ScalingStacks

0N3I

Proposition 2.19. The functor π–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/MBβŸΆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑\ddisk^{B}_{n/M}\longrightarrow\disk^{B}_{n/M} witness a localization of ∞\infty-categories:

(π–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/MB)​[ℐMβˆ’1]β‰ƒπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑.\bigl(\ddisk^{B}_{n/M}\bigr)[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]~\simeq~\disk^{B}_{n/M}~.
0N3J

Proof. Manifestly, the functor is essentially surjective, and it carries the ∞\infty-subcategory ℐM\mathcal{I}_{M} to the maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid (π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑)∼\bigl(\disk^{B}_{n/M}\bigr)^{\sim}. There results a functor (π–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/MB)​[ℐMβˆ’1]β†’π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑\bigl(\ddisk^{B}_{n/M}\bigr)[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\to\disk^{B}_{n/M} from the localization. We will argue that this functor is an equivalence by showing it is an equivalence on maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoids, then that it is an equivalence on spaces of morphisms. After LemmaΒ 2.5, it is enough to consider the case of B=π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)B=\BTop(n). We will adopt the following notation for this proof:

𝖣M:=π–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/MΒ andΒ π’ŸM:=π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬.\mathsf{D}_{M}~:=~\ddisk_{n/M}\qquad\text{ and }\qquad\mathcal{D}_{M}~:=~\disk_{n/M}~.

The maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of 𝖣M\mathsf{D}_{M} is the classifying space 𝖑​ℐM\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}_{M}. In light of the coproduct expression in LemmaΒ 2.12, fix a cardinality iβ‰₯0i\geq 0. Consider the full subcategory ℐMiβŠ‚β„M\mathcal{I}_{M}^{i}\subset\mathcal{I}_{M} consisting of those (Uβ†ͺM)(U\hookrightarrow M) for which the cardinality of the connected components |[U]|=i|[U]|=i. We thus seek to show that the resulting functor ℐMiβ†’π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)Ξ£i\mathcal{I}_{M}^{i}\to\conf_{i}(M)_{\Sigma_{i}} witnesses an equivalence from the classifying space. We explain the following sequence of weak homotopy equivalences

𝖑​ℐMi\displaystyle\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}^{i}_{M} ≃\displaystyle\simeq π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†(Uβ†ͺM)βˆˆβ„Mi​(ℝ𝗇)𝗂\displaystyle\underset{(U\hookrightarrow M)\in\mathcal{I}^{i}_{M}}{\colim}~(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{i}
→≃\displaystyle\xrightarrow{\simeq} 𝗉.π—Œ.π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†(Uβ†ͺM)βˆˆβ„Mi​(ℝ𝗇)𝗂\displaystyle\underset{(U\hookrightarrow M)\in\mathcal{I}^{i}_{M}}{\sf p.s.colim}~(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{i}
β†’β‰…\displaystyle\xrightarrow{\cong} π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)Ξ£i\displaystyle\conf_{i}(M)_{\Sigma_{i}}

where 𝗉.π—Œ.π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†{\sf p.s.colim} denotes the ordinary point-set colimit of topological spaces. The first equivalence is formal, because each term in the homotopy colimit is contractible. By inspection, the category ℐMi\mathcal{I}_{M}^{i} forms a basis for the standard Grothendieck topology on π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)Ξ£i\conf_{i}(M)_{\Sigma_{i}}. The third homeomorphism follows. Because π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)Ξ£i\conf_{i}(M)_{\Sigma_{i}} is paracompact, CorollaryΒ 1.6 ofΒ [DI] gives that the second map is a weak homotopy equivalence. In summary, we have verified that the map of maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoids

(𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])βˆΌβ†’β‰ƒ(π’ŸM)∼\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{\sim}\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}\bigl(\mathcal{D}_{M}\bigr)^{\sim}

is an equivalence.

We now show that the functor from the localization induces an equivalence on spaces of morphisms. Consider the diagram of spaces

(𝖣U​[ℐUβˆ’1])∼\textstyle{\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{U}[\mathcal{I}_{U}^{-1}]\bigr)^{\sim}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Uβ†ͺM)\scriptstyle{(U\hookrightarrow M)}π’ŸU∼\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{U}^{\sim}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Uβ†ͺM)\scriptstyle{(U\hookrightarrow M)}(𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])(1)\textstyle{\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{(1)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝖾𝗏1\scriptstyle{{\sf ev}_{1}}π’ŸM(1)\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{M}^{(1)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝖾𝗏1\scriptstyle{{\sf ev}_{1}}(𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])∼\textstyle{\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{\sim}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’ŸM∼\textstyle{\mathcal{D}_{M}^{\sim}}

where a superscript (1) indicates a space of morphisms, and the upper vertical arrows are given as (Vβ†ͺU)↦((Vβ†ͺM)β†ͺ(Uβ†ͺM))(V\hookrightarrow U)\mapsto\bigl((V\hookrightarrow M)\hookrightarrow(U\hookrightarrow M)\bigr). Our goal is to show that the middle horizontal arrow is an equivalence. We will accomplish this by showing that the diagram is a map of homotopy fiber sequences, for we have already shown that the top and bottom horizontal maps are equivalences.

The right vertical sequence is a fiber sequence is because such evaluation maps are coCartesian fibrations, in general. Then, by inspection, the fiber over (Uβ†ͺM)(U\hookrightarrow M) is the maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of the over ∞\infty-category (π’ŸM)/(Uβ†ͺM)(\mathcal{D}_{M})_{/(U\hookrightarrow M)}. This over ∞\infty-category is canonically identified as π’ŸU\mathcal{D}_{U}.

We now show that the left vertical sequence is a homotopy fiber sequence. The space of morphisms (𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])(1)\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{(1)} is the classifying space of the subcategory of the functor category π–₯π—Žπ—‡β„π–¬β‘([𝟣],𝖣𝖬)βŠ‚π–₯π—Žπ—‡β‘([𝟣],𝖣𝖬)\Fun^{\mathcal{I}_{M}}\bigl([1],\mathsf{D}_{M}\bigr)\subset\Fun\bigl([1],\mathsf{D}_{M}\bigr) consisting of the same objects but only those natural transformations by ℐ\mathcal{I}. We claim the fiber over (Uβ†ͺM)(U\hookrightarrow M) of the evaluation map is canonically identified as in the sequence

(𝖣U​[ℐUβˆ’1])βˆΌβ†’(Uβ†ͺM)(𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])(1)→𝖾𝗏1(𝖣M​[ℐMβˆ’1])∼.\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{U}[\mathcal{I}_{U}^{-1}]\bigr)^{\sim}\xrightarrow{~(U\hookrightarrow M)~}\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{(1)}\xrightarrow{~{\sf ev}_{1}~}\bigl(\mathsf{D}_{M}[\mathcal{I}_{M}^{-1}]\bigr)^{\sim}~.

This claim is justified through Quillen’s Theorem B, for the named fiber is the classifying space of the over ∞\infty-category (ℐM)/(Uβ†ͺM)(\mathcal{I}_{M})_{/(U\hookrightarrow M)} which is canonically isomorphic to ℐU\mathcal{I}_{U}. To apply Quillen’s Theorem B we must show that each morphism (Uβ†ͺM)β†ͺ(Vβ†ͺM)(U\hookrightarrow M)\hookrightarrow(V\hookrightarrow M) in ℐ\mathcal{I} induces an equivalence of spaces 𝖑⁑((ℐM)/(Uβ†ͺM))≃𝖑⁑((ℐM)/(Vβ†ͺM))\mathsf{B}\bigl((\mathcal{I}_{M})_{/(U\hookrightarrow M)}\bigr)\simeq\mathsf{B}\bigl((\mathcal{I}_{M})_{/(V\hookrightarrow M)}\bigr). This map of spaces is canonically identified as the map 𝖑​ℐU→𝖑​ℐV\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}_{U}\to\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}_{V} induced from the inclusion Uβ†ͺVU\hookrightarrow V, which, by design, is a bijection on connected components. Through the previous analysis of this proof, this map is further identified as the map of spaces Uβ†ͺVU\hookrightarrow V. The Kister–Mazur TheoremΒ 2.3 implies this inclusion Uβ†ͺVU\hookrightarrow V is isotopic to an isomorphism, from which it follows that the map of spaces 𝖑​ℐU→≃𝖑​ℐV\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}_{U}\xrightarrow{\simeq}\mathsf{B}\mathcal{I}_{V} is an equivalence. We conclude that Quillen’s Theorem B applies. (For an ∞\infty-categorical account of Quillen’s Theorem B, see for instance TheoremΒ 5.3 ofΒ [Bar].) ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6