→Σ←V,U\rightarrow\Sigma\leftarrow V,

(for example a cobordism of manifolds) we obtain a correspondence of mapping stacks

XU←XΣ→XV,X^{U}\leftarrow X^{\Sigma}\rightarrow X^{V},

and hence by pullback and pushforward a functor

QC⁡(XU)→QC⁡(XV),\qc(X^{U})\to\qc(X^{V}),

satisfying composition laws with respect to gluings.

In particular, since QC⁡(XSn)\qc(X^{S^{n}}) is equivalent to the ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-center 𝒵ℰn​(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{E}_{n}}(\qc(X)), we obtain an action of the (framed) ℰn+1\mathcal{E}_{n+1}-operad on 𝒵ℰn​(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{E}_{n}}(\qc(X)). This establishes the categorified (cyclic) Kontsevich conjecture in the current geometric setting.

1.5.1. Extended TFT

An exciting recent development (postdating the submission of this paper) is Jacob Lurie’s announced proof of the Cobordism Hypothesis [L6] which characterizes extended TFTs in arbitrary dimensions. The results of this paper may be used to prove that the monoidal ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X), for a perfect stack XX, defines an extended two-dimensional TFT. We briefly summarize this here (see [BN2] for more details regarding an analogous extended two-dimensional TFT).

The extended two-dimensional TFT 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} associated to a perfect stack XX is a symmetric monoidal functor

𝒵X:2​B​o​r​d→2​A​l​g\mathcal{Z}_{X}:2Bord\to 2Alg

from the (∞,2)(\infty,2)-category of unoriented bordisms:

  1. ∙\bullet

    objects: 00-manifolds,

  2. ∙\bullet

    1-morphisms: 11-dimensional bordisms between 00-manifolds,

  3. ∙\bullet

    2-morphisms: classiying spaces of 22-dimensional bordisms between 11-bordisms,

to the Morita (∞,2)(\infty,2)-category of algebras 2​A​l​g2Alg:

  1. ∙\bullet

    objects: algebra objects in stable presentable ∞\infty-categories,

  2. ∙\bullet

    1-morphisms: bimodule objects in stable presentable ∞\infty-categories,

  3. ∙\bullet

    2-morphisms: classifying spaces of morphisms of bimodules.

Note that given A∈2​A​l​gA\in 2Alg, we can pass to the (∞,2)(\infty,2)-category of modules ModA\Mod_{A}, and bimodules correspond to functors between (∞,2)(\infty,2)-categories of modules. Thus if a field theory assigns AA to a point, we can also think of it as assigning ModA\Mod_{A} to a point.

The field theory 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} assigns the following to closed 00, 11 and 22-manifolds:

  1. ∙\bullet

    To a point, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} assigns the monoidal ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X), or equivalently, the (∞,2)(\infty,2)-category of QC⁡(X)\qc(X)-linear ∞\infty-categories.

  2. ∙\bullet

    To a circle, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} assigns the Hochschild homology category of QC⁡(X)\qc(X), which by our results can be identified with QC⁡(ℒ​X)\qc(\mathcal{L}X).

  3. ∙\bullet

    To a closed surface Σ\Sigma, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} assigns the kk-module of derived global sections Γ⁡(XΣ,𝒪XΣ)\Gamma(X^{\Sigma},\mathcal{O}_{X^{\Sigma}}) of the structure sheaf of the mapping space XΣX^{\Sigma}.

The proof that QC⁡(X)\qc(X) satisfies the dualizability conditions of [L6] to define an extended TFT follows closely from the identification of the Hochschild homology and cohomology categories of QC⁡(X)\qc(X) (which is a necessary consequence of the TFT structure). One could consult [BN2] for more details in an analogous setting.

1.5.2. Rozansky-Witten theory

The topological field theory 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} introduced above is closely related to well-known three-dimensional topological field theories. When the target XX is the classifying stack B​GBG of a finite group, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} is the untwisted version of Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. More generally, if XX is a 2-gerbe (B​B​𝔾mBB{\mathbb{G}}_{m}-torsor) over B​GBG (classified by a class in H3​(G,𝔾m)H^{3}(G,{\mathbb{G}}_{m})), we obtain the twisted version (as studied in [Fr]).

When XX is a smooth complex projective variety, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} is closely related to the ℤ/2\mathbb{Z}/2-graded three-dimensional topological field theory associated to the holomorphic symplectic manifold T∗​XT^{*}X by Rozansky-Witten [RW], Kontsevich [K2] and Kapranov [Ka]. In particular see [RobW] and [KRS] for work on Rozansky-Witten theory as an extended topological field theory.

We confine ourselves here to a brief comparison of the two theories on the circle. On the one hand, 𝒵X\mathcal{Z}_{X} assigns to S1S^{1} the stable ∞\infty-category QC⁡(ℒ​X)\qc(\mathcal{L}X). Since XX is a smooth scheme, ℒ​X\mathcal{L}X is the total space TX​[−1]=Spec⁡Sym∙​ΩX​[1]T_{X}[-1]=\Spec\operatorname{Sym}^{\bullet}\Omega_{X}[1] of the shifted tangent bundle of XX. Thus we can identify QC⁡(ℒ​X)\qc(\mathcal{L}X) with module objects in the ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X) for the commutative algebra object Sym∙⁡ΩX​[1]\operatorname{Sym}^{\bullet}\Omega_{X}[1]. Via Koszul duality, this category is closely related to modules for Sym∙⁡TX​[−2]\operatorname{Sym}^{\bullet}T_{X}[-2], or in other words, sheaves on T∗​XT^{*}X with an unusual grading. On the other hand, Rozansky-Witten theory assigns to S1S^{1} the ∞\infty-category Perf⁡(T∗​X)\operatorname{Perf}(T^{*}X) of perfect complexes. It would be very interesting to develop Rozansky-Witten theory as a fully extended TFT using the results of [L6], and explore its relation with the derived algebraic geometry of QC⁡(X)\qc(X).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5