ScalingStacks

0NXT

Proof. For ๐’ž1,๐’ž2โˆˆsโ€‹t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2}\in{st}, we define their tensor product by

๐’ž1โŠ—๐’ž2=(Indโก(๐’ž1)โŠ—Indโก(๐’ž2))c\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2}=(\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}_{1})\otimes\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}_{2}))^{c}

where the tensor product of the right hand side is calculated in the โˆž\infty-category ๐’ซโ€‹rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable โˆž\infty-categories (with morphisms left adjoints), and the superscript c denotes the full โˆž\infty-subcategory of compact objects of a presentable โˆž\infty-category. Since Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2} is idempotent complete and retracts of compact objects are compact, (Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2)c(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2})^{c} is idempotent complete as well. Thus the tensor product ๐’ž1โŠ—๐’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} is indeed an object of sโ€‹t{st}.

For ๐’ž1,๐’ž2,๐’Ÿโˆˆsโ€‹t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}\in{st}, let Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) be the full โˆž\infty-subcategory of functors ๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2โ†’๐’Ÿ\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2}\to\mathcal{D} that preserve finite colimits in ๐’ž1\mathcal{C}_{1} and ๐’ž2\mathcal{C}_{2} separately. We claim that For ๐’ž1,๐’ž2โˆˆsโ€‹t\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2}\in{st}, the tensor product ๐’ž1โŠ—๐’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} corepresents the functor Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,โˆ’)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},-) in the sense that for any ๐’Ÿโˆˆsโ€‹t\mathcal{D}\in{st}, there is a canonical equivalence

Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)โ‰ƒFunsโ€‹tโก(๐’ž1โŠ—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ).\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun_{{st}}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}).

As a consequence, the associativity and symmetry of the tensor product ๐’ž1โŠ—๐’ž2\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\mathcal{C}_{2} will immediately follow from the analogous properties of Funโ€ฒ\Fun^{\prime}.

For ๐’ž1,๐’ž2,๐’Ÿโˆˆ๐’ซโ€‹rL\mathcal{C}_{1},\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}, let FunLร—Lโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{L\times L}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) be the full โˆž\infty-subcategory of functors ๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2โ†’๐’Ÿ\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2}\to\mathcal{D} that preserve colimits in ๐’ž1\mathcal{C}_{1} and ๐’ž2\mathcal{C}_{2} separately. To prove the claim, observe that the inclusion ๐’Ÿโ†’Indโก๐’Ÿ\mathcal{D}\rightarrow\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D} induces a fully faithful functor

Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)โ†’Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,Indโก๐’Ÿ)โ‰ƒFunLร—Lโก(Indโก๐’ž1ร—Indโก๐’ž2,Indโก๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\rightarrow\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun^{L\times L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})

Its essential image consists of functors that preserve compact objects. By definition of the monoidal structure on the โˆž\infty-category ๐’ซโ€‹rL\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} of presentable โˆž\infty-categories, we have a further equivalence

FunLร—Lโก(Indโก๐’ž1ร—Indโก๐’ž2,Indโก๐’Ÿ)โ‰ƒFunLโก(Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2,Indโก๐’Ÿ).\Fun^{L\times L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun^{\rm L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D}).

Since the compact objects of Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2} are generated by finite colimits of external products of compacts objects, we obtain an equivalence between Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D}) and the full โˆž\infty-subcategory of FunLโก(Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2,Indโก๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{\rm L}(\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2},\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{D}) consisting of functors that preserve compact objects. In other words, we have the asserted equivalence that characterizes the tensor product

Funโ€ฒโก(๐’ž1ร—๐’ž2,๐’Ÿ)โ‰ƒFunsโ€‹tโก((Indโก๐’ž1โŠ—Indโก๐’ž2)c,๐’Ÿ).\Fun^{\prime}(\mathcal{C}_{1}\times\mathcal{C}_{2},\mathcal{D})\simeq\Fun_{{st}}((\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{1}\otimes\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{C}_{2})^{c},\mathcal{D}).

Finally, the assertion that the functor Ind:sโ€‹tโ†’๐’ซโ€‹rL\operatorname{Ind}:{st}\to\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L} is symmetric monoidal is immediate from the constructions and the natural equivalence Indโก(๐’žc)โ‰ƒ๐’ž\operatorname{Ind}(\mathcal{C}^{c})\simeq\mathcal{C}, for ๐’žโˆˆ๐’ซโ€‹rL\mathcal{C}\in\mathcal{P}r^{\rm L}. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5