ScalingStacks

5.2.3. Traces and Grothendieck duality

Finally, we explain here an analogous description of traces, conditional on a still to be developed version of Grothendieck duality in the derived setting. Namely, assuming further that p:X→Yp:X\to Y is proper with invertible dualizing sheaf and Grothendieck duality holds, we explain how to deduce an expected canonical equivalence

𝒯​r​(QC⁑(XΓ—YX))≃QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X\times_{Y}X))\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}Y)

such that the trace 𝔱​𝔯:QC⁑(XΓ—YX)→𝒯​r​(QC⁑(XΓ—YX))\mathfrak{tr}:\qc(X\times_{Y}X)\to\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X\times_{Y}X)) is given by the correspondence Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ΄βˆ—:QC⁑(XΓ—YX)β†’QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\pi_{*}\delta^{*}:\qc(X\times_{Y}X)\to\qc(\mathcal{L}Y).

We continue with the notation from the proof of TheoremΒ 5.3 and the preceding sections. We will show that the geometric realization colimβ‘πβˆ—B​(A)\colim\mathbf{N}^{B}_{*}(A) of the relative Hochschild chain complex also calculates the ∞\infty-category QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y). As before, applying the results of SectionΒ 4, we can rewrite the terms of πβˆ—B​(A)\mathbf{N}^{B}_{*}(A) in the form

𝐍nB(A)≃QC(β„’YΓ—YXΓ—Yβ‹―Γ—YX)Β withΒ n+1Β copies ofΒ X.\mathbf{N}^{B}_{n}(A)\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X\times_{Y}\cdots\times_{Y}X)\quad\mbox{ with $n+1$ copies of $X$.}

Furthermore, it is straightforward to check that under this identification the boundary maps of πβˆ—B​(A)\mathbf{N}^{B}_{*}(A) are given by the pushforwards 𝔭nβˆ—\mathfrak{p}_{n*} which are right adjoints to the usual CΜ†ech pullbacks 𝔭nβˆ—\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{*}.

To reduce notation, set Xn=XΓ—Yβ‹―Γ—YXX_{n}=X\times_{Y}\cdots\times_{Y}X with n+1n+1 copies of XX.

Now suppose that p:Xβ†’Yp:X\to Y is proper and has an invertible dualizing complex (Gorenstein). Then we expect Grothendieck duality to hold in the following form: the pushforwards 𝔭nβˆ—\mathfrak{p}_{n*} are also left adjoints to the pullbacks

𝔭n!(βˆ’)≃𝔭nβˆ—(βˆ’βŠ—Ο‰β„’β€‹YΓ—YXnβˆ’1/Yβˆ’1)βŠ—Ο‰β„’β€‹YΓ—YXn/Y,\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{!}(-)\simeq\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{*}(-\otimes\omega^{-1}_{\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n-1}/Y})\otimes\omega_{\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}/Y},

where ωℒ​YΓ—YXn/Y\omega_{\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}/Y} denotes the relative dualizing sheaf of ℒ​YΓ—YXnβ†’Y\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}\to Y. Under this assumption, we find that the limit QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y) of the cosimplicial ∞\infty-category (QC⁑(ℒ​YΓ—YXn),𝔭nβˆ—)(\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}),\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{*}) admits the following alternative description.

First, we can identify the cosimplicial ∞\infty-category (QC⁑(ℒ​YΓ—YXn),𝔭nβˆ—)(\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}),\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{*}) with the cosimplicial ∞\infty-category (QC(β„’YΓ—YXn,𝔭n!)(\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n},\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{!}) via tensoring by the inverse of the relative dualizing sheaf ωℒ​YΓ—YXn/Y\omega_{\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}/Y} on each simplex. In particular, we obtain an identification of their limits.

Second, we can consider the cosimplicial ∞\infty-category (QC(β„’YΓ—YXn),𝔭n!)(\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}),\mathfrak{p}_{n}^{!}) as a diagram in the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rR\mathcal{P}r^{\rm R} of presentable ∞\infty-categories (with morphisms right adjoints). By [L2, Theorem 5.5.3.18], the calculation of the limit of the diagram does not depend on this choice of context. Then we can pass to the opposite ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories (with morphisms left adjoints). To calculate a limit in 𝒫​rR\mathcal{P}r^{\rm R} is the same as to calculate a colimit in 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}. But we have seen that the trace 𝒯​r​(β„‹)\mathcal{T}r(\mathcal{H}) is precisely the colimit of the dual simplicial diagram (QC(β„’YΓ—YXn),𝔭nβˆ—)(\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X_{n}),\mathfrak{p}_{n*}). Thus we conclude that the geometric realization colimβ‘πβˆ—B​(A)\colim\mathbf{N}_{*}^{B}(A) also calculates the ∞\infty-category QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y).

Finally, note that under this identification, the composition Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ΄βˆ—:QC⁑(XΓ—YX)β†’QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\pi_{*}\delta^{*}:\qc(X\times_{Y}X)\to\qc(\mathcal{L}Y) corresponds to the composition

QC⁑(XΓ—YX)≃𝐍0c​y​c​(A)→𝐍0B​(A)β†’colimβ‘πβˆ—c​y​c​(A)≃QC⁑(ℒ​Y)\qc(X\times_{Y}X)\simeq\mathbf{N}_{0}^{cyc}(A)\to\mathbf{N}_{0}^{B}(A)\to\colim\mathbf{N}_{*}^{cyc}(A)\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}Y)

which is precisely the trace 𝔱​𝔯\mathfrak{tr}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5