ScalingStacks

3.3. Homology theories

We now give our second main definition of this paper, that of a homology theory. First, note that taking products of manifolds defines a functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nβˆ’1B×ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽1π—ˆπ—‹β†’β„³β€‹π–Ώπ—…π–½nB\mfld_{n-1}^{B}\times\mfld_{1}^{\sf or}\rightarrow\mfld_{n}^{B}, where ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽1π—ˆπ—‹\mfld_{1}^{\sf or} is oriented 1-manifolds and

ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nβˆ’1B:=ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nβˆ’1β‘Γ—π–²π—‰π–Ίπ–Όπ–Ύπ—Œ/π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)β€‹π–²π—‰π–Ίπ–Όπ–Ύπ—Œ/B\mfld_{n-1}^{B}:=\mfld_{n-1}\underset{\spaces_{/{\sf BTop(n)}}}{\times}\spaces_{/B}

is the ∞\oo-category of (nβˆ’1)(n-1)-manifolds with a BB-framing on the product of their tangent bundle product with a trivial line bundle. Consequently, any BB-framed nn-manifold of the form M0×ℝM_{0}\times\mathbb{R}, where M0M_{0} is an (nβˆ’1)(n-1)-manifold, can be given the structure of a π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„πŸ£π—ˆπ—‹\disk_{1}^{\sf or}-algebra in ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB\mfld_{n}^{B}, since ℝ\mathbb{R} has the structure of a π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„πŸ£π—ˆπ—‹\disk_{1}^{\sf or}-algebra in ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽1π—ˆπ—‹\mfld_{1}^{\sf or}.

0N42

Definition 3.13 (Collar-gluing). A collar-gluing among BB-framed nn-manifolds is a continuous map

f:Mβ†’[βˆ’1,1]f\colon M\to[-1,1]

to the closed interval for which the restriction f|:M|(βˆ’1,1)β†’(βˆ’1,1)f_{|}\colon M_{|(-1,1)}\to(-1,1) is a manifold bundle. We will often denote a collar-gluing M→𝑓[βˆ’1,1]M\xrightarrow{f}[-1,1] simply as the open cover

M′​⋃M0×ℝ​Mβ€²β€²β‰…MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}~\cong~M

where Mβ€²=fβˆ’1[βˆ’1,1)M^{\prime}=f^{-1}[-1,1) and Mβ€²β€²=fβˆ’1(βˆ’1,1]M^{\prime\prime}=f^{-1}(-1,1] and M0=fβˆ’1​{0}M_{0}=f^{-1}\{0\}.

0N43

Remark 3.14. We find it useful to think of a collar-gluing as the data of a manifold MM together with a codimension-1 properly embedded submanifold M0βŠ‚MM_{0}\subset M that splits the manifold MM into two disconnected parts, Mβ€²M^{\prime} and Mβ€²β€²M^{\prime\prime}. Such data is afforded by gluing two manifolds with boundary along a common boundary. The actual data of a collar-gluing specifies that named just above, in addition to a bi-collaring M0×ℝβ†ͺMM_{0}\times\mathbb{R}\hookrightarrow M of M0βŠ‚MM_{0}\subset M.

ConstructionΒ 2.21 offers, for each collar-gluing M→𝑓[βˆ’1,1]M\xrightarrow{f}[-1,1] among BB-framed nn-manifolds, a monoidal functor

fβˆ’1:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„πŸ£/[βˆ’πŸ£,𝟣]βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹βŸΆβ„³β€‹π–Ώπ—…π–½n/MB.f^{-1}\colon\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{1/[-1,1]}\longrightarrow\mfld^{B}_{n/M}~.

In particular, for each symmetric monoidal functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→ℱ𝒱\mfld^{B}_{n}\xrightarrow{\mathcal{F}}\mathcal{V} with βŠ—\otimes-presentable codomain, there is a canonical morphism in 𝒱\mathcal{V}:

(6) ℱ⁑(Mβ€²)​⨂ℱ⁑(M0×ℝ)​ℱ​(Mβ€²β€²)​≃Cor​3.12β€‹βˆ«[βˆ’1,1]β„±βˆ˜fβˆ’1βŸΆβ„±β‘(M).\mathcal{F}(M^{\prime})\underset{\mathcal{F}(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R})}{\bigotimes}\mathcal{F}(M^{\prime\prime})~\underset{\rm Cor~\ref{interval}}{\simeq}~\int_{[-1,1]}\mathcal{F}\circ f^{-1}~\longrightarrow~\mathcal{F}(M)~.
0N44

Definition 3.15. A symmetric monoidal functor β„±:ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝒱\mathcal{F}:\mfld_{n}^{B}\rightarrow\mathcal{V} satisfies βŠ—\otimes-excision if, for each collar-gluing M′​⋃M0×ℝ​Mβ€²β€²β‰…MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M among BB-framed nn-manifolds, the canonical morphismΒ (6)

ℱ⁑(Mβ€²)​⨂ℱ⁑(M0×ℝ)​ℱ​(Mβ€²β€²)→≃ℱ⁑(M)\mathcal{F}(M^{\prime})\underset{\mathcal{F}(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R})}{\bigotimes}\mathcal{F}(M^{\prime\prime})\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}\mathcal{F}(M)

is an equivalence in 𝒱\mathcal{V}. The ∞\oo-category of homology theories for BB-framed nn-manifolds valued in 𝒱\mathcal{V} is the full ∞\oo-subcategory

𝐇⁑(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝒱)βŠ‚π–₯π—Žπ—‡βŠ—β‘(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝒱)\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\mathcal{V})~\subset~\Fun^{\otimes}(\mfld^{B}_{n},\mathcal{V})

consisting of those symmetric monoidal functors that satisfy βŠ—\otimes-excision.

0N45

Remark 3.16. The behavior of a homology theory with coefficients in 𝒱\mathcal{V} depends critically on the symmetric monoidal structure chosen on 𝒱\mathcal{V}. For instance, for the symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category (π–¬π—ˆπ–½π—„,βŠ•)(\m_{k},\oplus) of kk-modules over a fixed field kk with direct sum, a homology theory is forced to be ordinary homology with coefficients in kk; while for (π–¬π—ˆπ–½π—„,βŠ—)(\m_{k},\otimes), a homology theories is typically not a homotopy invariant of manifolds.

0N46

Remark 3.17. One can complete the ∞\oo-category ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽n\mfld_{n} as follows: first, formally adjoin, for every collar-gluing M′​⋃M0×ℝ​Mβ€²β€²β‰…MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M, the colimit of the simplicial object π–‘π–Ίπ—‹βˆ™β€‹(Mβ€²,M0×ℝ,Mβ€²β€²){\sf Bar}_{\bullet}(M^{\prime},M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},M^{\prime\prime}); second, Dwyer-Kan localize by forcing the natural map from this new object |π–‘π–Ίπ—‹βˆ™β€‹(Mβ€²,M0×ℝ,Mβ€²β€²)|β†’M|{\sf Bar}_{\bullet}(M^{\prime},M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},M^{\prime\prime})|\rightarrow M to be an equivalence. Denote this completion of the ∞\oo-category of manifolds as ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽^n\widehat{\mfld}_{n}. The completion functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽n→ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽^n\mfld_{n}\rightarrow\widehat{\mfld}_{n} is the universal homology theory: that is, we now have the suggestive equivalence

∫Mℝn≃M\int_{M}\mathbb{R}^{n}~\simeq~M

as objects of ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽^n\widehat{\mfld}_{n} (the lefthand side is not defined in ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽n\mfld_{n}). By this universal property, a βŠ—\otimes-excisive functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽n→𝒱\mfld_{n}\rightarrow\mathcal{V} is equivalent to a symmetric monoidal functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽^n→𝒱\widehat{\mfld}_{n}\rightarrow\mathcal{V} that preserves geometric realizations of simplicial objects.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6