ScalingStacks

0NWI

Proposition 3.6. For a derived stack XX, an object of QC⁡(X)\qc(X) is dualizable if and only if it is perfect.

0NWJ

Proof. Let M∈QC⁡(X)M\in\qc(X) be dualizable with dual M∨M^{\vee}. Then for any map η:Spec⁡A→X\eta:\Spec A\rightarrow X, the pullback η∗​M\eta^{*}M is dualizable with dual η∗​M∨\eta^{*}M^{\vee}. Dualizable objects of ModA\Mod_{A} are perfect, hence η∗​M\eta^{*}M is perfect and so by definition, MM is perfect.

Now suppose M∈QC⁡(X)M\in\qc(X) is perfect. Recall that by definition, we have

QC⁡(X)≃limSpec⁡A∈𝐴𝑓𝑓/XModA.\qc(X)\simeq\lim_{\Spec A\in{\it Aff}/X}\Mod_{A}.

Since MM is perfect, for any map η:Spec⁡A→X\eta:\Spec A\to X, the pullback η∗​M\eta^{*}M is perfect, hence dualizable. We take the value of the dual M∨M^{\vee} along a map η:Spec⁡A→X\eta:\Spec A\to X to be the dual of the pullback (η∗​M)∨(\eta^{*}M)^{\vee}. Note that M∨M^{\vee} is well-defined, since for any composite η∘ν:Spec⁡B→X\eta\circ\nu:\Spec B\rightarrow X, there is a natural equivalence (ν∗​η∗​M)∨≃ν∗​((η∗​M)∨)(\nu^{*}\eta^{*}M)^{\vee}\simeq\nu^{*}((\eta^{*}M)^{\vee}).

To exhibit MM and M∨M^{\vee} as dual to one another, we must construct the requisite unit and counit maps u:𝒪X→M⊗M∨u:\mathcal{O}_{X}\rightarrow M\otimes M^{\vee} and c:M∨⊗M→𝒪Xc:M^{\vee}\otimes M\rightarrow\mathcal{O}_{X}. Again using the definition of QC⁡(X)\qc(X) as a limit, to produce one of these maps, it suffices to define analogous maps for the pullbacks under each η:Spec⁡A→X\eta:\Spec A\rightarrow X which themselves are compatible under pullbacks. But the existence of such maps are an immediate consequence of the definition η∗​M∨=(η∗​M)∨\eta^{*}M^{\vee}=(\eta^{*}M)^{\vee}. Finally, to verify that the usual composititions M→M⊗M∨⊗M→MM\rightarrow M\otimes M^{\vee}\otimes M\rightarrow M and M∨→M∨⊗M⊗M∨→M∨M^{\vee}\rightarrow M^{\vee}\otimes M\otimes M^{\vee}\rightarrow M^{\vee} are equivalences, it suffices to check under pullbacks to affines. But this is a direct consequence of our definition of M∨M^{\vee} and the fact that pullbacks preserve tensor products. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5