Proposition 3.6. For a derived stack , an object of is dualizable if and only if it is perfect.
Proof. Let be dualizable with dual . Then for any map , the pullback is dualizable with dual . Dualizable objects of are perfect, hence is perfect and so by definition, is perfect.
Now suppose is perfect. Recall that by definition, we have
Since is perfect, for any map , the pullback is perfect, hence dualizable. We take the value of the dual along a map to be the dual of the pullback . Note that is well-defined, since for any composite , there is a natural equivalence .
To exhibit and as dual to one another, we must construct the requisite unit and counit maps and . Again using the definition of as a limit, to produce one of these maps, it suffices to define analogous maps for the pullbacks under each which themselves are compatible under pullbacks. But the existence of such maps are an immediate consequence of the definition . Finally, to verify that the usual composititions and are equivalences, it suffices to check under pullbacks to affines. But this is a direct consequence of our definition of and the fact that pullbacks preserve tensor products. ∎
Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5