ScalingStacks

0NY4

Remark 4.11. The equivalence of Corollary 4.10 is naturally monoidal in the following sense. For perfect stacks X,X′,X′′X,X^{\prime},X^{\prime\prime} mapping to a perfect stack YY, there is a convolution map

QC⁡(X×YX′)⊗QC⁡(X′×YX′′)→QC⁡(X×YX′′)\qc(X\times_{Y}X^{\prime})\otimes\qc(X^{\prime}\times_{Y}X^{\prime\prime})\to\qc(X\times_{Y}X^{\prime\prime})

given by pulling back and pushing forward with respect to the triple product X×YX′×YX′′X\times_{Y}X^{\prime}\times_{Y}X^{\prime\prime} (see Section 5.2). On the other hand, we have a composition map

FunY⁡(QC⁡(X),QC⁡(X′))⊗FunY⁡(QC⁡(X′),QC⁡(X′′))→FunY⁡(QC⁡(X),QC⁡(X′′)),\Fun_{Y}(\qc(X),\qc(X^{\prime}))\otimes\Fun_{Y}(\qc(X^{\prime}),\qc(X^{\prime\prime}))\to\Fun_{Y}(\qc(X),\qc(X^{\prime\prime})),

and the equivalence of the theorem intertwines these composition maps.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5