ScalingStacks

0NW6

Remark 1.10. One can find a precursor to the above in the work of MΓΌger [M] and Ostrik [Os].

Given a semisimple abelian monoidal category π’ž\mathcal{C} and a module category MM, consider the monoidal category π’žMβˆ—\mathcal{C}_{M}^{*} consisting of π’ž\mathcal{C}-linear endofunctors of MM. Then independently of MM, there is a canonical identification of the Drinfeld centers of π’žMβˆ—\mathcal{C}_{M}^{*} and π’ž.\mathcal{C}.

A motivating example is when HβŠ‚GH\subset G are finite groups, and one takes π’ž=Rep⁑(G)\mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) and M=Rep⁑(H)M=\operatorname{Rep}(H), so that π’žMβˆ—β‰ƒVect⁑(H\G/H)\mathcal{C}^{*}_{M}\simeq\operatorname{Vect}(H\backslash G/H). Then independently of HH, the center of Vect⁑(H\G/H)\operatorname{Vect}(H\backslash G/H) is the category of adjoint equivariant vector bundles on GG.

The above theorem extends this picture from finite groups to algebraic groups.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5