Definition 2.1. is the symmetric monoidal topological category for which an object is a topological -manifold that admits a finite good cover, which is to say a finite open cover by Euclidean spaces with the property that each non-empty intersection of terms in the cover is itself homeomorphic to a Euclidean space. The morphism spaces are spaces of embeddings, endowed with the compact-open topology. The symmetric monoidal structure is disjoint union.33 3 Thus, any has finitely many connected components, each of which is the interior of a compact manifold with (possibly empty) boundary. This size restriction is not an essential requirement; since all noncompact manifolds are built as sequential colimits of such smaller manifolds, this smallness condition could be removed and one could instead add to Definition 3.15 the requirement that a homology theory preserves sequential colimits.
2.1. -framings
We consider a topological category of -manifolds and embeddings among them. We use this to consider the tangent classifier, which thereafter offers the notion of a -framing on an -manifold, as well as an -category of such.
In particular, the mapping space is , the space of embeddings of into equipped with the compact-open topology. Note that disjoint union is not the coproduct; has almost no nontrivial colimits.
We will be particularly interested in -manifolds equipped with some extra structure such as an orientation or a framing. Structure of this sort can be swiftly accommodated by way of the tangent classifier: each -manifold has a tangent microbundle, and it is classified by a map to the classifying space of the topological group of self-homeomorphisms of ; see [MS]. For a map of spaces, a -framing on is a homotopy commutative diagram among spaces
Example 2.2. Consider the composite continuous homomorphism
given by applying 1-point compactification to obtain based homotopy automorphisms of a sphere followed by taking path components. For the kernel of this homomorphism, a -framing on a topological -manifold is precisely an orientation.
Toward formulating an -category of -framed -manifolds, we next explain how to make the tangent classifier continuously functorial among open embeddings. We will make ongoing use of the following result of Kister and Mazur.
Theorem 2.3 ([Ki]). The continuous homomorphism of topological monoids is a homotopy equivalence.
Now, temporarily consider the full -subcategory consisting solely of ; this -category is that associated to the topological monoid of self-embeddings of . We draw an immediate consequence of the KisterโMazur Theorem.
Corollary 2.4. The canonical functor
is an equivalence of -categories. In particular, there is a preferred equivalence of -categories
between space-valued presheaves on and spaces over .
After Corollaryย 2.4 we have a tangent classifier, functorial in a coherent homotopy sense, given by the restricted Yoneda functor:
| (1) |
We will postpone to Corollaryย 2.13 justification for this terminology. To define the -category of -framed -manifolds as it is equipped with a symmetric monoidal structure, we record a few standard facts about -categories together with an observation about the functor .
Lemma 2.5. Let be an -category and let be an object.
- (1)
For each morphism in , the canonical functor among over -categories is an equivalence.
- (2)
Should admit finite coproducts, the over -category admits finite coproducts and they are preserved by the projection functor .
In addition, the -category of symmetric monoidal -categories admits limits and they are preserved by the forgetful functor .
Proof. Through the defining adjunctions for over -categories, the first assertion follows because, for each -category , the canonical diagram among -categories
is a pushout; here, for and -categories,
denotes the join of -categories. The second assertion follows directly from the universal property of coproducts. The final assertion follows from Propositionย 3.2.2.1 ofย [Lu2], which in particular gives that, for each Cartesian closed presentable -category , the forgetful functor from commutative algebras preserves and creates limits. Apply this result to the case .
โ
Observation 2.6. Because is connected, this tangent classifier is symmetric monoidal with respect to coproducts in the codomain. In other words, carries finite disjoint unions to finite coproducts over .
Definition 2.7. The symmetric monoidal -category of -framed topological -manifolds is the limit in the following diagram:
Since passage from -categories to their spaces of morphisms preserves limits, there is a corresponding expression for mapping spaces: for two -framed manifolds, and , the space of -framed embeddings of to is the homotopy pullback
where is the space of maps of to over , a point of which can be taken to be a map and a homotopy between the two resulting maps from to .
The following assures us that these spaces of -framed embeddings have tractable homotopy types.
Lemma 2.8. A -framing of determines a homotopy equivalence of topological monoids, where is the loop space of based at the homotopy point .
Proof. By definition, the space sits in a homotopy pullback square:
There are evident equivalences of spaces and likewise . It is standard that the the composite map of spaces
is an equivalence. By KisterโMazur, Theorem 2.3, the first map including into is a homotopy equivalence. It follows that the middle map in the above display is also an equivalence of spaces. We conclude that the bottom horizontal map in the above homotopy pullback square is an equivalence of spaces. This implies the top horizontal map too is an equivalence of spaces.
โ
Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6