ScalingStacks

4. Nonabelian Poincaré duality

Applying Theorem 3.24, we offer a slightly different perspective, and proof, of the nonabelian Poincaré duality of Salvatore [Sa], Segal [Se3], and Lurie [Lu2], which calculate factorization homology with coefficients in iterated loop spaces as a compactly supported mapping space.

0N4T

Definition 4.1. For a space BB, the ∞\infty-category 𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡\Space_{B} is that of retractive spaces over BB. The ∞\oo-category 𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡≥𝗇\Space^{\geq n}_{B} is the full ∞\oo-subcategory of 𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡\Space_{B} consisting of those X⇄BX\rightleftarrows B for which the retraction is nn-connective, that is, π∗​X→π∗​B\pi_{*}X\rightarrow\pi_{*}B is an isomorphism for ∗<n*<n with any choice of base-point of BB.

Equivalently, an object X∈𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡≥𝗇X\in\Space_{B}^{\geq n} may be thought of as a fibration X→BX\rightarrow B with a distinguished section for which, for each b∈Bb\in B, the fiber XbX_{b} is nn-connective.

0N4U

Definition 4.2. For X∈𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡X\in\Space_{B} and M→BM\rightarrow B a space over BB, the space Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\Gammac(M,X) of compactly supported sections of XX over MM is the subspace of 𝖬𝖺𝗉/𝖡⁡(𝖬,𝖷)\Map_{/B}(M,X) consisting of those maps f:M→Xf\colon M\to X over BB for which there is a compact subspace K⊂MK\subset M with the property that the restriction factors through the section: f|M∖K:M→B→Xf_{|M\smallsetminus K}:M\to B\to X.

For B→𝖡𝖳𝗈𝗉⁡(𝗇)B\rightarrow\BTop(n) as before, note that Γ𝖼⁡(−,X)\Gammac(-,X) defines a covariant functor ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌\mfld_{n}^{B}\rightarrow\Space. By inspection, this functor carries finite disjoint unions to finite products of spaces, which is to say that Γ𝖼⁡(−,X)\Gammac(-,X) is symmetric monoidal with respect to the Cartesian monoidal structure on the ∞\infty-category of spaces.

To easily state the next result, Theorem 4.4, we introduce some terminology. Each point g∈Bg\in B determines a symmetric monoidal functor 𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖿𝗋→𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡\disk_{n}^{\fr}\to\disk_{n}^{B}. Thereafter, each symmetric monoidal functor A:𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡→𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌A\colon\disk_{n}^{B}\to\spaces determines the associative monoid

π0​(A,g):𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝟣𝖿𝗋→ℝ𝗇−𝟣×−𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖿𝗋⟶𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡→𝖠𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌→π0𝖲𝖾𝗍.\pi_{0}(A,g)\colon\disk_{1}^{\fr}\xrightarrow{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times-}\disk_{n}^{\fr}\longrightarrow\disk_{n}^{B}\xrightarrow{~A~}\spaces\xrightarrow{~\pi_{0}~}{\sf Set}~.

We say AA is group-like if, for each g∈Bg\in B, this monoid π0​(A,g)\pi_{0}(A,g) is a group.

0N4V

Example 4.3. In the case B≃∗B\simeq\ast so that a BB-framing is a framing in the standard sense, a symmetric monoidal functor A:𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖿𝗋→𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌A\colon\disk_{n}^{\sf fr}\to\spaces is the data of an ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-algebra, and this ℰn\mathcal{E}_{n}-algebra is group-like in the standard sense if and only if AA is group-like in the the sense just above.

0N4W

Theorem 4.4. The functor Γ𝖼:𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡→𝖥𝗎𝗇⊗⁡(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌)\Gammac:\Space_{B}\rightarrow\Fun^{\otimes}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\Space) restricts as a fully faithful functor

𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡≥𝗇↪𝐇⁡(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌)\Space_{B}^{\geq n}~\hookrightarrow~\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\Space)

from nn-connective retractive spaces over BB to homology theories. The essential image consists of those ℱ\mathcal{F} for which the restriction ℱ|𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡\mathcal{F}_{|\disk_{n}^{B}} is group-like.

The following is the core technical detail in the proof of Theorem 4.4, that the assignment of compactly supported sections Γ𝖼⁡(−,X)\Gammac(-,X) is ⊗\otimes-excisive in our sense, provided the retraction X→BX\rightarrow B is sufficiently connected. The fullness of the functor above is a parametrized form of May’s theorem from [Ma], identifying nn-connective objects as 𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖿𝗋\disk^{\fr}_{n}-algebras, which is Theorem 5.1.3.6 of [Lu2].

0N4X

Lemma 4.5. Let MM be BB-framed manifold, equipped with a collar-gluing M′​⋃M0×ℝ​M′′≅MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M. Let X∈𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡≥𝗇X\in\Space^{\geq n}_{B} be an nn-connective space over BB. There is a natural weak homotopy equivalence

Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)​×Γ𝖼⁡(M0×ℝ,X)​Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)≃Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\underset{\Gammac(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},X)}{\times}\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)~\simeq~\Gammac(M,X)

between the quotient of the product Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)×Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\times\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X) by the diagonal action of Γ𝖼⁡(M0×ℝ,X)\Gammac(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},X) and the space of compactly supported sections of XX over MM.

0N4Y

Proof. Since M0↪MM_{0}\hookrightarrow M is a proper embedding, a compactly supported section over MM can be restricted to obtain a compactly supported section over M0M_{0}, as well as over M∖M′M\smallsetminus M^{\prime} and over M∖M′′M\smallsetminus M^{\prime\prime}. Namely, there is a diagram among spaces of compactly supported sections

Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)×Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\times\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M,X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M∖M′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M\smallsetminus M^{\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M∖M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M\smallsetminus M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X).\textstyle{\Gammac(M_{0},X).}

By inspection, the bottom horizontal sequence is a fiber sequence, as is the right vertical sequence, as is the diagonal sequence. Also, the inner square is pullback because M′​⋃M0×ℝ​M′′≅MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M is a pushout. Because M0⊂MM_{0}\subset M is equipped with a regular neighborhood, these fiber sequences are in fact Serre fibration sequences, and so the inner square is a weak homotopy pullback square. In particular, there is a right homotopy coherent action of Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X) on Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X), a left homotopy coherent action of Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X) on Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X), and a continuous map of topological spaces

(7) Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)​×Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)​Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)⟶Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\underset{\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X)}{\times}\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\longrightarrow\Gammac(M,X)

from the balanced homotopy coinvariants. Because X→BX\to B is nn-connective and M0M_{0} is (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional, the base Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Gammac(M_{0},X) is connected. It follows that the map (7) is in fact a weak homotopy equivalence. The assertion follows after the canonical identification Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)≅Γ𝖼⁡(M0×ℝ,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X)\cong\Gammac(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},X) as group-like ℰ1\mathcal{E}_{1}-spaces.

∎

As a consequence, we recover the following theorem of Salvatore [Sa], Segal [Se3], and Lurie [Lu2].

0N4Z

Corollary 4.6 (Nonabelian Poincaré duality). For any XX in 𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖡≥𝗇\Space_{B}^{\geq n}, with associated 𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡\disk^{B}_{n}-algebra ΩBn​X∈𝖠𝗅𝗀𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡⁡(𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌)\Omega_{B}^{n}X\in\Alg_{\disk^{B}_{n}}(\Space), there is a natural equivalence

∫MΩBn​X≃Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\int_{M}\Omega_{B}^{n}X~\simeq~\Gammac(M,X)

between the factorization homology of a BB-framed nn-manifold MM with coefficients in ΩBn​X\Omega^{n}_{B}X and the space of compactly supported sections of XX over MM.

0N50

Proof. We apply Theorem 3.24: Since Γ𝖼⁡(−,X)\Gammac(-,X) is a homology theory, it is equivalent to factorization homology with coefficients in Γ𝖼⁡(ℝn,X)\Gammac(\mathbb{R}^{n},X), which is identified as the nn-fold loop space of the fiber of the map X→BX\rightarrow B, Γ𝖼⁡(ℝn,X)≃ΩBn​X\Gammac(\mathbb{R}^{n},X)\simeq\Omega^{n}_{B}X. ∎

This result specializes to Poincaré duality between twisted homology and compactly supported cohomology, as we will now explain. Given X≃𝖡𝖳𝗈𝗉⁡(𝗇)×𝖪⁡(𝖠,𝗂)X\simeq\BTop(n)\times K(A,i) a product with an Eilenberg-MacLane space, then Ω𝖡𝖳𝗈𝗉⁡(𝗇)n​X≃𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁡(ℝn,K⁡(A,i))≃K⁡(A,i−n)\Omega^{n}_{\BTop(n)}X\simeq\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},K(A,i))\simeq K(A,i-n) is an nn-disk algebra in spaces, where the multiplication is the usual group structure on K⁡(A,i−n)K(A,i-n) but is equipped with a nontrivial action of 𝖳𝗈𝗉⁡(n)\Top(n). We then have an equivalence of spaces

∫M𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁡(ℝn,K⁡(A,i))≃𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁡(M,K⁡(A,i))\int_{M}\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},K(A,i))\simeq\Mapc(M,K(A,i))

which is the space level version of the equivalence 𝖧∗τ​(M,A⁡[i−n])≃𝖧𝖼∗​(M,A⁡[i])\mathsf{H}_{*}^{\tau}(M,A[i-n])\simeq\mathsf{H}^{*}_{\sf c}(M,A[i]), obtained by applying Ω∞\Omega^{\infty} to the spectrum level equivalence given by Atiyah duality. Given an AA-orientation of MM, then one can additionally untwist the lefthand side, as usual.

0N51

Remark 4.7. The factorization homology ∫MΩBn​X\int_{M}\Omega^{n}_{B}X is built from configuration spaces of disks in MM with labels defined by X→BX\to B, and the preceding result thereby has roots in the configuration space models of mapping spaces dating to the work of Segal, May, McDuff and others in the 1970s, see [Se1], [Ma], [Mc], and [Bö]. Factorization homology is not a generalization of the classical configuration spaces with labels, as described in [Bö], because the configuration space with labels in XX models a mapping space with target the nn-fold suspension of XX, rather than into XX itself. Instead, factorization homology generalizes the configuration spaces with summable or amalgamated labels of Salvatore [Sa] and Segal [Se3].

0N52

Proof of Theorem 4.4. Corollary 4.6 identifies the functor Γ𝖼:𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌B≥n→𝐇⁡(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌)\Gamma_{\sf c}\colon\spaces_{B}^{\geq n}\to\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\Space) as the composition Γ𝖼:𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌B≥n→ΩBn𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡→∫𝐇⁡(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌)\Gamma_{\sf c}\colon\spaces_{B}^{\geq n}\xrightarrow{\Omega^{n}_{B}}\disk_{n}^{B}\xrightarrow{\int}\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\Space). Theorem 3.24 gives that ∫\int is fully faithful, so it remains to argue that ΩBn\Omega_{B}^{n} is fully faithful with essential image the group-like 𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗇𝖡\disk_{n}^{B}-algebras in spaces. This is immediate because, for instance, 𝖲𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌/B\spaces_{/B} is an ∞\infty-topos (Theorem 5.1.3.6 of [Lu2]).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6