ScalingStacks

0NXL

Proposition 4.1. Let ๐’ž\mathcal{C} be a stable presentable symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category, and Aโˆˆ๐’žA\in\mathcal{C} an associative algebra object.

  1. (1)

    For any ๐’ž\mathcal{C}-module โ„ณ\mathcal{M}, there is a canonical equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories

    ModAโก(๐’ž)โŠ—๐’žโ„ณโ‰ƒModAโก(โ„ณ).\Mod_{A}(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{M}\simeq\Mod_{A}(\mathcal{M}).
  2. (2)

    For Aโ€ฒโˆˆ๐’žA^{\prime}\in\mathcal{C} a second associative algebra, there is a canonical equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories

    ModAโŠ—Aโ€ฒโก(๐’ž)โ‰ƒModAโก(๐’ž)โŠ—๐’žModAโ€ฒโก(๐’ž).\Mod_{A\otimes A^{\prime}}(\mathcal{C})\simeq\Mod_{A}(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\Mod_{A^{\prime}}(\mathcal{C}).
  3. (3)

    The โˆž\infty-category of modules ModAโก(๐’ž)\Mod_{A}(\mathcal{C}) is dualizable as a ๐’ž\mathcal{C}-module with dual given by the โˆž\infty-category of modules ModAopโก(๐’ž)\Mod_{A^{\rm op}}(\mathcal{C}) over the opposite algebra.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5