ScalingStacks

5.1. Factorization homology with coefficients in commutative algebras

We begin by examining commutative algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V}, otherwise known as β„°βˆž\mathcal{E}_{\infty}-algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V}. Note first that a commutative algebra in 𝒱\mathcal{V} is equivalent to a symmetric monoidal functor π–₯𝗂𝗇→𝒱{\sf Fin}\rightarrow\mathcal{V} from finite sets with disjoint union. So restriction along the connected components functor [βˆ’]:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β†’π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡β†’[βˆ’]π–₯𝗂𝗇[-]:\disk^{B}_{n}\rightarrow\disk_{n}\xrightarrow{[-]}{\sf Fin} defines a forgetful functor

𝖿𝗀𝗍:π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)βŸΆπ– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β‘(𝒱).{\sf fgt}\colon\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\longrightarrow\Alg_{\disk^{B}_{n}}(\mathcal{V})~.

We have the following consequence of βŠ—\otimes-excision, where 𝒱\mathcal{V} is a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable. To phrase this result we utilize that the ∞\infty-category π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V}) is tensored over spaces:

π–²π—‰π–Ίπ–Όπ–Ύπ—ŒΓ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†(𝒱)β†’βŠ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†(𝒱),(X,A)β†¦π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†(π–·β†’βˆ—β†’{𝖠}π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†(𝒱)).\spaces\times\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\xrightarrow{\otimes}\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})~,\qquad(X,A)\mapsto\colim\bigl(X\to\ast\xrightarrow{\{A\}}\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\bigr)~.
0N53

Proposition 5.1. The following diagram among ∞\infty-categories commutes:

ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nBΓ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\mfld^{B}_{n}\times\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}U×𝗂𝖽\scriptstyle{U\times{\sf id}}𝗂𝖽×fgt\scriptstyle{{\sf id}\times{\rm fgt}}π–²π—‰π–Ίπ–Όπ–Ύπ—ŒΓ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\Space\times\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}βŠ—\scriptstyle{\otimes}π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nBΓ—π– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\mfld^{B}_{n}\times\Alg_{\disk^{B}_{n}}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∫\scriptstyle{\int}𝒱\textstyle{\mathcal{V}}

where UU is the underlying space functor and the right downward arrow is the standard forgetful functor. In particular, there is a natural equivalence

∫MA≃MβŠ—A\int_{M}A~\simeq~M\otimes A

between the factorization homology of MM with coefficients in AA and the tensor of the commutative algebra AA with the underlying space of MM.

0N54

Proof. The functor βˆ’βŠ—A:ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝒱-\otimes A\colon\mfld_{n}^{B}\to\mathcal{V} carries each contractible manifold to the underlying object of the commutative algebra AA. For (Ai)i∈I(A_{i})_{i\in I} a finite sequence of commutative algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V}, the II-fold coproduct in π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V}) is the pointwise tensor product ⨂i∈I​Ai\underset{i\in I}{\bigotimes}A_{i} (see PropositionΒ 3.2.4.7 ofΒ [Lu2]). It follows that this functor βˆ’βŠ—A-\otimes A is symmetric monoidal. From the defining expression of factorization homology as a colimit, there results a natural transformation

βˆ«βˆ’AβŸΆβˆ’βŠ—A\int_{-}A\longrightarrow-\otimes A

between symmetric monoidal functors ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝒱\mfld_{n}^{B}\to\mathcal{V}, which evaluates as an equivalence on objects of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘\disk_{n}^{B}. LemmaΒ 3.18 grants that the domain of this natural transformation satisfies βŠ—\otimes-excision. Because a collar-gluing M′​⋃M0×ℝ​Mβ€²β€²β‰…MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M determines a pushout of underlying spaces Mβ€²β€‹βˆM0​M′′≃MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}}{\coprod}M^{\prime\prime}\simeq M, the codomain of this natural transformation too satisfies βŠ—\otimes-excision. That the natural transformation evaluates on each BB-framed nn-manifold MM as an equivalence then follows by induction on a handle decomposition on MM.

∎

In other words, the factorization homology ∫MA\int_{M}A has a natural structure of a commutative algebra when AA is commutative, and this commutative algebra has a universal property: for each commutative algebra CC in 𝒱\mathcal{V} there is a natural equivalence from the space of commutative algebra maps

π–¬π–Ίπ—‰π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(βˆ«π–¬π– ,𝖒)β‰ƒπ–¬π–Ίπ—‰π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝖠,𝖒)𝖬,\Map_{\com}\bigl(\int_{M}A,C\bigr)~\simeq~\Map_{\com}(A,C)^{M}~,

to the space of maps from MM to the space of commutative algebra maps. By formal properties of left adjoints and tensors, this has the immediate corollary.

0N55

Corollary 5.2. For each symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category 𝒱\mathcal{V} which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable, there is a natural equivalence in 𝒱\mathcal{V}:

∫M𝖲𝗒𝗆⁑(𝖡)≃𝖲𝗒𝗆⁑(π–¬βŠ—π–΅).\int_{M}\sym(V)~\simeq~\sym(M\otimes V)~.

In particular, if 𝒱\mathcal{V} is the ∞\infty-category of chain complexes with tensor product, then there is an equivalence ∫M𝖲𝗒𝗆⁑(𝖡)≃𝖲𝗒𝗆⁑(π–’βˆ—β€‹(𝖬,𝖡))\int_{M}\sym(V)\simeq\sym(\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(M,V)) for each chain complex VV. We now push the above result slightly further for the two special classes of commutative algebras arising from the cohomology of spaces and the cohomology of Lie algebras. The study of the latter has benefitted greatly from conversations with Kevin Costello and Dennis Gaitsgory, and a full development of these ideas will amount to a forthcoming work.

0N56

Proposition 5.3. Let MM be an nn-manifold, and let XX be a nilpotent nn-connective space of finite type over RR such that Ο€n​X\pi_{n}X is finite. There is a natural equivalence of chain complexes

∫Mπ–’βˆ—β€‹(X,R)β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—β€‹(XM,R)\int_{M}\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X,R)~\simeq~\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{M},R)

between the factorization homology of MM with coefficient in the RR-cohomology of XX and the RR-cohomology of the space of maps from MM to XX.

0N57

Proof. The two sides are evidently equivalent in the case where MM is homeomorphic to ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}, so to establish the result it suffices, as usual, to check by induction over a handle decomposition of MM. Given a handle decomposition N​⋃Sk×ℝnβˆ’k​ℝnβ‰…MN\underset{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}}{\bigcup}\mathbb{R}^{n}\cong M, we have a homotopy pullback diagram of spaces

(8) XM\textstyle{X^{M}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Xℝn\textstyle{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}}}XN\textstyle{X^{N}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}XSk×ℝnβˆ’k\textstyle{X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}}}

which gives rise to a natural map in RR-homology

π–’βˆ—β€‹(XM,R)βŸΆπ–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)β€‹β¨‚π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)β€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R)\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{M},R)\longrightarrow\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{N},R)\underset{\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R)}{\bigotimes}\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R)

from the homology of the mapping spaces to the cotensor product of the comodules π–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{N},R) and π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R)\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R) over the coalgebra π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R). This map is an equivalence exactly if the homological Eilenberg–Moore, or Rothenberg–Steenrod, spectral sequence for this homotopy Cartesian diagram converges. By Dwyer [Dw], the convergence of this Eilenberg–Moore spectral sequence is assured if the base XSk×ℝnβˆ’kX^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}} is connected and the action

Ο€1​(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,f)β†»Ο€βˆ—β€‹(𝖿𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋f​(Xℝnβ†’XSk×ℝnβˆ’k))\pi_{1}\bigl(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},f\bigr)\circlearrowright\pi_{\ast}\bigl({\sf fiber}_{f}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rightarrow X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}})\bigr)

is nilpotent for a choice of basepoint f∈XSk×ℝnβˆ’kf\in X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}}. Since XX is nn-connective, for k<nk<n any map f:Skβ†’Xf:S^{k}\rightarrow X is nullhomotopic, and therefore the base XSk×ℝnβˆ’k≃XSkX^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}}\simeq X^{S^{k}} is connected. We can thus take ff to be the constant map valued at the basepoint of XX, and so identify 𝖿𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋f​(Xℝnβ†’XSk×ℝnβˆ’k)≃Ωk+1​X{\sf fiber}_{f}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rightarrow X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}})\simeq\Omega^{k+1}X. We now show the action of Ο€1​(XSk)\pi_{1}\bigl(X^{S^{k}}\bigr) on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X is nilpotent. Consider the fiber sequence Ξ©k+1​Xβ†’XSkβ†’π–Ύπ—βˆ—X\Omega^{k+1}X\to X^{S^{k}}\xrightarrow{{\sf ev}_{\ast}}X. This fibration admits a section, given by the constant maps. Consequently, there is an identification as a semi-direct product:

Ο€1​(XSk)β‰…Ο€1​X⋉π1​Ωk​Xβ‰…Ο€1​X⋉π0​Ωk+1​X.\pi_{1}\bigl(X^{S^{k}}\bigr)\cong\pi_{1}X\ltimes\pi_{1}\Omega^{k}X\cong\pi_{1}X\ltimes\pi_{0}\Omega^{k+1}X~.

Through this identification, the action of Ο€1​(XSk)\pi_{1}\bigl(X^{S^{k}}\bigr) on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X is the unique action that extends the standard actions of Ο€1​X\pi_{1}X and of Ο€0​Ωk+1​X\pi_{0}\Omega^{k+1}X on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X. By assumption, the action of Ο€1​X\pi_{1}X on Ο€βˆ—+k+1​Xβ‰…Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast+k+1}X\cong\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X is nilpotent. In the case that k=0k=0, the same assumption grants that the action of Ο€0​Ωk+1​X\pi_{0}\Omega^{k+1}X on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X is nilpotent. In the case that k>0k>0, the action of Ο€0​Ωk+1​X\pi_{0}\Omega^{k+1}X on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X is automatically nilpotent due to commutativity. Nilpotence of the action of Ο€1​(XSk)\pi_{1}\bigl(X^{S^{k}}\bigr) on Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ξ©k+1​X\pi_{\ast}\Omega^{k+1}X follows. Consequently, the natural map in RR-homology above is an equivalence.

The remainder of this argument is checking that we have imposed sufficient finiteness conditions to ensure the convergence in cohomology as well as homology. Dualizing, we obtain an equivalence

(π–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)β€‹β¨‚π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)β€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R))βˆ¨β€‹βŸΆβˆΌβ€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(XM,R).\Bigl(\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{N},R)\underset{\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R)}{\bigotimes}\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R)\Bigr)^{\vee}\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{M},R)~.

Since Ο€n​X\pi_{n}X is finite, the mapping space XKX^{K} has finitely many components for any nn-dimensional finite CW complex KK. Because the source spaces, MM, NN, Sk×ℝnβˆ’kS^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}, and ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}, all have have the homotopy types of finite nn-dimensional CW complexes, we obtain that all these mapping spaces have finitely many components. Since they are additionally finite CW complexes and XX is finite type, the homology groups of the mapping spaces 𝖧i​(XK,R)\mathsf{H}_{i}(X^{K},R) are finite rank over RR, and therefore π–’βˆ—β€‹(XK,R)\mathsf{C}_{*}(X^{K},R) is its own double dual: the map π–’βˆ—β€‹(XK,R)β†’π–’βˆ—β€‹(XK,R)∨\mathsf{C}_{*}(X^{K},R)\rightarrow\mathsf{C}^{*}(X^{K},R)^{\vee} is an equivalence. Likewise, there is an equivalence between the dual of the tensor product and the cotensor product

(π–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)β€‹β¨‚π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)β€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R))βˆ¨β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)β€‹β¨‚π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)β€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R)β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—β€‹(XM,R)\Bigl(\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{N},R)\underset{\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R)}{\bigotimes}\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R)\Bigr)^{\vee}\simeq\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{N},R)\underset{\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R)}{\bigotimes}\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R)\simeq\mathsf{C}_{\ast}(X^{M},R)

– this can be seen by commuting duality with the colimit to obtain a limit of a cosimplicial object, then comparing termwise. Continuing, one then concludes the equivalence

π–’βˆ—β€‹(XM,R)β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—β€‹(XN,R)β€‹β¨‚π–’βˆ—β€‹(XSk×ℝnβˆ’k,R)β€‹π–’βˆ—β€‹(Xℝn,R),\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{M},R)\simeq\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{N},R)\underset{\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{S^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}},R)}{\bigotimes}\mathsf{C}^{\ast}(X^{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R)~,

thereby finishing the proof.

∎

0N58

Remark 5.4. See [GTZ1] for a closely related approach to the study of mapping spaces, in which one approaches the cohomology of a mapping space as a Hochschild homology-type invariant of the cohomology of the target.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6