Proof.We denote the -category
by . Let be the -component
of the unit of the adjunction . By T.2.1.2.1, the projections
and
are left fibrations. Moreover, since
is right anodyne, the map is an equivalence of -categories.
By T.2.2.3.3, we can choose an inverse
to that strictly commutes with the projections to .
We obtain a commutative diagram of simplicial sets
There is an induced map from the upper left corner to the pullback of the outer rectangle without the upper left corner, which is another commutative diagram of simplicial sets
Since left fibrations are closed under base change (T.2.1.2.1), the
vertical maps are left fibrations over . Hence, to show
that the top map is an equivalence it is enough to show that the induced
map on fibers is a homotopy equivalence (T.2.2.3.3). For every
we get a map
which is by construction obtained by applying the functor and
pre-composing with the unit . By the
universal property of the unit map this is a homotopy equivalence
for all and therefore the map
is an equivalence of -categories.
β
Proof.Let be the coCartesian fibration associated with the functor (which is also Cartesian, since has a right adjoint).
We can assume that we have a commutative diagram
such that ,
and
is a coCartesian edge of for every
(combine T.5.2.1.1 and T.5.2.1.3). It is clear from T.1.2.9.2 that
for any pair of -categories with objects
and there is a canonical isomorphism
Hence, we get an induced commutative diagram
The functor is a Cartesian and coCartesian fibration by the
duals of T.2.4.3.1(1) and T.2.4.3.2(1). Moreover, an edge in
is (co)Cartesian if and only if its projection to is
(co)Cartesian by the duals of T.2.4.3.1(2) and T.2.4.3.2(2), which
shows that the functor is associated with . It follows
that has a right adjoint .
Assuming that is fully faithful, we will show that is
fully faithful by showing that the counit of the adjunction
is an equivalence. For every object, the counit map is an edge of
. Since the projection
is conservative, it is enough to show that the counit map of
is mapped to the counit map of . Indeed, for an object
,
we choose a Cartesian edge and a coCartesian
edge , and combine
them into a commutative diagram of the form:
where and .
Since is coCartesian, there exists a lift
that gives an edge
that is isomorphic to the counit map of the adjunction
at in the homotopy category . We can similarly construct
the counit map for an object of . The assertion
now follows from the above characterization of (co)Cartesian edges
in .
β
The vertical functors and the bottom horizontal functor preserve pullbacks.
The right vertical functor is conservative. It follows that the top
horizontal functor preserves pullbacks as well.
β
Definition 2.1.4. Let be a
functor between -categories. We say that an object is reduced if is initial in . We define to be the full subcategory of spanned by the reduced objects ( will always be clear from the context when we employ this terminology).
Proposition 2.1.5.Let
be an adjunction between -categories. Assume that
admits and preserves pullbacks, that admits an initial object, and that is fully faithful. For every object we
consider the following pullback diagram
where the right vertical map is the unit map of and the bottom
horizontal map is the image under of the essentially unique map
. The top horizontal map
exhibits as a co-localization of with respect to
(dual to T.5.2.7.6).
Proof.First, we show that is in fact reduced. Applying to
the defining diagram of and using the fact that preserves
pullbacks, we see that the map
is the pullback of the map ,
which is an equivalence (from the fact that the counit is an equivalence, the zig-zag identities and the 2-out-of-3 property). It follows that the map is an equivalence,
but is an equivalence as well (since
is fully faithful) and we are done.
Now, we show that is a co-localization. Let be a reduced
object. We have a homotopy pullback diagram of spaces
and we note that the space of maps from a reduced object to any object
in the essential image of is contractible.
β
Corollary 2.1.6.In the setting of 2.1.5,
the inclusion admits a right
adjoint and the co-localization map can be taken to
be the counit of the adjunction at .