ScalingStacks

2.1 Adjunctions and Under-categories[0M37]

We begin with some formal general observations on adjunctions and under-categories.

[05WQ]

Lemma 2.1.1. Let R:π’Ÿβ‡†π’ž:LR\colon\mathcal{D}\leftrightarrows\mathcal{C}\penalty\mskip 6.0mu plus 1.0mu\mathpunct{}\nonscript\mkern-3.0mu{:}\mskip 2.0muL be an adjunction between ∞\infty-categories. For every object Xβˆˆπ’žX\in\mathcal{C} there is a canonical equivalence of ∞\infty-categories π’ŸL(X)/β‰ƒπ’ŸΓ—π’žπ’žX/\mathcal{D}_{L\left(X\right)/}\simeq\mathcal{D}\times_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{C}_{X/}.

[05WR]

Proof. We denote the ∞\infty-category π’ŸΓ—π’žπ’žX/\mathcal{D}\times_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{C}_{X/} by π’ŸX/\mathcal{D}_{X/}. Let Ξ·:Xβ†’R​L​(X)\eta\colon X\to RL\left(X\right) be the XX-component of the unit of the adjunction L⊣RL\dashv R. By T.2.1.2.1, the projections p0:π’žΞ·/β†’π’žX/p_{0}\colon\mathcal{C}_{\eta/}\to\mathcal{C}_{X/} and p1:π’žΞ·/β†’π’žRL(X)/p_{1}\colon\mathcal{C}_{\eta/}\to\mathcal{C}_{RL\left(X\right)/} are left fibrations. Moreover, since Ξ”{1}β†ͺΞ”1\Delta^{\left\{1\right\}}\hookrightarrow\Delta^{1} is right anodyne, the map p1p_{1} is an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. By T.2.2.3.3, we can choose an inverse p1βˆ’1:π’žRL(X)/β†’π’žΞ·/p_{1}^{-1}\colon\mathcal{C}_{RL\left(X\right)/}\to\mathcal{C}_{\eta/} to p1p_{1} that strictly commutes with the projections to π’ž\mathcal{C}. We obtain a commutative diagram of simplicial sets

π’ŸL(X)/\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{L\left(X\right)/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’žRL(X)/\textstyle{\mathcal{C}_{RL\left(X\right)/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}p0​p1βˆ’1\scriptstyle{p_{0}p_{1}^{-1}}π’žX/\textstyle{\mathcal{C}_{X/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’Ÿ\textstyle{\mathcal{D}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ž\textstyle{\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ž.\textstyle{\mathcal{C}.}

There is an induced map from the upper left corner to the pullback of the outer rectangle without the upper left corner, which is another commutative diagram of simplicial sets

π’ŸL(X)/\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{L\left(X\right)/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ŸX/\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{X/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’Ÿ.\textstyle{\mathcal{D}.}

Since left fibrations are closed under base change (T.2.1.2.1), the vertical maps are left fibrations over π’Ÿ\mathcal{D}. Hence, to show that the top map is an equivalence it is enough to show that the induced map on fibers is a homotopy equivalence (T.2.2.3.3). For every Yβˆˆπ’ŸY\in\mathcal{D} we get a map

Mapπ’ŸR⁑(L⁑(X),Y)β†’Mapπ’žR⁑(X,R⁑(Y)),\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{D}}^{R}\left(L\left(X\right),Y\right)\to\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,R\left(Y\right)\right),

which is by construction obtained by applying the functor RR and pre-composing with the unit Ξ·:Xβ†’R​L​(X)\eta\colon X\to RL\left(X\right). By the universal property of the unit map this is a homotopy equivalence for all Yβˆˆπ’ŸY\in\mathcal{D} and therefore the map π’ŸL(X)/β†’π’ŸX/\mathcal{D}_{L\left(X\right)/}\to\mathcal{D}_{X/} is an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. ∎

[05WS]

Lemma 2.1.2. Let L:π’žβ‡†π’Ÿ:RL\colon\mathcal{C}\leftrightarrows\mathcal{D}\penalty\mskip 6.0mu plus 1.0mu\mathpunct{}\nonscript\mkern-3.0mu{:}\mskip 2.0muR be an adjunction of ∞\infty-categories and let Xβˆˆπ’žX\in\mathcal{C}. The induced functor

LX:π’žX/β†’π’ŸL(X)/L_{X}\colon\mathcal{C}_{X/}\to\mathcal{D}_{L\left(X\right)/}

has a right adjoint RXR_{X}. Moreover, if RR is fully faithful, then RXR_{X} is also fully faithful.

[05WT]

Proof. Let p:β„³β†’Ξ”1p\colon\mathcal{M}\to\Delta^{1} be the coCartesian fibration associated with the functor LL (which is also Cartesian, since LL has a right adjoint). We can assume that we have a commutative diagram

Ξ”1Γ—π’ž\textstyle{\Delta^{1}\times\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s\scriptstyle{s}β„³\textstyle{\mathcal{M}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}p\scriptstyle{p}Ξ”1,\textstyle{\Delta^{1},}

such that s|Ξ”{0}Γ—π’ž=Ids|_{\Delta^{\left\{0\right\}}\times\mathcal{C}}=\operatorname{Id}, s|Ξ”{1}Γ—π’ž=Ls|_{\Delta^{\left\{1\right\}}\times\mathcal{C}}=L and s|Ξ”1Γ—{X}s|_{\Delta^{1}\times\left\{X\right\}} is a coCartesian edge of β„³\mathcal{M} for every Xβˆˆπ’žX\in\mathcal{C} (combine T.5.2.1.1 and T.5.2.1.3). It is clear from T.1.2.9.2 that for any pair of ∞\infty-categories with objects Xβˆˆπ’žX\in\mathcal{C} and Yβˆˆπ’ŸY\in\mathcal{D} there is a canonical isomorphism

(π’žΓ—π’Ÿ)(X,Y)/β‰ƒπ’žX/Γ—π’ŸY/.\left(\mathcal{C}\times\mathcal{D}\right)_{\left(X,Y\right)/}\simeq\mathcal{C}_{X/}\times\mathcal{D}_{Y/}.

Hence, we get an induced commutative diagram

Ξ”1Γ—π’žX/≃(Ξ”1Γ—π’ž)(0,X)/\textstyle{\Delta^{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{X/}\simeq\left(\Delta^{1}\times\mathcal{C}\right)_{\left(0,X\right)/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s\scriptstyle{s}β„³X/\textstyle{\mathcal{M}_{X/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}pX\scriptstyle{p_{X}}Ξ”1≃Δ0/1.\textstyle{\Delta^{1}\simeq\Delta_{0/}^{1}.}

The functor pXp_{X} is a Cartesian and coCartesian fibration by the duals of T.2.4.3.1(1) and T.2.4.3.2(1). Moreover, an edge in β„³X/\mathcal{M}_{X/} is (co)Cartesian if and only if its projection to β„³\mathcal{M} is (co)Cartesian by the duals of T.2.4.3.1(2) and T.2.4.3.2(2), which shows that the functor LXL_{X} is associated with pXp_{X}. It follows that LXL_{X} has a right adjoint RXR_{X}.

Assuming that RR is fully faithful, we will show that RXR_{X} is fully faithful by showing that the counit of the adjunction LX⊣RXL_{X}\dashv R_{X} is an equivalence. For every object, the counit map is an edge of β„³X/\mathcal{M}_{X/}. Since the projection β„³X/β†’β„³\mathcal{M}_{X/}\to\mathcal{M} is conservative, it is enough to show that the counit map of LX⊣RXL_{X}\dashv R_{X} is mapped to the counit map of L⊣RL\dashv R. Indeed, for an object Yβˆˆπ’Ÿβ‰ƒβ„³|Ξ”{1}Y\in\mathcal{D}\simeq\mathcal{M}|_{\Delta^{\left\{1\right\}}}, we choose a Cartesian edge e:R⁑(Y)β†’Ye\colon R\left(Y\right)\to Y and a coCartesian edge d:R⁑(Y)β†’L⁑(R⁑(Y))d\colon R\left(Y\right)\to L\left(R\left(Y\right)\right), and combine them into a commutative diagram of the form:

Ξ›02\textstyle{\Lambda_{0}^{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}β„³\textstyle{\mathcal{M}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}p\scriptstyle{p}Ξ”2\textstyle{\Delta^{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ξ”1,\textstyle{\Delta^{1},}

where f|Ξ”{0,1}=df|_{\Delta^{\left\{0,1\right\}}}=d and f|Ξ”{0,2}=ef|_{\Delta^{\left\{0,2\right\}}}=e. Since dd is coCartesian, there exists a lift fΒ―:Ξ”2β†’β„³\overline{f}\colon\Delta^{2}\to\mathcal{M} that gives an edge

fΒ―|Ξ”{1,2}=c:L⁑(R⁑(Y))β†’Y\overline{f}|_{\Delta^{\left\{1,2\right\}}}=c\colon L\left(R\left(Y\right)\right)\to Y

that is isomorphic to the counit map of the adjunction L⊣RL\dashv R at YY in the homotopy category hβ€‹π’Ÿh\mathcal{D}. We can similarly construct the counit map for an object of β„³X/\mathcal{M}_{X/}. The assertion now follows from the above characterization of (co)Cartesian edges in β„³X/\mathcal{M}_{X/}. ∎

[05WU]

Lemma 2.1.3. Let F:π’žβ†’π’ŸF\colon\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D} be a functor that preserves pullbacks; then FX:π’žX/β†’π’ŸF(X)/F_{X}\colon\mathcal{C}_{X/}\to\mathcal{D}_{F\left(X\right)/} also preserves pullbacks.

[05WV]

Proof. Consider the commutative square

π’žX/\textstyle{\mathcal{C}_{X/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ŸF(X)/\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{F\left(X\right)/}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ž\textstyle{\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’Ÿ.\textstyle{\mathcal{D}.}

The vertical functors and the bottom horizontal functor preserve pullbacks. The right vertical functor is conservative. It follows that the top horizontal functor preserves pullbacks as well. ∎

[0M2M]

Definition 2.1.4. Let F:π’žβ†’π’ŸF\colon\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D} be a functor between ∞\infty-categories. We say that an object YY is reduced if F⁑(Y)F\left(Y\right) is initial in π’Ÿ\mathcal{D}. We define π’žred\mathcal{C}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} to be the full subcategory of π’ž\mathcal{C} spanned by the reduced objects (FF will always be clear from the context when we employ this terminology).

[05WW]

Proposition 2.1.5. Let L:π’žβ‡†π’Ÿ:RL\colon\mathcal{C}\leftrightarrows\mathcal{D}\penalty\mskip 6.0mu plus 1.0mu\mathpunct{}\nonscript\mkern-3.0mu{:}\mskip 2.0muR be an adjunction between ∞\infty-categories. Assume that π’ž\mathcal{C} admits and LL preserves pullbacks, that π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} admits an initial object, and that RR is fully faithful. For every object Yβˆˆπ’žY\in\mathcal{C} we consider the following pullback diagram

Yred\textstyle{Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Y\textstyle{Y\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}R⁑(βˆ…π’Ÿ)\textstyle{R\left(\varnothing_{\mathcal{D}}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}R​L​(Y),\textstyle{RL\left(Y\right),}

where the right vertical map is the unit map of YY and the bottom horizontal map is the image under RR of the essentially unique map βˆ…π’Ÿβ†’L⁑(Y)\varnothing_{\mathcal{D}}\to L\left(Y\right). The top horizontal map ρ:Yredβ†’Y\rho\colon Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\to Y exhibits YredY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} as a co-localization of YY with respect to π’žred\mathcal{C}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} (dual to T.5.2.7.6).

[05WX]

Proof. First, we show that YredY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} is in fact reduced. Applying LL to the defining diagram of YredY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} and using the fact that LL preserves pullbacks, we see that the map L⁑(Yred)β†’L​R​(βˆ…)L\left(Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\to LR\left(\varnothing\right) is the pullback of the map L⁑(Y)β†’L​R​L​(Y)L\left(Y\right)\to LRL\left(Y\right), which is an equivalence (from the fact that the counit L​R​(Y)β†’YLR\left(Y\right)\to Y is an equivalence, the zig-zag identities and the 2-out-of-3 property). It follows that the map L⁑(Yred)β†’L​R​(βˆ…)L\left(Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\to LR\left(\varnothing\right) is an equivalence, but L​R​(βˆ…)β†’βˆ…LR\left(\varnothing\right)\to\varnothing is an equivalence as well (since RR is fully faithful) and we are done.

Now, we show that ρ\rho is a co-localization. Let ZZ be a reduced object. We have a homotopy pullback diagram of spaces

Map⁑(Z,Yred)\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁑(Z,Y)\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,Y\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁑(Z,R⁑(βˆ…))\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,R\left(\varnothing\right)\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁑(Z,R​L​(Y))\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,RL\left(Y\right)\right)}

and we note that the space of maps from a reduced object to any object in the essential image of RR is contractible. ∎

[05WY]

Corollary 2.1.6. In the setting of 2.1.5, the inclusion π’žredβ†ͺπ’ž\mathcal{C}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{C} admits a right adjoint and the co-localization map Yredβ†’YY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\to Y can be taken to be the counit of the adjunction at YY.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source Β· 1808.06006v3