ScalingStacks

We first consider the case that the boundary of MM is empty, so that the natural Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)β†’β‰…π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M,βˆ‚M)\conf_{i}(M)\xrightarrow{\cong}\conf_{i}(M,\partial M) is a homeomorphism, and the natural functor π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬β†’β‰ƒπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬βˆ‚\disk_{n/M}\xrightarrow{\simeq}\disk^{\partial}_{n/M} is an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. In this case we are to show that the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map of Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-spaces

π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi​(U)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\colim_{U\in\disk_{n/M}}\conf_{i}(U)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is an equivalence. After PropositionΒ 2.19, it is enough to show that the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant map of Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-topological spaces

(10) π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†Uβˆˆπ–£π—‚π—Œπ—„n/Mβ€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(U)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\underset{U\in{\sf Disk}_{n/M}}{\colim}\conf_{i}(U)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is a weak homotopy equivalence from the homotopy colimit. Each map π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(U)β†’π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(U)\to\conf_{i}(M) comprising this homotopy colimit is an open embedding. Also, for each element {1,…,i}→𝑐M\{1,\dots,i\}\xrightarrow{c}M of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M), choosing mutually disjoint Euclidean neighborhoods about each c⁑(j)∈Mc(j)\in M demonstrates that cc lies in the image of at least one such open embedding. Therefore this augmented diagram is an open cover of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M). This open cover of MM has the property that each finite intersection of its terms is covered by terms contained in this finite intersection. This is to say that this open cover of π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(M) is in fact a hypercover. That the mapΒ (10) is a weak homotopy equivalence follows from Corollary 1.6 ofΒ [DI].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6