ScalingStacks

2.1. BB-framings

We consider a topological category of nn-manifolds and embeddings among them. We use this to consider the tangent classifier, which thereafter offers the notion of a BB-framing on an nn-manifold, as well as an โˆž\infty-category of such.

0N2V

Definition 2.1. โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝn\mfld_{n} is the symmetric monoidal topological category for which an object is a topological nn-manifold that admits a finite good cover, which is to say a finite open cover by Euclidean spaces with the property that each non-empty intersection of terms in the cover is itself homeomorphic to a Euclidean space. The morphism spaces are spaces of embeddings, endowed with the compact-open topology. The symmetric monoidal structure is disjoint union.33 3 Thus, any Mโˆˆโ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnM\in\mfld_{n} has finitely many connected components, each of which is the interior of a compact manifold with (possibly empty) boundary. This size restriction is not an essential requirement; since all noncompact manifolds are built as sequential colimits of such smaller manifolds, this smallness condition could be removed and one could instead add to Definition 3.15 the requirement that a homology theory preserves sequential colimits.

In particular, the mapping space is ๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnโก(๐–ฌ,๐–ญ)=๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(M,N)\Map_{\mfld_{n}}(M,N)=\Emb(M,N), the space of embeddings of MM into NN equipped with the compact-open topology. Note that disjoint union is not the coproduct; โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝn\mfld_{n} has almost no nontrivial colimits.

We will be particularly interested in nn-manifolds equipped with some extra structure such as an orientation or a framing. Structure of this sort can be swiftly accommodated by way of the tangent classifier: each nn-manifold MM has a tangent microbundle, and it is classified by a map ฯ„M:Mโ†’๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\tau_{M}\colon M\to\BTop(n) to the classifying space of the topological group ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n){\sf Top}(n) of self-homeomorphisms of โ„n\mathbb{R}^{n}; see [MS]. For Bโ†’๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)B\to\BTop(n) a map of spaces, a BB-framing on MM is a homotopy commutative diagram among spaces

B\textstyle{B\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}M\textstyle{M\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฯ„M\scriptstyle{\tau_{M}}g\scriptstyle{g}๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡).\textstyle{\BTop(n).}
0N2W

Example 2.2. Consider the composite continuous homomorphism

๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)โ†’(โˆ’)+๐– ๐—Ž๐—โˆ—โ€‹(Sn)โ†’ฯ€0โ„ค/2โ€‹โ„ค{\sf Top}(n)\xrightarrow{~(-)^{+}~}{\sf Aut}_{\ast}(S^{n})\xrightarrow{~\pi_{0}~}\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}

given by applying 1-point compactification to obtain based homotopy automorphisms of a sphere followed by taking path components. For ๐–ฒ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)โŠ‚๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n){\sf STop}(n)\subset{\sf Top}(n) the kernel of this homomorphism, a ๐–ก๐–ฒ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n){\sf BSTop}(n)-framing on a topological nn-manifold is precisely an orientation.

Toward formulating an โˆž\infty-category of BB-framed nn-manifolds, we next explain how to make the tangent classifier continuously functorial among open embeddings. We will make ongoing use of the following result of Kister and Mazur.

0N2X

Theorem 2.3 ([Ki]). The continuous homomorphism of topological monoids ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)โ†’๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(โ„n,โ„n){\sf Top}(n)\to{\sf Emb}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n}) is a homotopy equivalence.

Now, temporarily consider the full โˆž\infty-subcategory โ„ฐโ€‹๐—Ž๐–ผnโŠ‚โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝn\mathcal{E}{\sf uc}_{n}\subset\mfld_{n} consisting solely of โ„n\mathbb{R}^{n}; this โˆž\infty-category is that associated to the topological monoid ๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(โ„n,โ„n)\Emb(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n}) of self-embeddings of โ„n\mathbb{R}^{n}. We draw an immediate consequence of the Kisterโ€“Mazur Theorem.

0N2Y

Corollary 2.4. The canonical functor

๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โŸถโ„ฐโ€‹๐—Ž๐–ผ๐—‡\BTop(n)\longrightarrow\mathcal{E}{\sf uc}_{n}

is an equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories. In particular, there is a preferred equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories

๐–ฏ๐–ฒ๐—๐—โก(โ„ฐโ€‹๐—Ž๐–ผ๐—‡)โ‰ƒ๐–ฒ๐—‰๐–บ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—Œ/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\Psh(\mathcal{E}{\sf uc}_{n})~\simeq~\spaces_{/\BTop(n)}

between space-valued presheaves on โ„ฐโ€‹๐—Ž๐–ผn\mathcal{E}{\sf uc}_{n} and spaces over ๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\BTop(n).

After Corollaryย 2.4 we have a tangent classifier, functorial in a coherent homotopy sense, given by the restricted Yoneda functor:

(1) ฯ„:โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnโŸถ๐–ฏ๐–ฒ๐—๐—โก(โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝn)โŸถ๐–ฏ๐–ฒ๐—๐—โก(โ„ฐโ€‹๐—Ž๐–ผ๐—‡)โ€‹โ‰ƒCorโ€‹2.4โ€‹๐–ฒ๐—‰๐–บ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—Œ/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡).\tau\colon\mfld_{n}\longrightarrow\Psh(\mfld_{n})\longrightarrow\Psh(\mathcal{E}{\sf uc}_{n})~\underset{\rm Cor~\ref{euc}}{\simeq}~\spaces_{/\BTop(n)}~.

We will postpone to Corollaryย 2.13 justification for this terminology. To define the โˆž\infty-category of BB-framed nn-manifolds as it is equipped with a symmetric monoidal structure, we record a few standard facts about โˆž\infty-categories together with an observation about the functor ฯ„\tau.

0N2Z

Lemma 2.5. Let ๐’ฎ\mathcal{S} be an โˆž\infty-category and let Sโˆˆ๐’ฎS\in\mathcal{S} be an object.

  1. (1)

    For each morphism Sโ€ฒโ†’SS^{\prime}\to S in ๐’ฎ\mathcal{S}, the canonical functor among over โˆž\infty-categories (๐’ฎ/S)/(Sโ€ฒโ†’S)โ†’๐’ฎ/Sโ€ฒ(\mathcal{S}_{/S})_{/(S^{\prime}\to S)}\to\mathcal{S}_{/S^{\prime}} is an equivalence.

  2. (2)

    Should ๐’ฎ\mathcal{S} admit finite coproducts, the over โˆž\infty-category ๐’ฎ/S\mathcal{S}_{/S} admits finite coproducts and they are preserved by the projection functor ๐’ฎ/Sโ†’๐’ฎ\mathcal{S}_{/S}\to\mathcal{S}.

In addition, the โˆž\infty-category of symmetric monoidal โˆž\infty-categories ๐–ข๐–บ๐—โˆžโŠ—{\sf Cat}_{\infty}^{\otimes} admits limits and they are preserved by the forgetful functor ๐–ข๐–บ๐—โˆžโŠ—โ†’๐–ข๐–บ๐—โˆž{\sf Cat}_{\infty}^{\otimes}\to\Cat.

0N30

Proof. Through the defining adjunctions for over โˆž\infty-categories, the first assertion follows because, for each โˆž\infty-category ๐’ฆ\mathcal{K}, the canonical diagram among โˆž\infty-categories

{0}\textstyle{\{0\}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}{0<1}\textstyle{\{0<1\}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’ฆโ‹†{0}\textstyle{\mathcal{K}\star\{0\}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐’ฆโ‹†{0<1}\textstyle{\mathcal{K}\star\{0<1\}}

is a pushout; here, for ๐’ฆ\mathcal{K} and ๐’ฅ\mathcal{J} โˆž\infty-categories,

๐’ฆโ‹†โ„:=๐’ฆโˆ๐’ฆร—{0}ร—โ„๐’ฆร—{0<1}ร—โ„โˆ๐’ฆร—{1}ร—โ„โ„\mathcal{K}\star\mathcal{I}~:=~\mathcal{K}\underset{\mathcal{K}\times\{0\}\times\mathcal{I}}{\coprod}\mathcal{K}\times\{0<1\}\times\mathcal{I}\underset{\mathcal{K}\times\{1\}\times\mathcal{I}}{\coprod}\mathcal{I}

denotes the join of โˆž\infty-categories. The second assertion follows directly from the universal property of coproducts. The final assertion follows from Propositionย 3.2.2.1 ofย [Lu2], which in particular gives that, for each Cartesian closed presentable โˆž\infty-category ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, the forgetful functor from commutative algebras ๐– ๐—…๐—€๐–ข๐—ˆ๐—†โก(๐’žร—)โ†’๐’ž\Alg_{\sf Com}(\mathcal{C}^{\times})\to\mathcal{C} preserves and creates limits. Apply this result to the case ๐’ž=๐–ข๐–บ๐—โˆž\mathcal{C}=\Cat.

โˆŽ

0N31

Observation 2.6. Because โ„n\mathbb{R}^{n} is connected, this tangent classifier ฯ„:โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnโ†’๐–ฒ๐—‰๐–บ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—Œ/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\tau\colon\mfld_{n}\to\spaces_{/\BTop(n)} is symmetric monoidal with respect to coproducts in the codomain. In other words, ฯ„\tau carries finite disjoint unions to finite coproducts over ๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\BTop(n).

0N32

Definition 2.7. The symmetric monoidal โˆž\oo-category โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnB\mfld_{n}^{B} of BB-framed topological nn-manifolds is the limit in the following diagram:

โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝnB\textstyle{\mfld^{B}_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ฒ๐—‰๐–บ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—Œ/B\textstyle{\spaces_{/B}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}โ„ณโ€‹๐–ฟ๐—…๐–ฝn\textstyle{\mfld_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฯ„\scriptstyle{\tau}๐–ฒ๐—‰๐–บ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—Œ/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡).\textstyle{\spaces_{/\BTop(n)}.}

Since passage from โˆž\oo-categories to their spaces of morphisms preserves limits, there is a corresponding expression for mapping spaces: for two BB-framed manifolds, MM and NN, the space of BB-framed embeddings of MM to NN is the homotopy pullback

๐–ค๐—†๐–ปBโก(M,N)\textstyle{\Emb^{B}(M,N)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–กโก(๐–ฌ,๐–ญ)\textstyle{\Map_{/B}(M,N)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(M,N)\textstyle{\Emb(M,N)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โก(๐–ฌ,๐–ญ),\textstyle{\Map_{/\sf BTop(n)}(M,N),}

where ๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–ทโก(๐–ฌ,๐–ญ)\Map_{/X}(M,N) is the space of maps of MM to NN over XX, a point of which can be taken to be a map Mโ†’NM\rightarrow N and a homotopy between the two resulting maps from MM to XX.

The following assures us that these spaces of BB-framed embeddings have tractable homotopy types.

0N33

Lemma 2.8. A BB-framing gg of โ„n\mathbb{R}^{n} determines a homotopy equivalence ๐–ค๐—†๐–ปBโก(โ„n,โ„n)โ‰ƒฮฉgโ€‹B\Emb^{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\simeq\Omega_{g}B of topological monoids, where ฮฉgโ€‹B\Omega_{g}B is the loop space of BB based at the homotopy point g:โ„nโ†’Bg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow B.

0N34

Proof. By definition, the space ๐–ค๐—†๐–ปBโก(โ„n,โ„n)\Emb^{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n}) sits in a homotopy pullback square:

๐–ค๐—†๐–ปBโก(โ„n,โ„n)\textstyle{\Emb^{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–กโก(โ„๐—‡,โ„๐—‡)\textstyle{\Map_{/\negthinspace B}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(โ„n,โ„n)\textstyle{\Emb(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โก(โ„๐—‡,โ„๐—‡).\textstyle{\Map_{/\BTop(n)}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n}).}

There are evident equivalences of spaces ๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โก(โ„๐—‡,โ„๐—‡)โ‰ƒฮฉโ€‹๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โ‰ƒ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)\Map_{/\BTop(n)}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\simeq\Omega\BTop(n)\simeq\Top(n) and likewise ๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–กโก(โ„๐—‡,โ„๐—‡)โ‰ƒฮฉ๐—€โ€‹๐–ก\Map_{/\negthinspace B}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\simeq\Omega_{g}B. It is standard that the the composite map of spaces

๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)โŸถ๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(โ„n,โ„n)โŸถ๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‰/๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)โก(โ„๐—‡,โ„๐—‡)โ‰ƒฮฉโ€‹๐–ก๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(๐—‡)\Top(n)\longrightarrow\Emb(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\longrightarrow\Map_{/\BTop(n)}(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n})\simeq\Omega\BTop(n)

is an equivalence. By Kisterโ€“Mazur, Theorem 2.3, the first map including ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰โก(n)\Top(n) into ๐–ค๐—†๐–ปโก(โ„n,โ„n)\Emb(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n}) is a homotopy equivalence. It follows that the middle map in the above display is also an equivalence of spaces. We conclude that the bottom horizontal map in the above homotopy pullback square is an equivalence of spaces. This implies the top horizontal map too is an equivalence of spaces.

โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6