ScalingStacks

2.2 Pointed Unital and Reduced โˆž\infty-operads[0M38]

Recall from [Lur] the following definitions:

[0M2N]

Definition 2.2.1. (A.2.3.1.1, A.2.3.4.1) An โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ช\mathcal{O} is called:

  1. (1)

    Unital if for every object XX of ๐’ชยฏ\underline{\mathcal{O}}, the space of constants Mul๐’ชโ€‹(โˆ…,X)\text{Mul}_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\varnothing,X\right) is contractible. We denote the full โˆž\infty-category spanned by the unital โˆž\infty-operads by ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžun\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}.

  2. (2)

    Reduced if it is unital and the underlying โˆž\infty-category is a contractible space. We denote the full โˆž\infty-category spanned by the reduced โˆž\infty-operads by ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžred\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}.

[05X0]

Example 2.2.2. A symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category is unital if and only if the unit object is initial.

We proceed by listing the various adjunctions between the different โˆž\infty-categories of โˆž\infty-operads and โˆž\infty-categories. First, recall from A.2.1.4.10 that there is an underlying โˆž\infty-category functor (โˆ’)ยฏ:๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž\underline{\left(-\right)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty} and that this functor has a left adjoint ฮน:๐‚๐š๐ญโˆžโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆž\iota\colon\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}, which is a fully faithful embedding. Informally, ฮน\iota regards an โˆž\infty-category as an โˆž\infty-operad with empty higher (and nullary) multi-mapping spaces. On the other hand,

[05X1]

Lemma 2.2.3. The restriction of the forgetful functor (โˆ’)ยฏ:๐Ž๐ฉโˆžunโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž\underline{\left(-\right)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty} admits a right adjoint that takes every โˆž\infty-category ๐’ž\mathcal{C} to the coCartesian โˆž\infty-operad ๐’žโŠ”\mathcal{C}_{\sqcup} and the unit map of the adjunction ๐’žโŠ”ยฏโ†’๐’ž\underline{\mathcal{C}_{\sqcup}}\to\mathcal{C} is an equivalence (ie (โˆ’)โŠ”\left(-\right)_{\sqcup} is fully faithful).

[05X2]

Proof. The first claim follows from A.2.4.3.9 by passing to maximal โˆž\infty-subgroupoids. The second claim follows from A.2.4.3.11. โˆŽ

By A.2.3.1.9, the fully faithful embedding ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžunโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆž\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty} has a left adjoint given by tensoring with ๐”ผ0\mathbb{E}_{0} (which is a localization functor). From this follows,

[05X3]

Lemma 2.2.4. ๐”ผ0\mathbb{E}_{0} is the initial object of ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžred\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}.

[05X4]

Proof. The composition of forgetful functors

๐Ž๐ฉโˆžunโ†’๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}

has a left adjoint given as the composition of the corresponding left adjoints. The first one takes ฮ”0\Delta^{0} to ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ\mathbf{Triv} (by A.2.1.4.8) and the second takes ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ\mathbf{Triv} to ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏโŠ—๐”ผ0โ‰ƒ๐”ผ0\mathbf{Triv}\otimes\mathbb{E}_{0}\simeq\mathbb{E}_{0} (by A.2.3.1.9). Hence, for every reduced operad ๐’ซ\mathcal{P} (which is in particular unital), we get

Mapโก(๐”ผ0,๐’ซ)โ‰ƒMapโก(ฮ”0,๐’ซยฏ)โ‰ƒ๐’ซยฏโ‰ƒโ‰ƒฮ”0.\operatorname{Map}\left(\mathbb{E}_{0},\mathcal{P}\right)\simeq\operatorname{Map}\left(\Delta^{0},\underline{\mathcal{P}}\right)\simeq\underline{\mathcal{P}}^{\simeq}\simeq\Delta^{0}.

โˆŽ

One source of unital symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-categories is

[05X5]

Lemma 2.2.5. Let ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q} be a unital โˆž\infty-operad and let ๐’ž\mathcal{C} be a symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category. The symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category Alg๐’ฌโก(๐’ž)\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right) is also unital.

[05X6]

Proof. By A.3.2.4.4, the โˆž\infty-operad Alg๐’ฌโก(๐’ž)โŠ—โ†’๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)^{\otimes}\to\mathbf{Fin}_{*} is also a symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category and so we only need to show that the unit object of Alg๐’ฌโก(๐’ž)\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right) is initial. Since ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q} is unital, the canonical map ๐’ฌโ†’๐”ผ0โŠ—๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q}\to\mathbb{E}_{0}\otimes\mathcal{Q} is an equivalence of โˆž\infty-operads (by A.2.3.1.9) and therefore the forgetful functor

Algยฏ๐”ผ0โŠ—๐’ฌโ€‹(๐’ž)โ‰ƒAlgยฏ๐”ผ0โ€‹(Alg๐’ฌโก(๐’ž))โ†’Algยฏ๐’ฌโ€‹(๐’ž)\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathbb{E}_{0}\otimes\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\simeq\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathbb{E}_{0}}\left(\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\right)\to\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)

is an equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories. On the other hand, by A.2.1.3.10 we have

Algยฏ๐”ผ0(Alg๐’ฌ(๐’ž))โ‰ƒAlgยฏ๐’ฌ(๐’ž)1/,\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathbb{E}_{0}}\left(\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\right)\simeq\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)_{1/},

where 1โˆˆAlgยฏ๐’ฌโ€‹(๐’ž)1\in\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right) is the unit object and the projection Algยฏ๐’ฌ(๐’ž)1/โ†’Algยฏ๐’ฌ(๐’ž)\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)_{1/}\to\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right) is an equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories if and only if 11 is initial (T.1.2.12.5). โˆŽ

[0M2P]

Definition 2.2.6. The โˆž\infty-category of pointed โˆž\infty-categories is denoted by ๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž,โˆ—=(๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž)ฮ”0/\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty,*}=\left(\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}\right)_{\Delta^{0}/}. The โˆž\infty-category of pointed โˆž\infty-operads is denoted by ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—=๐Ž๐ฉโˆžร—๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž,โˆ—\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}=\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\times_{\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}}\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty,*}. We also denote by ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} and ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—red\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} the corresponding โˆž\infty-categories of pointed unital (resp. reduced) โˆž\infty-operads.

[05X7]

Remark 2.2.7. Using 2.1.1, we have an equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ‰ƒ(๐Ž๐ฉโˆž)๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ/\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\simeq\left(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\right)_{\mathbf{Triv}/}. Since ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏโ†’๐”ผ0\mathbf{Triv}\to\mathbb{E}_{0} is an equivalence after tensoring with ๐”ผ0\mathbb{E}_{0}, we get ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—unโ‰ƒ(๐Ž๐ฉโˆžun)๐”ผ0/\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\simeq\left(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\right)_{\mathbb{E}_{0}/} and therefore also ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—redโ‰ƒ(๐Ž๐ฉโˆžred)๐”ผ0/\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}})_{\mathbb{E}_{0}/}. We allow ourselves to pass freely between the two points of view on (unital, reduced) pointed โˆž\infty-operads.

[05X8]

Remark 2.2.8. Observe that by 2.2.4, the projection ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—redโ†’๐Ž๐ฉโˆžred\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\to\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} is an equivalence. Hence, the inclusion ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžredโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆžun\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} induces a functor

๐Ž๐ฉโˆžredโ‰ƒ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—redโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un.\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}.

Moreover, it exhibits ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžred\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} as the full subcategory of ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} spanned by the reduced objects with respect to the underlying โˆž\infty-category functor (โˆ’)ยฏ:๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—unโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž\underline{\left(-\right)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty} in the sense of 2.1.4. Thus, the two notions of โ€œreduced โˆž\infty-operadโ€ coincide.

We now apply the general observations from the previous subsection to deduce the following:

[05X9]

Proposition 2.2.9. The inclusion

๐Ž๐ฉโˆžredโ‰ƒ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—redโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}

has a right adjoint (โˆ’)red\left(-\right)^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}. Moreover, for a pointed unital โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q} the value of the right adjoint is given by the pullback

๐’ฌred\textstyle{\mathcal{Q}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’ฌ\textstyle{\mathcal{Q}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐”ผโˆž\textstyle{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’ฌยฏโŠ”\textstyle{\underline{\mathcal{Q}}_{\sqcup}}

in the โˆž\infty-category ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}. Furthermore, the top map can be taken to be the counit of the adjunction at ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q}.

[05XA]

Proof. We need to verify the hypothesis of 2.1.5. The underlying โˆž\infty-category functor L:๐Ž๐ฉโˆžunโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆžL\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty} is a composition of two functors ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžunโ†’๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}. The first is a right adjoint by A.2.3.1.9 and the second is a right adjoint by A.2.1.4.10. Hence, the composition is a right adjoint as well and therefore preserves limits. Moreover, by 2.2.3, LL is also a left adjoint and its right adjoint is fully faithful. Hence, the functor ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—unโ†’๐‚๐š๐ญโˆž,โˆ—\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty,*} also has a fully faithful right adjoint and we have (๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un)redโ‰ƒ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—red\left(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\right)^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}. Finally, by 2.1.5, the inclusion ๐Ž๐ฉโˆžredโ‰ƒ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—redโ†ช๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} admits a right adjoint with the stated description. โˆŽ

[0M2Q]

Definition 2.2.10. A unital โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q} and an object Xโˆˆ๐’ฌยฏX\in\underline{\mathcal{Q}} determine a pointed unital โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ฌXโˆˆ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—un\mathcal{Q}_{X}\in\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}. We denote End๐’ฌredโก(X):=(๐’ฌX)red\operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{Q}}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\left(X\right):=\left(\mathcal{Q}_{X}\right)^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} and call it the reduced endomorphism โˆž\infty-operad of XX in ๐’ฌ\mathcal{Q}.

We can describe the reduced โˆž\infty-operad End๐’ฌredโก(X)\operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{Q}}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\left(X\right) informally as follows. For every mโˆˆโ„•m\in\mathbb{N}, denote by X(m)X^{\left(m\right)} the mm-tuple (X,โ€ฆ,X)\left(X,\dots,X\right). The space of mm-ary operations is the โ€œsubspaceโ€ of Mul๐’ฌโ€‹(X(m),X)\text{Mul}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X^{\left(m\right)},X\right) of those maps that are reduced in the sense that plugging the unique constant in all arguments but one results in an identity morphism Xโ†’XX\to X. We end this subsection by making the above description precise in a special case of a symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category. For this, we first need to analyze the way multi-mapping spaces interact with limits of โˆž\infty-operads.

For every integer mm, there is a functor hโ€‹G(m):hโ€‹๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ†’hโ€‹๐’ฎhG^{(m)}\colon h\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\to h\mathcal{S}, that takes each โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ซ\mathcal{P} pointed by an object XX to the space Mul๐’ซโก(X(m),X)\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(X^{(m)},X\right) and a map of pointed โˆž\infty-operads f:๐’ซโ†’๐’ฌf\colon\mathcal{P}\to\mathcal{Q} to the homotopy class of the induced map on multi-mapping spaces Mul๐’ซโก(X(m),X)โ†’Mul๐’ฌโก(fโ€‹(X)(m),fโก(X))\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{P}}(X^{(m)},X)\to\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{Q}}(f(X)^{(m)},f(X)).

[05XB]

Lemma 2.2.11. For every integer mm, there is a limit-preserving functor G(m):๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ†’๐’ฎG^{(m)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\to\mathcal{S}, that lifts the functor hโ€‹G(m):hโ€‹๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ†’hโ€‹๐’ฎhG^{(m)}\colon h\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\to h\mathcal{S}.

[05XC]

Proof. Recall the combinatorial simplicial model category ๐๐Ž๐ฉโˆž\mathbf{POp}_{\infty} of โˆž\infty-preoperads, whose underlying โˆž\infty-category is ๐Ž๐ฉโˆž\mathbf{Op}_{\infty} (see A.2.1.4). Let ๐’ตยฏ0โІ๐’ตยฏ1โІ๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0}\subseteq\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1}\subseteq\mathbf{Fin}_{*} be the following subcategories:

  1. (1)

    The category ๐’ตยฏ0\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0} is discrete and contains only the objects โŸจ1โŸฉ\left\langle 1\right\rangle and โŸจmโŸฉ\left\langle m\right\rangle.

  2. (2)

    The category ๐’ตยฏ1\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1} contains ๐’ตยฏ0\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0} together with a unique non-identity morphism, which is the active map ฮฑ:โŸจmโŸฉโ†’โŸจ1โŸฉ\alpha\colon\left\langle m\right\rangle\to\left\langle 1\right\rangle.

We endow ๐’ตยฏ0\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0} and ๐’ตยฏ1\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1} with the induced (trivial) marking. Unwinding the definition, for any โˆž\infty-operad ๐’ซ\mathcal{P}, the simplicial set Map๐๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโก(๐’ตยฏ0,๐’ซโ™ฎ)\operatorname{Map}_{\mathbf{POp}_{\infty}}\left(\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0},\mathcal{P}^{\natural}\right) is isomorphic to ๐’ซโŸจmโŸฉโ‰ƒร—๐’ซโŸจ1โŸฉโ‰ƒ\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\simeq}\times\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle 1\right\rangle}^{\simeq}. Moreover, given

Xยฏ=(X1โŠ•โ‹ฏโŠ•Xm,Y)โˆˆ๐’ซโŸจmโŸฉโ‰ƒร—๐’ซโŸจ1โŸฉโ‰ƒ,\underline{X}=\left(X_{1}\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{m},Y\right)\in\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\simeq}\times\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle 1\right\rangle}^{\simeq},

the fiber of the fibration (hence also the homotopy fiber)

ฯ†๐’ซ:Map๐๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโก(๐’ตยฏ1,๐’ซโ™ฎ)โ†’Map๐๐Ž๐ฉโˆžโก(๐’ตยฏ0,๐’ซโ™ฎ)โ‰ƒ๐’ซโŸจmโŸฉโ‰ƒร—๐’ซโŸจ1โŸฉโ‰ƒ\varphi_{\mathcal{P}}\colon\operatorname{Map}_{\mathbf{POp}_{\infty}}\left(\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1},\mathcal{P}^{\natural}\right)\to\operatorname{Map}_{\mathbf{POp}_{\infty}}\left(\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0},\mathcal{P}^{\natural}\right)\simeq\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\simeq}\times\mathcal{P}_{\left\langle 1\right\rangle}^{\simeq}

over Xยฏ\underline{X} is homotopy equivalent to the multi-mapping space Mul๐’ซโก({X1,โ€ฆ,Xm};Y)\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\left\{X_{1},\dots,X_{m}\right\};Y\right). Let ๐’ต0\mathcal{Z}_{0} and ๐’ต1\mathcal{Z}_{1} be โˆž\infty-operads that are fibrant replacements of ๐’ตยฏ0\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0} and ๐’ตยฏ1\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1}, respectively. Moreover, let f:๐’ต0โ†’๐’ต1f\colon\mathcal{Z}_{0}\to\mathcal{Z}_{1} be a map corresponding to the inclusion ๐’ตยฏ0โ†ช๐’ตยฏ1\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0}\hookrightarrow\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{1}. The functor F:(๐Ž๐ฉโˆž)๐’ต0/โ†’๐’ฎF\colon\left(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\right)_{\mathcal{Z}_{0}/}\to\mathcal{S}, co-represented by f:๐’ต0โ†’๐’ต1f\colon\mathcal{Z}_{0}\to\mathcal{Z}_{1}, preserves limits. Furthermore, its value on g:๐’ต0โ†’๐’ซg\colon\mathcal{Z}_{0}\to\mathcal{P} fits by T.5.5.5.12 into a fiber sequence

Fโก(๐’ซ)\textstyle{F\left(\mathcal{P}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Mapโก(๐’ต1,๐’ซ)\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(\mathcal{Z}_{1},\mathcal{P}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฮ”0\textstyle{\Delta^{0}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}[g]\scriptstyle{\left[g\right]}Mapโก(๐’ต0,๐’ซ),\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(\mathcal{Z}_{0},\mathcal{P}\right),}

which therefore identifies Fโก(๐’ซ)F\left(\mathcal{P}\right) with Mul๐’ซโก({X1,โ€ฆ,Xm};Y)\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\left\{X_{1},\dots,X_{m}\right\};Y\right) for the objects X1,โ€ฆ,Xm,Yโˆˆ๐’ซX_{1},\dots,X_{m},Y\in\mathcal{P} determined by gg.

Let U:๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ†’(๐Ž๐ฉโˆž)๐’ต0/U\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\to\left(\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}\right)_{\mathcal{Z}_{0}/} be the functor induced from the map ๐’ต0โ†’๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ\mathcal{Z}_{0}\to\mathbf{Triv} corresponding to the inclusion ๐’ตยฏ0โ†ช๐“๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ\overline{\mathcal{Z}}_{0}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Triv}. By T.1.2.13.8, the functor UU preserves limits. We define G(m):๐Ž๐ฉโˆž,โˆ—โ†’๐’ฎG^{(m)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}\to\mathcal{S} to be the composition of FF and UU, which is limit-preserving as a composition of limit preserving-functors. Unwinding the definitions, G(m)G^{(m)} indeed lifts hโ€‹G(m)hG^{(m)}. โˆŽ

Let ๐’ž\mathcal{C} be a symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category that is unital as an โˆž\infty-operad (ie the unit is an initial object). For every Xโˆˆ๐’žX\in\mathcal{C} and mโˆˆโ„•m\in\mathbb{N} we have a canonical map ฯƒ:XโŠ”mโ†’XโŠ—m\sigma\colon X^{\sqcup m}\to X^{\otimes m} defined as follows. For k=1,โ€ฆ,mk=1,\dots,m, on the kk-th summand of XโŠ”mX^{\sqcup m} the map is the tensor product of mm maps, where the kk-th one is Xโ€‹โŸถIdโ€‹XX\overset{\operatorname{Id}}{\longrightarrow}X and the rest are the unique map 1๐’žโ†’X1_{\mathcal{C}}\to X.

[05XD]

Lemma 2.2.12. Let ๐’ž\mathcal{C} be a symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-category that is unital as an โˆž\infty-operad and that admits finite coproducts. For every Xโˆˆ๐’žX\in\mathcal{C} and every mโˆˆโ„•m\in\mathbb{N}, there is a fiber sequence

End๐’žredโก(X)โ€‹(m)โ†’Map๐’žโก(XโŠ—m,X)โ†’ฯƒโˆ—Map๐’žโก(XโŠ”m,X),\operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\left(X\right)\left(m\right)\to\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{C}}\left(X^{\otimes m},X\right)\xrightarrow{\sigma^{*}}\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{C}}\left(X^{\sqcup m},X\right),

where the fiber is taken over the fold map โˆ‡:XโŠ”mโ†’X\nabla\colon X^{\sqcup m}\to X.

[05XE]

Proof. By 2.2.9 we have a pullback square of pointed unital โˆž\infty-operads

End๐’žredโก(X)\textstyle{\operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\left(X\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’ž\textstyle{\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐”ผโˆž\textstyle{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’žยฏโŠ”,\textstyle{\underline{\mathcal{C}}_{\sqcup},}

which, by 2.2.11, induces a pullback square of multi-mapping spaces

End๐’žredโก(X)โ€‹(m)\textstyle{\operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\left(X\right)\left(m\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Mul๐’žโก(X(m),X)\textstyle{\operatorname{Mul}_{\mathcal{C}}\left(X^{\left(m\right)},X\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐”ผโˆžโ€‹(m)\textstyle{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}\left(m\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Mul๐’žยฏโŠ”โก(X(m),X).\textstyle{\operatorname{Mul}_{\underline{\mathcal{C}}_{\sqcup}}\left(X^{\left(m\right)},X\right).}

The bottom map is the map ฮ”0โ†’Map๐’žโก(XโŠ”m,X)\Delta^{0}\to\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{C}}\left(X^{\sqcup m},X\right) that chooses the fold map since it is induced from the map ๐”ผโˆž=(ฮ”0)โŠ”โ†’๐’žยฏโŠ”\mathbb{E}_{\infty}=\left(\Delta^{0}\right)_{\sqcup}\to\underline{\mathcal{C}}_{\sqcup}. The right vertical map is induced by pre-composition with the map ฯƒ:XโŠ”mโ†’XโŠ—m\sigma\colon X^{\sqcup m}\to X^{\otimes m}, since it is induced by the adjunction

(โˆ’)โŠ”:๐‚๐š๐ญโˆžโ‡†๐Ž๐ฉโˆžun:(โˆ’)ยฏ.\left(-\right)_{\sqcup}\colon\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}\leftrightarrows\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\colon\underline{\left(-\right)}.

โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source ยท 1808.06006v3