ScalingStacks

0N4M

Theorem 3.26. For 𝒱\mathcal{V} a symmetric monoidal ∞\oo-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable, and for Bβ†’π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)B\to\BTop(n) a map of spaces, there is an equivalence between ∞\infty-categories

∫:π– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡βˆ‚,𝖑⁑(𝒱)\textstyle{\displaystyle\int:\Alg_{\disk_{n}^{\partial,B}}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝐇⁑(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nβˆ‚,B,𝒱):𝖾𝗏ℝn,ℝnβˆ’1Γ—[0,1)\textstyle{\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{\partial,B},\mathcal{V}):{\sf ev}_{\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times[0,1)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}

from π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡βˆ‚,𝖑\disk^{\partial,B}_{n}-algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V} and homology theories of BB-framed nn-manifolds with coefficients in 𝒱\mathcal{V}. This equivalence is implemented by the factorization homology functor ∫\int and evaluation on BB-framed Euclidean nn-spaces and half-spaces.

0N4N

Proof. After PropositionΒ 3.9 it is enough to consider the case where BB is equivalent to π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)\BTop(n), and so we omit it from the notation and discussion. Let β„±:ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nβˆ‚β†’π’±\mathcal{F}:\mfld_{n}^{\partial}\rightarrow\mathcal{V} be a symmetric monoidal functor satisfying the βŠ—\otimes-excision condition, and let AA be the restriction of β„±\mathcal{F} to π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡βˆ‚\disk_{n}^{\partial}. For a manifold with boundary MΒ―\overline{M}, we prove that the canonical morphism ∫MΒ―A→ℱ⁑(MΒ―)\int_{\overline{M}}A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}(\overline{M}) is an equivalence. By βŠ—\otimes-excision applied to the collar-gluing βˆ‚MΒ―Γ—[0,1)β€‹β‹ƒβˆ‚M¯×ℝ​Mβ‰…MΒ―\partial\overline{M}\times[0,1)\underset{\partial\overline{M}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M\cong\overline{M}, where MM is the interior of MΒ―\overline{M}, we obtain a diagram in 𝒱\mathcal{V}

βˆ«βˆ‚MΒ―Γ—[0,1)​Aβ€‹β¨‚βˆ«βˆ‚M¯×ℝ​Aβ€‹βˆ«MA\textstyle{\displaystyle\underset{{\partial\overline{M}\times[0,1)}}{\int}A\underset{\underset{\partial\overline{M}\times\mathbb{R}}{\int}A}{\bigotimes}\int_{M}A\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℱ⁑(βˆ‚MΒ―Γ—[0,1))​⨂ℱ⁑(βˆ‚M¯×ℝ)​ℱ​(M)\textstyle{\mathcal{F}(\partial\overline{M}\times[0,1))\underset{\mathcal{F}(\partial\overline{M}\times\mathbb{R})}{\bigotimes}\mathcal{F}(M)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∫MΒ―A\textstyle{\displaystyle\int_{\overline{M}}A\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℱ⁑(MΒ―)\textstyle{\mathcal{F}(\overline{M})}

in which the vertical morphisms are equivalences. It now suffices to show that the top horizontal morphism is an equivalence. The equivalences of ∫MA→ℱ⁑(M)\int_{M}A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}(M) and βˆ«βˆ‚M¯×ℝA→ℱ⁑(βˆ‚M¯×ℝ)\int_{\partial\overline{M}\times\mathbb{R}}A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}(\partial\overline{M}\times\mathbb{R}) are given by Theorem 3.24; the last equivalence βˆ«βˆ‚MΒ―Γ—[0,1)A→ℱ⁑(βˆ‚MΒ―Γ—[0,1))\int_{\partial\overline{M}\times[0,1)}A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}({\partial\overline{M}\times[0,1)}) by follows by Theorem 3.24 and Proposition 2.16. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6