Definition 4.1.1. (T.5.2.8.1) A commutative square in an
-category is a map ,
which we write somewhat informally as
suppressing the homotopies. The space of lifts for is defined
as follows. Restricting to the diagonal ,
we get a morphism in , which can be viewed
as an object in the -category .
The diagram can be encoded as a pair of objects
and the space of lifts for is given as the mapping space
Remark 4.1.2. Let us denote the horizontal morphisms
in the above diagram by and . By the dual of T.5.5.5.12 we have a homotopy fiber sequence
over . Using T.5.5.5.12
again for the middle and the right term we obtain a presentation of
as the total
fiber of the square
In other words, we have a homotopy fiber sequence
over the point determined by the diagram .
Another reasonable definition of the space of lifts is as follows.
The inclusion
induces a restriction map
and we can consider the (automatically homotopy) fiber over the vertex
, which is an -category.
In T.5.2.8.22 it is proved that this -category is categorically
equivalent to (and in particular a Kan complex).
The next lemma shows that the space of lifts behaves well with respect
to pullback and pushout.
Proof.By symmetry, it is enough to prove (1). Observe that the prism
is a left cone on the simplicial set obtained by removing the initial
vertex. Formally,
We can therefore interpret the rectangle as a diagram in
(and hence ignore ). Since the projection
preserves and reflects limits (dual of T.1.2.13.8), the square
is a pullback square in . The universal property
of the pullback implies that we have a homotopy Cartesian square
which in turn induces a homotopy equivalence of homotopy fibers of
the vertical maps. Considering the given map as a point
in and considering the
induced equivalence on the homotopy fibers of the vertical maps, we
obtain by T.5.5.5.12 an equivalence
where and are and
viewed as objects of and
and are and
viewed as objects of . By the definition of the
space of lifts, this is precisely the equivalence .
β
Proof.Let be the Cartesian-coCartesian fibration
associated with the adjunction . Since
and are full subcategories of we can
think of the square as taking values in and it
does not change the space of lifts. Consider the diagram in
given by
where in the left square the horizontal arrows are coCartesian
and the rest of the data is given by the lifting property of coCartesian
edges. Since the inclusion of the spine
is inner anodyne, so is
(by T.2.3.2.4) and since is an inner fibration,
the diagram can be extended to
and we can denote the outer square by . We now claim that is a pushout square in
. For every , consider the induced
diagram
If , then the spaces on both
left corners are empty and if , then both horizontal arrows are equivalences. Either way, this is
a pullback square and hence is a pushout square. By 4.1.3
we get .
We can now factor the outer square
as
where the left square is and in the right square the
horizontal arrows are Cartesian and the square is determined by the
lifting property of Cartesian edges. Repeating the argument in the
dual form we get that is a pullback square and using 4.1.3
again we get and therefore
.
β
Products in the over-category are fibered products and products in
the under-category are just ordinary products (dual of T.1.2.13.8).
Hence, is the diagram , which we denote by . Thus, a point
corresponds to a lift in the diagram
in the category . Furthermore, the diagonal map
is induced from the diagonal map .
Namely, .
Our goal is therefore to compute the homotopy fiber of
over a given point
The projection induces
an equivalence
It follows that the fiber is the space of lifts in the diagram
in . By (the dual of) T.5.5.5.12, this space of lifts is homotopy equivalent to the mapping space
.
Recalling that , we see that this is
none other than the space of lifts for .
β