Definition 4.1. For a space , the -category is that of retractive spaces over . The -category is the full -subcategory of consisting of those for which the retraction is -connective, that is, is an isomorphism for with any choice of base-point of .
4. Nonabelian Poincaré duality
Applying Theorem 3.24, we offer a slightly different perspective, and proof, of the nonabelian Poincaré duality of Salvatore [Sa], Segal [Se3], and Lurie [Lu2], which calculate factorization homology with coefficients in iterated loop spaces as a compactly supported mapping space.
Equivalently, an object may be thought of as a fibration with a distinguished section for which, for each , the fiber is -connective.
Definition 4.2. For and a space over , the space of compactly supported sections of over is the subspace of consisting of those maps over for which there is a compact subspace with the property that the restriction factors through the section: .
For as before, note that defines a covariant functor . By inspection, this functor carries finite disjoint unions to finite products of spaces, which is to say that is symmetric monoidal with respect to the Cartesian monoidal structure on the -category of spaces.
To easily state the next result, Theorem 4.4, we introduce some terminology. Each point determines a symmetric monoidal functor . Thereafter, each symmetric monoidal functor determines the associative monoid
We say is group-like if, for each , this monoid is a group.
Example 4.3. In the case so that a -framing is a framing in the standard sense, a symmetric monoidal functor is the data of an -algebra, and this -algebra is group-like in the standard sense if and only if is group-like in the the sense just above.
Theorem 4.4. The functor restricts as a fully faithful functor
from -connective retractive spaces over to homology theories. The essential image consists of those for which the restriction is group-like.
The following is the core technical detail in the proof of Theorem 4.4, that the assignment of compactly supported sections is -excisive in our sense, provided the retraction is sufficiently connected. The fullness of the functor above is a parametrized form of May’s theorem from [Ma], identifying -connective objects as -algebras, which is Theorem 5.1.3.6 of [Lu2].
Lemma 4.5. Let be -framed manifold, equipped with a collar-gluing . Let be an -connective space over . There is a natural weak homotopy equivalence
between the quotient of the product by the diagonal action of and the space of compactly supported sections of over .
Proof. Since is a proper embedding, a compactly supported section over can be restricted to obtain a compactly supported section over , as well as over and over . Namely, there is a diagram among spaces of compactly supported sections
By inspection, the bottom horizontal sequence is a fiber sequence, as is the right vertical sequence, as is the diagonal sequence. Also, the inner square is pullback because is a pushout. Because is equipped with a regular neighborhood, these fiber sequences are in fact Serre fibration sequences, and so the inner square is a weak homotopy pullback square. In particular, there is a right homotopy coherent action of on , a left homotopy coherent action of on , and a continuous map of topological spaces
| (7) |
from the balanced homotopy coinvariants. Because is -connective and is -dimensional, the base is connected. It follows that the map (7) is in fact a weak homotopy equivalence. The assertion follows after the canonical identification as group-like -spaces.
∎
Corollary 4.6 (Nonabelian Poincaré duality). For any in , with associated -algebra , there is a natural equivalence
between the factorization homology of a -framed -manifold with coefficients in and the space of compactly supported sections of over .
Proof. We apply Theorem 3.24: Since is a homology theory, it is equivalent to factorization homology with coefficients in , which is identified as the -fold loop space of the fiber of the map , . ∎
This result specializes to Poincaré duality between twisted homology and compactly supported cohomology, as we will now explain. Given a product with an Eilenberg-MacLane space, then is an -disk algebra in spaces, where the multiplication is the usual group structure on but is equipped with a nontrivial action of . We then have an equivalence of spaces
which is the space level version of the equivalence , obtained by applying to the spectrum level equivalence given by Atiyah duality. Given an -orientation of , then one can additionally untwist the lefthand side, as usual.
Remark 4.7. The factorization homology is built from configuration spaces of disks in with labels defined by , and the preceding result thereby has roots in the configuration space models of mapping spaces dating to the work of Segal, May, McDuff and others in the 1970s, see [Se1], [Ma], [Mc], and [Bö]. Factorization homology is not a generalization of the classical configuration spaces with labels, as described in [Bö], because the configuration space with labels in models a mapping space with target the -fold suspension of , rather than into itself. Instead, factorization homology generalizes the configuration spaces with summable or amalgamated labels of Salvatore [Sa] and Segal [Se3].
Proof of Theorem 4.4. Corollary 4.6 identifies the functor as the composition . Theorem 3.24 gives that is fully faithful, so it remains to argue that is fully faithful with essential image the group-like -algebras in spaces. This is immediate because, for instance, is an -topos (Theorem 5.1.3.6 of [Lu2]).
∎
Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6