Example 2.2.2. A symmetric monoidal -category is unital if and only if the
unit object is initial.
We proceed by listing the various adjunctions between the different
-categories of -operads and -categories.
First, recall from A.2.1.4.10 that there is an underlying -category
functor and that this functor
has a left adjoint , which is a fully faithful embedding.
Informally, regards an -category as an -operad
with empty higher (and nullary) multi-mapping spaces. On the other
hand,
Lemma 2.2.3.The restriction of the forgetful functor
admits a right adjoint
that takes every -category to the coCartesian
-operad and the unit map of the adjunction
is an equivalence
(ie is fully faithful).
has a left adjoint given as the composition of the corresponding left
adjoints. The first one takes to (by
A.2.1.4.8) and the second takes to
(by A.2.3.1.9). Hence, for every reduced operad (which
is in particular unital), we get
โ
One source of unital symmetric monoidal -categories is
Proof.By A.3.2.4.4, the -operad
is also a symmetric monoidal -category and so we only need to
show that the unit object of
is initial. Since is unital, the canonical map
is an equivalence of -operads (by A.2.3.1.9) and therefore
the forgetful functor
is an equivalence of -categories. On the other hand, by A.2.1.3.10
we have
where
is the unit object and the projection
is an equivalence of -categories if and only if is initial
(T.1.2.12.5).
โ
Definition 2.2.6. The -category of pointed -categories
is denoted by . The -category
of pointed -operads is denoted by .
We also denote by and the corresponding -categories
of pointed unital (resp. reduced) -operads.
Remark 2.2.7. Using 2.1.1,
we have an equivalence of -categories .
Since is an equivalence after tensoring with
, we get
and therefore also .
We allow ourselves to pass freely between the two points of view on
(unital, reduced) pointed -operads.
Remark 2.2.8. Observe that by 2.2.4, the projection
is an equivalence. Hence, the inclusion induces
a functor
Moreover, it exhibits as the full subcategory of
spanned by the reduced objects with respect to the underlying -category
functor in the sense
of 2.1.4. Thus, the two notions of
โreduced -operadโ coincide.
We now apply the general observations from the previous subsection
to deduce the following:
Proof.We need to verify the hypothesis of 2.1.5.
The underlying -category functor is a composition of two functors .
The first is a right adjoint by A.2.3.1.9 and the second is a right adjoint by A.2.1.4.10. Hence, the composition is a right adjoint as well and therefore preserves limits.
Moreover, by 2.2.3, is also a left adjoint and its right adjoint is fully faithful.
Hence, the functor also has a fully faithful right adjoint and we have .
Finally, by
2.1.5, the inclusion admits a right adjoint with the stated description.
โ
Definition 2.2.10. A unital -operad
and an object determine
a pointed unital -operad . We
denote
and call it the reduced endomorphism -operad of
in .
We can describe the reduced -operad
informally as follows. For every , denote by the -tuple .
The space of -ary operations is the โsubspaceโ of
of those maps that are reduced in the sense that plugging the unique
constant in all arguments but one results in an identity morphism
. We end this subsection by making the above description
precise in a special case of a symmetric monoidal -category.
For this, we first need to analyze the way multi-mapping spaces interact with limits of -operads.
For every integer , there is a functor , that takes each -operad
pointed by an object to the space and a map of pointed -operads to the homotopy class of the induced map on multi-mapping spaces
.
Proof.Recall the combinatorial simplicial model category of -preoperads, whose underlying -category is (see A.2.1.4).
Let
be the following subcategories:
(1)
The category is discrete and contains
only the objects and .
(2)
The category contains
together with a unique non-identity morphism, which is the active map
.
We endow and
with the induced (trivial) marking. Unwinding the definition, for
any -operad , the simplicial set
is isomorphic to .
Moreover, given
the fiber of the fibration (hence also the homotopy fiber)
over is homotopy equivalent to the multi-mapping
space .
Let and be -operads
that are fibrant replacements of and
, respectively. Moreover, let
be a map corresponding to the inclusion .
The functor ,
co-represented by , preserves
limits. Furthermore, its value on fits by T.5.5.5.12 into a fiber sequence
which therefore identifies with
for the objects determined by .
Let be the functor induced from the map corresponding to the inclusion . By T.1.2.13.8, the functor preserves limits. We define to be the composition of and , which is limit-preserving as a composition of limit preserving-functors. Unwinding the definitions, indeed lifts .
โ
Let be a symmetric monoidal -category that
is unital as an -operad (ie the unit is an initial object).
For every and we have a canonical
map defined as follows. For
, on the -th summand of the map
is the tensor product of maps, where the -th one is
and the rest are the unique map .
Lemma 2.2.12.Let
be a symmetric monoidal -category that is unital as an -operad and that admits finite coproducts. For every
and every , there is a fiber sequence
Proof.By 2.2.9 we have a pullback square
of pointed unital -operads
which, by 2.2.11, induces a pullback square of multi-mapping
spaces
The bottom map is the map
that chooses the fold map since it is induced from the map .
The right vertical map is induced by pre-composition with the
map , since it is induced by the adjunction