ScalingStacks

1.4. Hecke categories

Let X→YX\to Y be a map of perfect stacks. Our main technical result gives an identification of (not necessarily symmetric) monoidal ∞\infty-categories

QC⁡(X×YX)≃FunQC⁡(Y)⁡(QC⁡(X),QC⁡(X))\qc(X\times_{Y}X)\simeq\Fun_{\qc(Y)}(\qc(X),\qc(X))

where the left hand side is equipped with convolution and the right hand side with the composition of functors. In other words, we have an identification of associative algebra objects in the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL{\mathcal{P}r}^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories with morphisms left adjoints.

In Section 5.2, we calculate the center of QC⁡(X×YX)\qc(X\times_{Y}X) in the following form. Recall that ℒ​Y\mathcal{L}Y denotes the derived loop space of YY.

0NW5

Theorem 1.9. Suppose p:X→Yp:X\to Y is a map of perfect stacks that satisfies descent. Then there is a canonical equivalence

𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X×YX))≃QC⁡(ℒ​Y)\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X\times_{Y}X))\simeq\qc({\mathcal{L}Y})

in which the central functor

QC⁡(ℒ​Y)≃𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X×YX))→QC⁡(X×YX)\qc({\mathcal{L}Y})\simeq\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X\times_{Y}X))\to\qc(X\times_{Y}X)

is given by pullback and pushforward along the correspondence

ℒ​Y⟵ℒ​Y×YX⟶X×YX.\mathcal{L}Y\longleftarrow\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X\longrightarrow X\times_{Y}X.

When p:X→Yp:X\to Y is also proper with invertible dualizing complex, we deduce an analogous statement identifying the trace of QC⁡(X×YX)\qc(X\times_{Y}X) with QC⁡(ℒ​Y)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y), conditional on the validity of Grothendieck duality in the derived setting.

0NW6

Remark 1.10. One can find a precursor to the above in the work of Müger [M] and Ostrik [Os].

Given a semisimple abelian monoidal category 𝒞\mathcal{C} and a module category MM, consider the monoidal category 𝒞M∗\mathcal{C}_{M}^{*} consisting of 𝒞\mathcal{C}-linear endofunctors of MM. Then independently of MM, there is a canonical identification of the Drinfeld centers of 𝒞M∗\mathcal{C}_{M}^{*} and 𝒞.\mathcal{C}.

A motivating example is when H⊂GH\subset G are finite groups, and one takes 𝒞=Rep⁡(G)\mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) and M=Rep⁡(H)M=\operatorname{Rep}(H), so that 𝒞M∗≃Vect⁡(H\G/H)\mathcal{C}^{*}_{M}\simeq\operatorname{Vect}(H\backslash G/H). Then independently of HH, the center of Vect⁡(H\G/H)\operatorname{Vect}(H\backslash G/H) is the category of adjoint equivariant vector bundles on GG.

The above theorem extends this picture from finite groups to algebraic groups.

1.4.1. Example: affine Hecke categories

As an illustration, we briefly mention a concrete application of the above theorem to a fundamental object in geometric representation theory.

Fix a reductive group GG, and consider the Grothendieck-Springer resolution G~→G\tilde{G}\to G of pairs of a group element and a Borel subgroup containing it. Let ℋG𝑎𝑓𝑓\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}} be the quasi-coherent affine Hecke ∞\infty-category of GG-equivarant quasi-coherent sheaves on the Steinberg variety

𝒮​tG=G~×GG~.{\mathcal{S}t}_{G}=\tilde{G}\times_{G}\tilde{G}.

Work of Bezrukavnikov [Be] and others places ℋG𝑎𝑓𝑓\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}} at the heart of many recent developments in geometric representation theory.

Let us apply the above theorem with X=G~/GX=\tilde{G}/G and Y=G/G=ℒ​B​GY=G/G=\mathcal{L}BG, where GG acts via conjugation. Observe that the iterated loop space ℒ​Y=ℒ⁡(G/G)=ℒ⁡(ℒ​B​G)\mathcal{L}Y=\mathcal{L}(G/G)=\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}BG) is nothing more than the derived moduli stack

ℒ​o​cG​(T2)=Map⁡(T2,B​G){\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2})=\Map(T^{2},BG)

of GG-local systems on the torus. Concretely, ℒ​o​cG​(T2){\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2}) is the “commuting variety” (or rather, commuting derived stack) parameterizing pairs of commuting elements in GG up to simultaneous conjugation.

0NW7

Corollary 1.11. There is a canonical equivalence

𝒵⁡(ℋG𝑎𝑓𝑓)≃QC⁡(ℒ⁡(ℒ​B​G))≃QC⁡((B​GS1)S1)≃QC⁡(ℒ​o​cG​(T2))\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}})\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}BG))\simeq\qc((BG^{S^{1}})^{S^{1}})\simeq\qc({\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2}))

between the center of the quasi-coherent affine Hecke ∞\infty-category and the ∞\infty-category of sheaves on the derived moduli stack of GG-local systems on the torus.

A similar statement holds replacing the Grothendieck-Springer resolution G~→G\tilde{G}\to G by the Springer resolution T∗​G/B→𝒩T^{*}G/B\to{\mathcal{N}} of the nilpotent cone. In this case, the center is equivalent to the ∞\infty-category of sheaves on the derived stack of pairs of a nilpotent and a commuting group element up to simultaneous conjugation. In this linear version, one can also work 𝔾m\mathbb{G}_{m}-equivariantly via the natural dilation action.

0NW8

Remark 1.12. We will not return to specific applications to representation theory in this paper, but the interested reader will find further results along these lines in the paper [BN2] which studies integral transforms in the context of 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}-modules. It includes applications to the more familiar Hecke categories 𝒟⁡(B\G/B){\mathcal{D}}(B\backslash G/B) of 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}-modules on flag varieties. In particular, their Drinfeld centers are identified with character sheaves on GG, resulting in a Langlands duality for character sheaves.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5