follow from the commutativity of colimits.
To conclude the result it therefore suffices to show that for each the canonical morphism
in is an equivalence.
By the assumed distributivity in the -presentability condition, this follows if the natural -equivariant map of -spaces
(9)
is an equivalence, which we now show.
We first consider the case that the boundary of is empty, so that the natural -equivariant map is a homeomorphism, and the natural functor is an equivalence of -categories.
In this case we are to show that the -equivariant map of -spaces
is an equivalence.
After PropositionΒ 2.19, it is enough to show that the -equivariant map of -topological spaces
(10)
is a weak homotopy equivalence from the homotopy colimit.
Each map comprising this homotopy colimit is an open embedding.
Also, for each
element of , choosing mutually disjoint Euclidean neighborhoods about each demonstrates that lies in the image of at least one such open embedding.
Therefore this augmented diagram is an open cover of .
This open cover of has the property that each finite intersection of its terms is covered by terms contained in this finite intersection.
This is to say that this open cover of is in fact a hypercover.
That the mapΒ (10) is a weak homotopy equivalence follows from Corollary 1.6 ofΒ [DI].
Now suppose is not empty.
Fix a collar-neighborhood .
Such a collar-neighborhood determines the top horizontal arrow in the diagram of topological spaces
which commutes up to homotopy β here, the homotopy colimit is indexed by the opposite of the poset of non-empty subsets of .
This collar-neighborhood also gives that this diagram is a weak homotopy pushout.
The result for this case of non-empty boundary thus follows from the previous case of empty boundary applied to and to , using that homotopy colimits commute with one another.