Definition 2.3.1. Let denote the skeletal version of the category of finite sets, ie the full subcategory of spanned by the objects for each integer . We define the -category of symmetric sequences (in spaces), denoted by , to be .
2.3 Symmetric Sequences[0M39]
There is another perspective on reduced -operads provided by the notion of a symmetric sequence. Roughly speaking, a symmetric sequence is a sequence of -spaces for , where is the symmetric group on elements. From an -operad with an object one can construct a symmetric sequence of spaces by
where the action of comes from permuting the inputs. For our purposes it is convenient to use the following model:
Remark 2.3.2. We note two things about this definition:
- 1.
The inclusion of the full subcategory spanned by Kan fibrations is an equivalence of -categories and the straightening functor of [Lur09] induces an equivalence of -categories . Since is equivalent to the disjoint union of classifying spaces of the symmetric groups , we get
More explicitly, given a symmetric sequence , taking pullback along the map that corresponds to the object , we obtain a space that is the underlying space of the -space on the right hand-side of the above equivalence.
- 2.
In relating -operads to symmetric sequences it is useful to note that the functor , which adds a base point, induces an isomorphism of groupoids . Moreover, is isomorphic to (see the notation in T.3.1.1.1).
We next define the underlying symmetric sequence of a pointed -operad , which is given by a map , such that is the image of (see 2.2.7).
Definition 2.3.3. Given a pointed -operad , we define its underlying symmetric sequence to be
and denote it by . By analogy with -operads, we denote by the source of .
Proof. Since is a pullback of the right fibration it is itself a right fibration. The simplicial set is isomorphic to and is in particular a Kan complex. By T.2.1.3.3 the map is a Kan fibration. ∎
2.3.3 relates to the informal description at the beginning of the subsection by
Proof. This follows directly from unwinding 2.3.3. ∎
Let be a pointed -operad and let be a map of -operads. Consider as pointed by the composition . Let and . The (1-categorical) functoriality of the formula in 2.3.4 induces a map of symmetric sequences
One can verify that this yields a functor on the level of homotopy categories
It will be important in what follows to know the following:
Proposition 2.3.6. The functor is conservative.
Proof. Let be a map of reduced -operads such that is an equivalence. The map is defined by a commutative triangle
To show that is an equivalence of -operads, we need to show that is an equivalence of -categories. Since and are reduced, it is clear that is essentially surjective. To show that is fully faithful, we can use the Segal conditions to reduce this to showing that the map
is a homotopy equivalence for all . By 2.3.5, those maps are induced by the equivalence and therefore are equivalences. ∎
Remark 2.3.7. It is possible to lift to a functor of -categories, but a bit tedious to do so. We shall be content with the above weaker version as it will suffice for our applications.
Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3
Original source · 1808.06006v3