ScalingStacks

0NY7

Proposition 4.13. Let YY be a derived stack with affine diagonal, and let f:Spec⁡A→Yf:\Spec A\rightarrow Y be an affine over YY. Then ModA\Mod_{A} is a self-dual QC⁡(Y)\qc(Y)-module. In particular, for any X→YX\to Y there is a canonical equivalence

QC⁡(X×YSpec⁡A)≃QC⁡(X)⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA.\qc(X\times_{Y}\Spec A)\simeq\qc(X)\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A}.
0NY8

Proof. Since YY has affine diagonal, the map f:Spec⁡A→Yf:\Spec A\rightarrow Y is a relative affine, which implies that f∗f_{*} is colimit preserving and conservative. Hence f∗f_{*} satisfies the monadic Barr-Beck criteria [L4, Theorem 3.4.5], implying that the natural map ModA→Modf∗​f∗⁡(QC⁡(Y))\Mod_{A}\rightarrow\Mod_{f_{*}f^{*}}(\qc(Y)) is an equivalence. By the projection formula, the monad f∗​f∗​(−)f_{*}f^{*}(-) is equivalent to the functor f∗​A⊗(−)f_{*}A\otimes(-), with monad structure given by the algebra structure on AA. As a consequence, we see that ModA\Mod_{A} is equivalent to Modf∗​A⁡(QC⁡(Y))\Mod_{f_{*}A}(\qc(Y)). Now Proposition 4.1 gives that Modf∗​A⁡(QC⁡(Y))\Mod_{f_{*}A}(\qc(Y)) is self-dual as a QC⁡(Y)\qc(Y)-module.

Since the ∞\infty-category ModA\Mod_{A} is a dualizable QC⁡(Y)\qc(Y)-module it follows that the functor

(−)⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA{(-)\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A}}

commutes with limits of QC⁡(Y)\qc(Y)-module categories. Thus we have equivalences

QC⁡(X)⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA≃(limA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/XModA′)⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA≃limA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X(ModA′⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA).\qc(X)\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A}\simeq(\lim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}\Mod_{A^{\prime}})\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A}\simeq\lim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}(\Mod_{A^{\prime}}\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A}).

Another application of Proposition 4.1 implies the following equivalence

limA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X(ModA′⊗QC⁡(Y)ModA)≃limA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X(Modf∗′​A′⊗f∗​A⁡(QC⁡(Y))).\lim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}(\Mod_{A^{\prime}}\otimes_{\qc(Y)}\Mod_{A})\simeq\lim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}(\Mod_{f^{\prime}_{*}A^{\prime}\otimes f_{*}A}(\qc(Y))).

Using that the map f′×f:Spec⁡A′×YSpec⁡A→Yf^{\prime}\times f:\Spec A^{\prime}\times_{Y}\Spec A\rightarrow Y is affine and that (f′×f)∗​(A′⊠A)≃f∗′​A′⊗f∗​A(f^{\prime}\times f)_{*}(A^{\prime}\boxtimes A)\simeq f^{\prime}_{*}A^{\prime}\otimes f_{*}A, we obtain that the above is further equivalent to

limA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X(QC⁡(Spec⁡A′×YSpec⁡A))≃QC⁡(colimA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X⁡(Spec⁡A′×YSpec⁡A))\lim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}(\qc(\Spec A^{\prime}\times_{Y}\Spec A))\simeq\qc(\colim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}(\Spec A^{\prime}\times_{Y}\Spec A))
≃QC⁡((colimA′∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/X⁡Spec⁡A′)×YSpec⁡A)≃QC⁡(X×YSpec⁡A)\simeq\qc((\colim_{A^{\prime}\in\it{Aff}/X}\Spec A^{\prime})\times_{Y}\Spec A)\simeq\qc(X\times_{Y}\Spec A)

Here we have used that QC⁡(−)\qc(-) sends all colimits to limits, and that (−)×YSpec⁡A(-)\times_{Y}\Spec A commutes with colimits (since it is the left adjoint to the mapping stack over YY). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5