ScalingStacks

0NYT

Proof. We define 𝒡X\mathcal{Z}_{X} on objects by assigning 𝒡X​(m)=QC⁑((ℒ​X)m)\mathcal{Z}_{X}(m)=\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{m}).

To define 𝒡X\mathcal{Z}_{X} on morphisms, observe first that since XX is perfect, (ℒ​X)m(\mathcal{L}X)^{m} is perfect, and for Σ∈2​Cobβˆ˜β€‹(m,n)\Sigma\in 2{\rm Cob}^{\circ}(m,n), the mapping stack XΞ£=Map⁑(Ξ£,X)X^{\Sigma}=\Map(\Sigma,X) is also perfect (special cases of CorollaryΒ 3.25). Now for each Σ∈2​Cobβˆ˜β€‹(m,n)\Sigma\in 2{\rm Cob}^{\circ}(m,n), consider the correspondence

XΞ£\textstyle{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces X^{\Sigma}}(ℒ​X)m\textstyle{(\mathcal{L}X)^{m}}(ℒ​X)n\textstyle{(\mathcal{L}X)^{n}}

Since all of the stacks involved are perfect, pullback and pushforward of quasi-coherent sheaves along this correspondence defines a colimit-preserving functor

𝒡X​(Ξ£):QC⁑((ℒ​X)m)β†’QC⁑((ℒ​X)n).\mathcal{Z}_{X}(\Sigma):\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{m})\to\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{n}).

Thus applying this construction in families, we obtain a map of spaces

𝒡X​(m,n):2​Cobβˆ˜β€‹(m,n)β†’Fun⁑(QC⁑((ℒ​X)m),QC⁑((ℒ​X)n)).\mathcal{Z}_{X}(m,n):2{\rm Cob}^{\circ}(m,n)\to\Fun(\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{m}),\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{n})).

Suppose now that Ξ£=Ξ£1β€‹βˆβˆkS1Ξ£2∈2​Cob​(m,n)\Sigma=\Sigma_{1}\coprod_{\coprod_{k}{S^{1}}}\Sigma_{2}\in 2{\rm Cob}(m,n) is obtained by sewing two surfaces Ξ£1∈2​Cob​(m,k)\Sigma_{1}\in 2{\rm Cob}(m,k) and Ξ£2∈2​Cob​(k,n)\Sigma_{2}\in 2{\rm Cob}(k,n). Then we have a diagram of correspondences

XΞ£\textstyle{X^{\Sigma}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}XΞ£1\textstyle{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces X^{\Sigma_{1}}}XΞ£2\textstyle{X^{\Sigma_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(ℒ​X)m\textstyle{(\mathcal{L}X)^{m}}(ℒ​X)k\textstyle{(\mathcal{L}X)^{k}}(ℒ​X)n\textstyle{(\mathcal{L}X)^{n}}

Since all of the stacks involved are perfect, base change provides a canonical equivalence of functors

𝒡X​(Ξ£)≃𝒡X​(Ξ£2)βˆ˜π’΅X​(Ξ£1):QC⁑((ℒ​X)m)β†’QC⁑((ℒ​X)n).\mathcal{Z}_{X}(\Sigma)\simeq\mathcal{Z}_{X}(\Sigma_{2})\circ\mathcal{Z}_{X}(\Sigma_{1}):\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{m})\to\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{n}).

Similar diagrams define the higher compositions.

To complete the construction, note that 𝒡X\mathcal{Z}_{X} comes equipped with a canonical symmetric monoidal structure. Namely, by TheoremΒ 4.7, there is a canonical equivalence

𝒡X​(m)=QC⁑((ℒ​X)m)≃QC⁑(ℒ​X)βŠ—m=𝒡X​(1)βŠ—m,\mathcal{Z}_{X}(m)=\qc((\mathcal{L}X)^{m})\simeq\qc(\mathcal{L}X)^{\otimes m}=\mathcal{Z}_{X}(1)^{\otimes m},

and it clearly extends to a symmetric monoidal structure. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5