ScalingStacks

0N5A

Proof. The following equivalences

∫Mπ–₯𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇(𝖡)β‰ƒπ–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚βˆπ—‚β‰₯πŸ’π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi(U,βˆ‚U)βŠ—Ξ£iVβŠ—iβ‰ƒβˆiβ‰₯0π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi(U,βˆ‚U)βŠ—Ξ£iVβŠ—i\int_{M}\free_{n}(V)\simeq\colim_{U\in\disk^{\partial}_{n/M}}\coprod_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(U,\partial U)\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}\simeq\coprod_{i\geq 0}\colim_{U\in\disk^{\partial}_{n/M}}\conf_{i}(U,\partial U)\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}

follow from the commutativity of colimits. To conclude the result it therefore suffices to show that for each ii the canonical morphism

π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi​(U,βˆ‚U)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£i​VβŠ—iβŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M,βˆ‚M)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£i​VβŠ—i\colim_{U\in\disk^{\partial}_{n/M}}\conf_{i}(U,\partial U)\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M,\partial M)\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}

in 𝒱\mathcal{V} is an equivalence. By the assumed distributivity in the βŠ—\otimes-presentability condition, this follows if the natural Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map of Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-spaces

(9) π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi​(U,βˆ‚U)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M,βˆ‚M)\colim_{U\in\disk^{\partial}_{n/M}}\conf_{i}(U,\partial U)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M,\partial M)

is an equivalence, which we now show.

We first consider the case that the boundary of MM is empty, so that the natural Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)β†’β‰…π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M,βˆ‚M)\conf_{i}(M)\xrightarrow{\cong}\conf_{i}(M,\partial M) is a homeomorphism, and the natural functor π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬β†’β‰ƒπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚\disk_{n/M}\xrightarrow{\simeq}\disk^{\partial}_{n/M} is an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. In this case we are to show that the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map of Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-spaces

π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi​(U)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\colim_{U\in\disk_{n/M}}\conf_{i}(U)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is an equivalence. After PropositionΒ 2.19, it is enough to show that the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map of Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-topological spaces

(10) π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†Uβˆˆπ–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/Mβ€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(U)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\underset{U\in{\sf Disk}_{n/M}}{\colim}\conf_{i}(U)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is a weak homotopy equivalence from the homotopy colimit. Each map π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(U)β†’π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(U)\to\conf_{i}(M) comprising this homotopy colimit is an open embedding. Also, for each element {1,…,i}→𝑐M\{1,\dots,i\}\xrightarrow{c}M of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M), choosing mutually disjoint Euclidean neighborhoods about each c⁑(j)∈Mc(j)\in M demonstrates that cc lies in the image of at least one such open embedding. Therefore this augmented diagram is an open cover of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M). This open cover of MM has the property that each finite intersection of its terms is covered by terms contained in this finite intersection. This is to say that this open cover of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M) is in fact a hypercover. That the mapΒ (10) is a weak homotopy equivalence follows from Corollary 1.6 ofΒ [DI].

Now suppose βˆ‚M\partial M is not empty. Fix a collar-neighborhood βˆ‚M×ℝβ‰₯0β†ͺM\partial M\times\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}\hookrightarrow M. Such a collar-neighborhood determines the top horizontal arrow in the diagram of topological spaces

π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†βˆ…β‰ IβŠ‚{1,…,i}β€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώ{1,…,i}βˆ–I⁑(βˆ‚M)Γ—π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–ΏI⁑(M̊)\textstyle{\underset{\emptyset\neq I\subset\{1,\dots,i\}}{\colim}\conf_{\{1,\dots,i\}\smallsetminus I}(\partial M)\times\conf_{I}(\mathring{M})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M̊)\textstyle{\conf_{i}(\mathring{M})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}βˆ—\textstyle{\ast\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M,βˆ‚M)\textstyle{\conf_{i}(M,\partial M)}

which commutes up to homotopy – here, the homotopy colimit is indexed by the opposite of the poset of non-empty subsets of {1,…,i}\{1,\dots,i\}. This collar-neighborhood also gives that this diagram is a weak homotopy pushout. The result for this case of non-empty boundary thus follows from the previous case of empty boundary applied to βˆ‚M\partial M and to M̊\mathring{M}, using that homotopy colimits commute with one another.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6