ScalingStacks

0NX3

Lemma 3.18. Suppose XX is a derived scheme, and U​∐V→XU\coprod V\to X is an open Zariski cover. Then the following is a colimit diagram

U∩V\textstyle{U\cap V\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}U​∐V\textstyle{U\coprod V\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}X.\textstyle{X.}
0NX4

Proof. It suffices to show that the following diagram of algebra objects is Cartesian

𝒪X\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{X}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪U\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪U∩V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U\cap V}}

Let u:U​∐V→Xu:U\coprod V\to X denote the cover. Since the restriction u∗​(−)≃(−)⊗𝒪X(𝒪U×𝒪V)u^{*}(-)\simeq(-)\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X}}(\mathcal{O}_{U}\times\mathcal{O}_{V}) is conservative and preserves finite limits, it suffices to show that the restriction of the above diagram is Cartesian. But this is nothing more than the clearly Cartesian diagram

𝒪U×𝒪V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U}\times\mathcal{O}_{V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪U∩V×𝒪V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U\cap V}\times\mathcal{O}_{V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪U×𝒪U∩V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U}\times\mathcal{O}_{U\cap V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒪U∩V×𝒪U∩V\textstyle{\mathcal{O}_{U\cap V}\times\mathcal{O}_{U\cap V}}

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5