ScalingStacks

5.2.2. Proof of Theorem 5.3

Now we will apply the preceding formalism to calculate the center of the monoidal ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X×YX)\qc(X\times_{Y}X). Recall that our aim is to show that there is a canonical equivalence

𝒵⁡(QC⁡(X×YX))≃QC⁡(ℒ​Y).\mathcal{Z}(\qc(X\times_{Y}X))\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}Y).

where ℒ​Y\mathcal{L}Y is the loop space of YY.

Consider the symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category QC⁡(X)\qc(X), together with the monoidal functor

Δ∗:QC⁡(X)→QC⁡(X×YX)\Delta_{*}:\qc(X)\to\qc(X\times_{Y}X)

obtained via pushforward along the relative diagonal Δ:X→X×YX\Delta:X\to X\times_{Y}X.

Set A=QC⁡(X×YX)A=\qc(X\times_{Y}X), and B=QC⁡(X)B=\qc(X). By the preceding discussion, the center 𝒵⁡(A)\mathcal{Z}(A) is the limit of the relative Hochschild cochain complex 𝐍B∗​(A)\mathbf{N}^{*}_{B}(A). Furthermore, its terms can be calculated

𝐍Bn​(A)≃ℋ​o​mB⊗Bop​(AB⊗n+1,B).\mathbf{N}_{B}^{n}(A)\simeq{\mathcal{H}om}_{B\otimes B^{\rm op}}(A_{B}^{\otimes n+1},B).

Applying the results of Section 4, we can rewrite each term in the form

𝐍Bn(A)≃QC(ℒY×YX×Y⋯×YX), with n+1 copies of X.\mathbf{N}_{B}^{n}(A)\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X\times_{Y}\cdots\times_{Y}X),\quad\mbox{ with $n+1$ copies of $X$.}

Here we have used the elementary identification

ℒY×YX×Y⋯×YX≃X×X×X((X×YX)×X⋯×X(X×YX))\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X\times_{Y}\cdots\times_{Y}X\simeq X\times_{X\times X}((X\times_{Y}X)\times_{X}\cdots\times_{X}(X\times_{Y}X))

where the left hand side has n+1n+1 copies of XX, and the right hand side has n+1n+1 copies of X×YXX\times_{Y}X.

We conclude that the terms of 𝐍B∗​(A)\mathbf{N}_{B}^{*}(A) are nothing more than the terms of the cosimplicial ∞\infty-category obtained by applying QC⁡(−)\qc(-) to the C̆ech simplicial stack induced by the map

p~:ℒ​Y×YX→ℒ​Y\tilde{p}:\mathcal{L}Y\times_{Y}X\to\mathcal{L}Y

obtained by base change from the original map p:X→Yp:X\to Y. It is straightforward to check that under this identification the coboundary maps are given by the usual C̆ech pullbacks. By assumption, pp satisfies descent, hence p~\tilde{p} satisfies descent, and thus the totalization lim𝐍B∗​(A)\lim\mathbf{N}_{B}^{*}(A) also calculates the ∞\infty-category QC⁡(ℒ​Y)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y).

Finally, note that under this identification, the composition δ∗​π∗:QC⁡(ℒ​Y)→QC⁡(X×YX)\delta_{*}\pi^{*}:\qc(\mathcal{L}Y)\to\qc(X\times_{Y}X) corresponds to the composition

QC⁡(ℒ​Y)≃lim𝐍B∗​(A)→𝐍B0​(A)→𝐍c​y​c0​(A)≃QC⁡(X×YX)\qc(\mathcal{L}Y)\simeq\lim\mathbf{N}_{B}^{*}(A)\to\mathbf{N}_{B}^{0}(A)\to\mathbf{N}_{cyc}^{0}(A)\simeq\qc(X\times_{Y}X)

which is precisely the central functor 𝔷\mathfrak{z}. This concludes the proof of Theorem 5.3.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5