ScalingStacks

5.1. Centers and traces

We begin with a discussion of the general notions of centers and traces of associative algebra objects in closed symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-categories. This is a general version of the approach to topological Hochschild homology developed in [EKMM, Sh]. We then calculate the center and trace of the symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category of sheaves QC⁡(X)\qc(X) on a perfect stack XX (where we think of QC⁡(X)\qc(X) as an associative algebra object in the closed symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories).

Let 𝒮\mathcal{S} be a symmetric monoidal presentable ∞\infty-category. Recall that an associative algebra structure on A∈𝒮A\in\mathcal{S} is an object is equivalent to the structure of algebra over the ℰ1\mathcal{E}_{1} operad. We briefly recall the ∞\infty-category versions of two familiar facts from classical algebra.

First, there is the notion of the opposite associative algebra Aop∈𝒮A^{\rm op}\in\mathcal{S}. For this, recall that there is a map of operads τ:ℰ1→ℰ1\tau:\mathcal{E}_{1}\rightarrow\mathcal{E}_{1} determined by the action of the symmetric group Σ2\Sigma_{2} on the two contractible subspaces of ℰ1​(2)\mathcal{E}_{1}(2), and such that τ∘τ\tau\circ\tau is equivalent to the identity. Given an ℰ1\mathcal{E}_{1}-algebra AA, the pullback τ∗​A\tau^{*}A is by definition the opposite ℰ1\mathcal{E}_{1}-algebra AopA^{\rm op}.

Second, given two associative algebras A,B∈𝒮A,B\in\mathcal{S}, their monoidal product A⊗B∈𝒮A\otimes B\in\mathcal{S} carries a natural associative algebra structure. For this, recall that given two algebras AA, BB over any topological operad 𝒪\mathcal{O}, we have the structure of an 𝒪×𝒪\mathcal{O}\times\mathcal{O}-algebra on the monoidal product A⊗BA\otimes B. Since the term-wise diagonal map gives a map of operads 𝒪→𝒪×𝒪\mathcal{O}\rightarrow\mathcal{O}\times\mathcal{O}, we obtain an 𝒪\mathcal{O}-algebra structure on A⊗BA\otimes B by restriction along the diagonal.

Furthermore, any associative algebra A∈𝒮A\in\mathcal{S} is a left (as well as a right) module object over the associative algebra A⊗AopA\otimes A^{\rm op} via left and right multiplication.

Now assume further that 𝒮\mathcal{S} is a closed symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category. Then we have internal hom objects [L4, 2.7], and given A⊗AopA\otimes A^{\rm op}-modules M,NM,N, we can define the A⊗AopA\otimes A^{\rm op}-linear morphism object ℋ​o​mA⊗Aop​(M,N)∈𝒮{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(M,N)\in\mathcal{S}. Likewise, given left and right A⊗AopA\otimes A^{\rm op} modules M,N∈𝒮M,N\in\mathcal{S} we have a pairing M⊗A⊗AopN∈𝒮M\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}N\in\mathcal{S} defined by the two-sided bar construction [L4, 4.5] over A⊗AopA\otimes A^{\rm op}.

0NYB

Definition 5.1. Let AA be an associative algebra object in a closed symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category 𝒮\mathcal{S}.

  1. (1)

    The derived center or Hochschild cohomology 𝒵⁡(A)=HH∗⁡(A)∈𝒮\mathcal{Z}(A)=\hh^{*}(A)\in\mathcal{S} is the endomorphism object ℰ​n​dA⊗Aop​(A){\mathcal{E}nd}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(A) of AA as an AA-bimodule.

  2. (2)

    The derived trace or Hochschild homology 𝒯​r​(A)=HH∗⁡(A)∈𝒮\mathcal{T}r(A)=\hh_{*}(A)\in\mathcal{S} is the pairing object A⊗A⊗AopA{A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A} of AA with itself as an AA-bimodule.

In general, the center 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) is again an associative algebra object in 𝒮\mathcal{S}, and the trace 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) is an AA-module object in 𝒮\mathcal{S}. Furthermore, 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) comes with a canonical central morphism

𝔷:𝒵⁡(A)\textstyle{\mathfrak{z}:\mathcal{Z}(A)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}A\textstyle{A}F\textstyle{F\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F⁡(1A)\textstyle{F(1_{A})}

while 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) comes with a canonical trace morphism

𝔱​𝔯:A\textstyle{\mathfrak{tr}:A\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒯​r​(A)\textstyle{\mathcal{T}r(A)}A\textstyle{A\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}A⊗A⊗A1A\textstyle{A\otimes_{A\otimes A}1_{A}}

coequalizing left and right multiplication. When AA is in fact symmetric, 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) and 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) are again naturally symmetric algebra objects in 𝒮\mathcal{S}, though the symmetric algebra structure on 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) is different from its general associative algebra structure.

5.1.1. Cyclic bar construction

It is very useful to have versions of the Hochschild chain and cochain complexes which calculate the trace and center. In the setting of an associative algebra object AA in a monoidal ∞\infty-category 𝒮\mathcal{S}, they will take the form of a simplicial object 𝐍∗c​y​c​(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) and cosimplicial object 𝐍c​y​c∗​(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) such that the geometric realization colim⁡𝐍∗c​y​c​(A)\colim\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) is the trace 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) and the totalization lim𝐍c​y​c∗​(A)\lim\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) is the center 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A). (Note that simplicial and cosimplicial objects here are taken in the ∞\infty-categorical sense, and so the diagram identities hold up to coherent homotopies as in, e.g., [A], where the cyclic bar construction for A∞A_{\infty} H-spaces is developed.)

We construct the simplicial object 𝐍∗c​y​c​(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) and cosimplicial object 𝐍c​y​c∗​(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) as follows. Consider the adjunction

𝒮\textstyle{\mathcal{S}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F\scriptstyle{F}ModA​(𝒮)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G\scriptstyle{G}

where F(−)=A⊗−F(-)=A\otimes- is the induction, and GG is the forgetful functor. It determines a comonad S≃F​GS\simeq FG acting on ModA​(𝒮)\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{S}).

As in classical algebra, for any AA-module MM, the comonad SS provides a canonical augmented simplicial object C∗​(M)C_{*}(M) with terms

Cn−1​(M)≃(F​G)n​(M)≃A⊗n⊗MC_{n-1}(M)\simeq(FG)^{n}(M)\simeq A^{\otimes n}\otimes M

such that the geometric realization of C∗​(M)C_{*}(M) is naturally equivalent to MM. We will say that C∗​(M)C_{*}(M) is a simplicial resolution of MM.

We can apply this technique to produce the familiar cyclic bar construction. Consider the special case of the above adjunction

ModAop​(𝒮)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F\scriptstyle{F}ModA⊗Aop​(𝒮)\textstyle{\mathrm{Mod}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{S})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G\scriptstyle{G}

where F(−)=A⊗−F(-)=A\otimes- again is the induction, and GG is the forgetful functor from AA-bimodules to right AA-modules. Using the comonad S≃F​GS\simeq FG, we obtain a simplicial resolution C∗​(A)C_{*}(A) of the AA-bimodule AA whose terms Cn−1​(A)≃A⊗n+1C_{n-1}(A)\simeq A^{\otimes n+1} are AA-bimodules which are free as left AA-modules.

Now recall that the trace 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A) is defined by the self-pairing A⊗A⊗AopAA\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A. Since the tensor product commutes with colimits, in particular geometric realizations, we calculate

𝒯​r​(A)=A⊗A⊗AopA≃A⊗A⊗Aop|C∗​(A)|≃|A⊗A⊗AopC∗​(A)|.\mathcal{T}r(A)=A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A\simeq A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}|C_{*}(A)|\simeq|A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A)|.

Thus the geometric realization of A⊗A⊗AopC∗​(A)A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A) calculates the trace 𝒯​r​(A)\mathcal{T}r(A).

We write 𝐍∗c​y​c​(A)\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{*}(A) for the simplicial object A⊗A⊗AopC∗​(A)A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{*}(A) and refer to it as the Hochschild chain complex. Since AA is free as a right AA-module, the terms of the simplicial object C∗​(A)C_{*}(A) are free as AA-bimodules. Thus we can evaluate the terms of the Hochschild chain complex

𝐍nc​y​c​(A)=A⊗A⊗AopCn​(A)≃A⊗A⊗AopA⊗n+2≃A⊗n+1\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{n}(A)=A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}C_{n}(A)\simeq A\otimes_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}A^{\otimes n+2}\simeq A^{\otimes n+1}

In particular, there are equivalences 𝐍0c​y​c​(A)≃A\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{0}(A)\simeq A and 𝐍1c​y​c​(A)≃A⊗A\mathbf{N}^{cyc}_{1}(A)\simeq A\otimes A, and the two simplicial maps A⊗A→AA\otimes A\rightarrow A are the multiplication and the opposite multiplication of AA.

Similarly, recall that the center 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) is defined by the endomorphisms ℰ​n​dA⊗Aop​(A){\mathcal{E}nd}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(A). Since morphisms take colimits in the domain to limits, in particular geometric realizations to totalizations, we calculate

𝒵⁡(A)=ℰ​n​dA⊗Aop​(A)≃ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(|C∗​(A)|,A)≃|ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(C∗​(A),A)|\mathcal{Z}(A)={\mathcal{E}nd}_{A\otimes A^{\rm op}}(A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(|C_{*}(A)|,A)\simeq|{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A)|

Thus the totalization of ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(C∗​(A),A){\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A) calculates the center 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A).

We write 𝐍c​y​c∗​(A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{*}(A) for the cosimplicial object ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(C∗​(A),A){\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{*}(A),A) and refer to it as the Hochschild cochain complex. As before, we can evaluate the terms of the Hochschild cochain complex

𝐍c​y​cn​(A)=ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(Cn​(A),A)≃ℋ​o​mA⊗Ao​p​(A⊗n+2,A)≃ℋ​o​m​(A⊗n,A).\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{n}(A)={\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(C_{n}(A),A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}_{A\otimes A^{op}}(A^{\otimes n+2},A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}(A^{\otimes n},A).

In particular, there are equivalences 𝐍c​y​c0​(A)≃A\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{0}(A)\simeq A and 𝐍c​y​c1​(A)≃ℋ​o​m​(A,A)\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{1}(A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}(A,A), and the two cosimplicial maps A→ℋ​o​m​(A,A)A\to{\mathcal{H}om}(A,A) are induced by the left and right multiplication of AA.

5.1.2. Centers and traces for monoidal ∞\infty-categories

We will apply the above constructions in the following setting. We will always take 𝒮\mathcal{S} to be the ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rL{\mathcal{P}r}^{\rm L} of presentable ∞\infty-categories (with morphisms left adjoints). Then a monoidal presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒞\mathcal{C} is an associative algebra object in 𝒫​rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}. Thus we have the notion of its center (or Hochschild cohomology category) 𝒵⁡(𝒞)=Fun𝒞⊗𝒞op⁡(𝒞,𝒞)∈𝒫​rL\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})=\Fun_{\mathcal{C}\otimes\mathcal{C}^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{C})\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}, and its trace (or Hochschild homology category) 𝒯​r​(𝒞)=𝒞⊗𝒞⊗𝒞op𝒞∈𝒫​rL\mathcal{T}r(\mathcal{C})=\mathcal{C}\otimes_{\mathcal{C}\otimes\mathcal{C}^{\rm op}}\mathcal{C}\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}.

Now we will specialize further to a geometric setting. Let XX be a perfect stack, and take 𝒞\mathcal{C} to be the presentable stable ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X) equipped with its (symmetric) monoidal tensor product. To calculate the center and trace of QC⁡(X)\qc(X), we introduce the loop space

ℒ​X=Map⁡(S1,X)≃X×X×XX\mathcal{L}X=\Map(S^{1},X)\simeq X\times_{X\times X}X

where the fiber product is along two copies of the diagonal map.

0NYC

Corollary 5.2. Let XX be a perfect stack, and equip QC⁡(X)\qc(X) with its (symmetric) monoidal algebra structure given by tensor product. Then there are canonical equivalences (of symmetric monoidal) ∞\infty-categories

QC⁡(ℒ​X)≃𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X))≃𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X))\qc(\mathcal{L}X)\simeq\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X))\simeq\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X))
0NYD

Proof. By Theorem 4.7, we know that 𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X)), which is a tensor product, is also calculated by a fiber product

𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X))≃QC⁡(X×X×XX).\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X))\simeq\qc(X\times_{X\times X}X).

On the other hand, by Corollary 4.10, we know that 𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X))\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X)), which consists of functors, is also calculated by a tensor product

𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X))≃𝒯​r​(QC⁡(X)).\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X))\simeq\mathcal{T}r(\qc(X)).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5