ScalingStacks

0NX8

Proof. First note that pushforward p∗p_{*} along the perfect morphism pp is colimit preserving, hence (by adjunction) the pullback p∗​Mp^{*}M of a compact object M∈QC⁡(Y)M\in\qc(Y) is compact. In particular we find that the structure sheaf (the monoidal unit) on XX is compact, and hence that all dualizable objects are compact. Note also that the pullback of a dualizable object is always dualizable.

Now suppose that U→YU\to Y is any affine mapping to YY, and consider the base change XUX_{U} of XX to UU. By the definition of a perfect morphism applied to pp, this base change is itself a perfect stack. Let q:XU→Xq:X_{U}\to X denote the base change morphism, which is affine since YY has affine diagonal. If M∈QC⁡(X)M\in\qc(X) is any compact object and MU=q∗​MM_{U}=q^{*}M is its pullback to UU, then MUM_{U} is itself compact since q∗q_{*} preserves colimits:

Hom⁡(MU,colim⁡Ai)\displaystyle\Hom(M_{U},\colim A_{i}) ≃\displaystyle\simeq Hom⁡(q∗​M,colim⁡Ai)\displaystyle\Hom(q^{*}M,\colim A_{i})
≃\displaystyle\simeq Hom⁡(M,q∗​colim⁡Ai)\displaystyle\Hom(M,q_{*}\colim A_{i})
≃\displaystyle\simeq Hom⁡(M,colim⁡q∗​Ai)\displaystyle\Hom(M,\colim q_{*}A_{i})
≃\displaystyle\simeq colim⁡Hom⁡(M,q∗​Ai)\displaystyle\colim\Hom(M,q_{*}A_{i})
≃\displaystyle\simeq colim⁡Hom⁡(MU,Ai).\displaystyle\colim\Hom(M_{U},A_{i}).

Since UU itself is perfect, it follows that MUM_{U} is dualizable and (by Proposition 3.6) perfect. We now show that the pullback of MM to any affine is perfect. Assume that the map U→YU\rightarrow Y is surjective, so as a consequence XU→XX_{U}\rightarrow X is also surjective. Now let f:V→Xf:V\rightarrow X be any affine mapping to XX. We may form the Cartesian diagrams:

U×YV\textstyle{U\times_{Y}V\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f′\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}}q′\scriptstyle{q^{\prime}}XU\textstyle{X_{U}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}q\scriptstyle{q}U\textstyle{U\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}U\textstyle{U\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}X\textstyle{X\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Y\textstyle{Y}

We now verify that f∗​Mf^{*}M is perfect, given the hypotheses above. The fiber product U×YVU\times_{Y}V is affine, since YY has affine diagonal, and the map q′q^{\prime} is surjective since qq is. Since MUM_{U} is perfect, f′⁣∗​MU≃q′⁣∗​f∗​Mf^{\prime*}M_{U}\simeq q^{\prime*}f^{*}M is perfect, as well. Thus, in summary, we know that q′⁣∗​f∗​M=𝒪⁡(V×YU)⊗𝒪⁡(U)f∗​Mq^{\prime*}f^{*}M=\mathcal{O}(V\times_{Y}U)\otimes_{\mathcal{O}(U)}f^{*}M is perfect, where q′q^{\prime} is surjective, and hence f∗​Mf^{*}M is perfect. Since the pullback of MM to any affine is perfect, therefore MM is itself perfect by Definition 3.1 and hence (again by Proposition 3.6) dualizable. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5