ScalingStacks

4.1.2. Small stable categories

We have been working with the symmetric monoidal structure on the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories as developed inΒ [L4], [L5]. We will also need the tensor product of small stable idempotent complete ∞\infty-categories, in particular, the ∞\infty-categories of compact objects in presentable stable ∞\infty-categories.

Let s​t{st} be the full ∞\infty-subcategory of the ∞\infty-category of stable categories (with morphisms exact functors) consisting of those ∞\infty-categories that are idempotent complete. Recall that an ∞\infty-category π’ž\mathcal{C} is idempotent complete if the essential image of the Yoneda embedding π’žβ†’π’«β‘(π’ž)\mathcal{C}\rightarrow\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{C}) is closed under retracts.

0NXS

Proposition 4.4. The ∞\infty-category s​t{st} carries a symmetric monoidal structure characterized by the property that for π’ž1,π’ž2,π’Ÿβˆˆs​t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}\in{st}, the ∞\infty-category of exact functors Funs​t⁑(π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)\Fun_{{st}}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) is equivalent to the full ∞\infty-subcategory of all functors π’ž1Γ—π’ž2β†’π’Ÿ\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2}\to\mathcal{D} that preserve finite colimits in π’ž1\mathcal{C}_{1} and π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{2} separately. Furthermore, passing to the corresponding stable presentable ∞\infty-categories of Ind\operatorname{Ind}-objects is naturally a symmetric monoidal functor.

0NXT

Proof. For π’ž1,π’ž2∈s​t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2}\in{st}, we define their tensor product by

π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2=(Ind⁑(π’ž1)βŠ—Ind⁑(π’ž2))c\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2}=(\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}_{1})\otimes\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}_{2}))^{c}

where the tensor product of the right hand side is calculated in the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories (with morphisms left adjoints), and the superscript c denotes the full ∞\infty-subcategory of compact objects of a presentable ∞\infty-category. Since Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2} is idempotent complete and retracts of compact objects are compact, (Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2)c(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2})^{c} is idempotent complete as well. Thus the tensor product π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} is indeed an object of s​t{st}.

For π’ž1,π’ž2,π’Ÿβˆˆs​t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}\in{st}, let Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) be the full ∞\infty-subcategory of functors π’ž1Γ—π’ž2β†’π’Ÿ\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2}\to\mathcal{D} that preserve finite colimits in π’ž1\mathcal{C}_{1} and π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{2} separately. We claim that For π’ž1,π’ž2∈s​t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2}\in{st}, the tensor product π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} corepresents the functor Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,βˆ’)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},-) in the sense that for any π’Ÿβˆˆs​t\mathcal{D}\in{st}, there is a canonical equivalence

Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)≃Funs​t⁑(π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ).\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun_{{st}}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}).

As a consequence, the associativity and symmetry of the tensor product π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} will immediately follow from the analogous properties of Funβ€²\Fun^{\prime}.

For π’ž1,π’ž2,π’Ÿβˆˆπ’«β€‹rL\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}, let FunLΓ—L⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)\Fun^{L\times L}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) be the full ∞\infty-subcategory of functors π’ž1Γ—π’ž2β†’π’Ÿ\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2}\to\mathcal{D} that preserve colimits in π’ž1\mathcal{C}_{1} and π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{2} separately. To prove the claim, observe that the inclusion π’Ÿβ†’Indβ‘π’Ÿ\mathcal{D}\rightarrow\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D} induces a fully faithful functor

Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)β†’Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,Indβ‘π’Ÿ)≃FunLΓ—L⁑(Indβ‘π’ž1Γ—Indβ‘π’ž2,Indβ‘π’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\rightarrow\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun^{L\times L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})

Its essential image consists of functors that preserve compact objects. By definition of the monoidal structure on the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories, we have a further equivalence

FunLΓ—L⁑(Indβ‘π’ž1Γ—Indβ‘π’ž2,Indβ‘π’Ÿ)≃FunL⁑(Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2,Indβ‘π’Ÿ).\Fun^{L\times L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun^{\rm L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D}).

Since the compact objects of Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2} are generated by finite colimits of external products of compacts objects, we obtain an equivalence between Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) and the full ∞\infty-subcategory of FunL⁑(Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2,Indβ‘π’Ÿ)\Fun^{\rm L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D}) consisting of functors that preserve compact objects. In other words, we have the asserted equivalence that characterizes the tensor product

Fun′⁑(π’ž1Γ—π’ž2,π’Ÿ)≃Funs​t⁑((Indβ‘π’ž1βŠ—Indβ‘π’ž2)c,π’Ÿ).\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun_{{st}}((\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2})^{c},\mathcal{D}).

Finally, the assertion that the functor Ind:s​t→𝒫​rL\operatorname{Ind}:{st}\to\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} is symmetric monoidal is immediate from the constructions and the natural equivalence Ind⁑(π’žc)β‰ƒπ’ž\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}^{c})\simeq\mathcal{C}, for π’žβˆˆπ’«β€‹rL\mathcal{C}\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}. ∎

0NXU

Remark 4.5. Given small stable idempotent complete ∞\infty-categories π’ž1,π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2}, by construction their tensor product π’ž1βŠ—π’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} is again a small stable idempotent complete ∞\infty-category. Though it is possible to consider other versions of a tensor product on small stable ∞\infty-categories that need not preserve idempotent complete ∞\infty-categories, our approach builds it in from the beginning.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5