ScalingStacks

0NXP

Lemma 4.3. Let โ„ณ\mathcal{M} be a stable presentable โˆž\infty-category which is left tensored and cotensored over ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, and let AA be an associative algebra in ๐’ž\mathcal{C}. Then the forgetful functor G:ModAโ€‹(๐’ž)โŠ—๐’žโ„ณโ†’โ„ณG:\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{M}\to\mathcal{M} is conservative.

0NXQ

Proof. Observe that for any ๐’Ÿ\mathcal{D} tensored over ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, the pullback

Fun๐’žLโก(ModAโ€‹(๐’ž)โŠ—๐’žโ„ณ,๐’Ÿ)โ†’Fun๐’žLโก(โ„ณ,๐’Ÿ)\Fun^{\rm L}_{\mathcal{C}}(\mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{M},\mathcal{D})\rightarrow\Fun^{\rm L}_{\mathcal{C}}(\mathcal{M},\mathcal{D})

induced by the induction F:โ„ณโ†’ModAโŠ—๐’žโ„ณF:\mathcal{M}\to\mathrm{Mod}_{A}\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{M} is conservative. In other words, if a functor out of ModAร—โ„ณ\mathrm{Mod}_{A}\times\mathcal{M} (which preserves colimits in each variable) is trivial when restricted to โ„ณ\mathcal{M}, then it is necessarily trivial.

Consequently, switching to opposite categories, we have that the corresponding functor

Fun๐’žRโก(๐’Ÿ,ModAโŠ—โ„ณ)โ†’Fun๐’žRโก(๐’Ÿ,โ„ณ)\Fun^{\rm R}_{\mathcal{C}}(\mathcal{D},\mathrm{Mod}_{A}\otimes\mathcal{M})\rightarrow\Fun^{\rm R}_{\mathcal{C}}(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{M})

induced by the forgetful functor G:ModAโŠ—๐’žโ„ณโ†’โ„ณG:\mathrm{Mod}_{A}\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\mathcal{M}\to\mathcal{M} is conservative.

Now we can apply Lemma 4.2 with โ„ณโ€ฒ=ModAโŠ—โ„ณ\mathcal{M}^{\prime}=\mathrm{Mod}_{A}\otimes\mathcal{M} to obtain that GG is conservative. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ben-Zvi, John Francis, David Nadler

Original source: arXiv:0805.0157v5