ScalingStacks

5.1.1. Cyclic bar construction

It is very useful to have versions of the Hochschild chain and cochain complexes which calculate the trace and center. In the setting of an associative algebra object AA in a monoidal โˆž\infty-category ๐’ฎ\mathcal{S}, they will take the form of a simplicial object ๐โˆ—cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) and cosimplicial object ๐cโ€‹yโ€‹cโˆ—โ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) such that the geometric realization colimโก๐โˆ—cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)\colim\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) is the trace ๐’ฏโ€‹rโ€‹(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) and the totalization lim๐cโ€‹yโ€‹cโˆ—โ€‹(A)\lim\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) is the center ๐’ตโก(A)\mathcal{Z}(A). (Note that simplicial and cosimplicial objects here are taken in the โˆž\infty-categorical sense, and so the diagram identities hold up to coherent homotopies as in, e.g., [A], where the cyclic bar construction for AโˆžA_{\infty} H-spaces is developed.)

We construct the simplicial object ๐โˆ—cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) and cosimplicial object ๐cโ€‹yโ€‹cโˆ—โ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) as follows. Consider the adjunction

๐’ฎ\textstyle{\mathcal{S}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F\scriptstyle{F}ModAโ€‹(๐’ฎ)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G\scriptstyle{G}

where F(โˆ’)=AโŠ—โˆ’F(-)=A\otimes- is the induction, and GG is the forgetful functor. It determines a comonad Sโ‰ƒFโ€‹GS\simeq FG acting on ModAโ€‹(๐’ฎ)\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{S}).

As in classical algebra, for any AA-module MM, the comonad SS provides a canonical augmented simplicial object Cโˆ—โ€‹(M)C_{*}(M) with terms

Cnโˆ’1โ€‹(M)โ‰ƒ(Fโ€‹G)nโ€‹(M)โ‰ƒAโŠ—nโŠ—MC_{n-1}(M)\simeq(FG)^{n}(M)\simeq A^{\otimes n}\otimes M

such that the geometric realization of Cโˆ—โ€‹(M)C_{*}(M) is naturally equivalent to MM. We will say that Cโˆ—โ€‹(M)C_{*}(M) is a simplicial resolution of MM.

We can apply this technique to produce the familiar cyclic bar construction. Consider the special case of the above adjunction

ModAopโ€‹(๐’ฎ)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F\scriptstyle{F}ModAโŠ—Aopโ€‹(๐’ฎ)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G\scriptstyle{G}

where F(โˆ’)=AโŠ—โˆ’F(-)=A\otimes- again is the induction, and GG is the forgetful functor from AA-bimodules to right AA-modules. Using the comonad Sโ‰ƒFโ€‹GS\simeq FG, we obtain a simplicial resolution Cโˆ—โ€‹(A)C_{*}(A) of the AA-bimodule AA whose terms Cnโˆ’1โ€‹(A)โ‰ƒAโŠ—n+1C_{n-1}(A)\simeq A^{\otimes n+1} are AA-bimodules which are free as left AA-modules.

Now recall that the trace ๐’ฏโ€‹rโ€‹(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) is defined by the self-pairing AโŠ—AโŠ—AopAA\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A. Since the tensor product commutes with colimits, in particular geometric realizations, we calculate

๐’ฏโ€‹rโ€‹(A)=AโŠ—AโŠ—AopAโ‰ƒAโŠ—AโŠ—Aop|Cโˆ—โ€‹(A)|โ‰ƒ|AโŠ—AโŠ—AopCโˆ—โ€‹(A)|.\mathcal{T}r(A)=A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A\simeq A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}|C_{*}(A)|\simeq|A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A)|.

Thus the geometric realization of AโŠ—AโŠ—AopCโˆ—โ€‹(A)A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A) calculates the trace ๐’ฏโ€‹rโ€‹(A)\mathcal{T}r(A).

We write ๐โˆ—cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) for the simplicial object AโŠ—AโŠ—AopCโˆ—โ€‹(A)A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A) and refer to it as the Hochschild chain complex. Since AA is free as a right AA-module, the terms of the simplicial object Cโˆ—โ€‹(A)C_{*}(A) are free as AA-bimodules. Thus we can evaluate the terms of the Hochschild chain complex

๐ncโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)=AโŠ—AโŠ—AopCnโ€‹(A)โ‰ƒAโŠ—AโŠ—AopAโŠ—n+2โ‰ƒAโŠ—n+1\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{n}(A)=A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{n}(A)\simeq A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A^{\otimes n+2}\simeq A^{\otimes n+1}

In particular, there are equivalences ๐0cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)โ‰ƒA\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{0}(A)\simeq A and ๐1cโ€‹yโ€‹cโ€‹(A)โ‰ƒAโŠ—A\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{1}(A)\simeq A\otimes A, and the two simplicial maps AโŠ—Aโ†’AA\otimes A\rightarrow A are the multiplication and the opposite multiplication of AA.

Similarly, recall that the center ๐’ตโก(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) is defined by the endomorphisms โ„ฐโ€‹nโ€‹dAโŠ—Aopโ€‹(A){\mathcal{E}nd}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(A). Since morphisms take colimits in the domain to limits, in particular geometric realizations to totalizations, we calculate

๐’ตโก(A)=โ„ฐโ€‹nโ€‹dAโŠ—Aopโ€‹(A)โ‰ƒโ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(|Cโˆ—โ€‹(A)|,A)โ‰ƒ|โ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(Cโˆ—โ€‹(A),A)|\mathcal{Z}(A)={\mathcal{E}nd}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(|C_{*}(A)|,A)\simeq|{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A)|

Thus the totalization of โ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(Cโˆ—โ€‹(A),A){\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A) calculates the center ๐’ตโก(A)\mathcal{Z}(A).

We write ๐cโ€‹yโ€‹cโˆ—โ€‹(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) for the cosimplicial object โ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(Cโˆ—โ€‹(A),A){\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A) and refer to it as the Hochschild cochain complex. As before, we can evaluate the terms of the Hochschild cochain complex

๐cโ€‹yโ€‹cnโ€‹(A)=โ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(Cnโ€‹(A),A)โ‰ƒโ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mAโŠ—Aoโ€‹pโ€‹(AโŠ—n+2,A)โ‰ƒโ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mโ€‹(AโŠ—n,A).\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{n}(A)={\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{n}(A),A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(A^{\otimes n+2},A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}(A^{\otimes n},A).

In particular, there are equivalences ๐cโ€‹yโ€‹c0โ€‹(A)โ‰ƒA\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{0}(A)\simeq A and ๐cโ€‹yโ€‹c1โ€‹(A)โ‰ƒโ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mโ€‹(A,A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{1}(A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}(A,A), and the two cosimplicial maps Aโ†’โ„‹โ€‹oโ€‹mโ€‹(A,A)A\to{\mathcal{H}om}(A,A) are induced by the left and right multiplication of AA.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5