ScalingStacks

1.4.1. Example: affine Hecke categories

As an illustration, we briefly mention a concrete application of the above theorem to a fundamental object in geometric representation theory.

Fix a reductive group GG, and consider the Grothendieck-Springer resolution G~โ†’G\tilde{G}\to G of pairs of a group element and a Borel subgroup containing it. Let โ„‹G๐‘Ž๐‘“๐‘“\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}} be the quasi-coherent affine Hecke โˆž\infty-category of GG-equivarant quasi-coherent sheaves on the Steinberg variety

๐’ฎโ€‹tG=G~ร—GG~.{\mathcal{S}t}_{G}=\tilde{G}\times_{G}\tilde{G}.

Work of Bezrukavnikov [Be] and others places โ„‹G๐‘Ž๐‘“๐‘“\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}} at the heart of many recent developments in geometric representation theory.

Let us apply the above theorem with X=G~/GX=\tilde{G}/G and Y=G/G=โ„’โ€‹Bโ€‹GY=G/G=\mathcal{L}BG, where GG acts via conjugation. Observe that the iterated loop space โ„’โ€‹Y=โ„’โก(G/G)=โ„’โก(โ„’โ€‹Bโ€‹G)\mathcal{L}Y=\mathcal{L}(G/G)=\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}BG) is nothing more than the derived moduli stack

โ„’โ€‹oโ€‹cGโ€‹(T2)=Mapโก(T2,Bโ€‹G){\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2})=\Map(T^{2},BG)

of GG-local systems on the torus. Concretely, โ„’โ€‹oโ€‹cGโ€‹(T2){\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2}) is the โ€œcommuting varietyโ€ (or rather, commuting derived stack) parameterizing pairs of commuting elements in GG up to simultaneous conjugation.

0NW7

Corollary 1.11. There is a canonical equivalence

๐’ตโก(โ„‹G๐‘Ž๐‘“๐‘“)โ‰ƒQCโก(โ„’โก(โ„’โ€‹Bโ€‹G))โ‰ƒQCโก((Bโ€‹GS1)S1)โ‰ƒQCโก(โ„’โ€‹oโ€‹cGโ€‹(T2))\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{H}_{G}^{\it{aff}})\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}BG))\simeq\qc((BG^{S^{1}})^{S^{1}})\simeq\qc({\mathcal{L}oc}_{G}(T^{2}))

between the center of the quasi-coherent affine Hecke โˆž\infty-category and the โˆž\infty-category of sheaves on the derived moduli stack of GG-local systems on the torus.

A similar statement holds replacing the Grothendieck-Springer resolution G~โ†’G\tilde{G}\to G by the Springer resolution Tโˆ—โ€‹G/Bโ†’๐’ฉT^{*}G/B\to{\mathcal{N}} of the nilpotent cone. In this case, the center is equivalent to the โˆž\infty-category of sheaves on the derived stack of pairs of a nilpotent and a commuting group element up to simultaneous conjugation. In this linear version, one can also work ๐”พm\mathbb{G}_{m}-equivariantly via the natural dilation action.

0NW8

Remark 1.12. We will not return to specific applications to representation theory in this paper, but the interested reader will find further results along these lines in the paper [BN2] which studies integral transforms in the context of ๐’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}}-modules. It includes applications to the more familiar Hecke categories ๐’Ÿโก(B\G/B){\mathcal{D}}(B\backslash G/B) of ๐’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}}-modules on flag varieties. In particular, their Drinfeld centers are identified with character sheaves on GG, resulting in a Langlands duality for character sheaves.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5