ScalingStacks

0N4I

Theorem 3.24. For 𝒱\mathcal{V} a symmetric monoidal ∞\oo-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable, there is an equivalence

∫:π– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\displaystyle\int:\Alg_{\disk_{n}^{B}}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝐇⁑(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝒱):𝖾𝗏ℝn\textstyle{\mathbf{H}(\mfld_{n}^{B},\mathcal{V}):{\sf ev}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}

between π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘\disk^{B}_{n}-algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V} and homology theories of BB-framed nn-manifolds with coefficients in 𝒱\mathcal{V}. This equivalence is implemented by the factorization homology functor ∫\int and the functor of evaluation on ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

0N4J

Proof. PropositionΒ 3.7 recognizes factorization homology as a symmetric monoidal left Kan extensions, thereby implementing the left adjoint in an adjunction

i!:π– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘(𝒱)⇄π–₯π—Žπ—‡βŠ—(ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB,𝒱):iβˆ—.i_{!}\colon\Alg_{\disk_{n}^{B}}(\mathcal{V})\rightleftarrows\Fun^{\otimes}\bigl(\mfld_{n}^{B},\mathcal{V}\bigr)\colon i^{\ast}~.

The unit of this adjunction is an equivalence because π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β†’β„³β€‹π–Ώπ—…π–½nB\disk_{n}^{B}\rightarrow\mfld_{n}^{B} is fully faithful, and the Kan extension along a fully faithful functor restricts as the original functor. The counit of this adjunction evaluates on a symmetric monoidal functor β„±\mathcal{F} as a morphism ∫Aβ†’β„±\int\!A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}, where A=β„±|ℝnA=\mathcal{F}_{|\mathbb{R}^{n}} is the π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘\disk^{B}_{n}-algebra defined by the values of β„±\mathcal{F} on disjoint unions of BB-framed Euclidean nn-spaces. It remains to verify that this counit is an equivalence.

Since both β„±\mathcal{F} and ∫A\int\!A are symmetric monoidal and agree on ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}, the map ∫MA→ℱ⁑(M)\int_{M}A\rightarrow\mathcal{F}(M) is an equivalence for MM isomorphic to a disjoint union of Euclidean spaces, M≅⨆IℝnM\cong\bigsqcup_{I}\mathbb{R}^{n}. Using induction, we will now see that the values of β„±\mathcal{F} and ∫A\int\!A agree on thickened spheres Sk×ℝnβˆ’kS^{k}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-k}, the base case of k=0k=0 just having been shown. In the inductive step, assume the result for Siβˆ’1×ℝnβˆ’i+1S^{i-1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i+1}. Choose a standard collar-gluing Si→𝑓[βˆ’1,1]S^{i}\xrightarrow{f}[-1,1] with Siβˆ’1=fβˆ’1​(0)βŠ‚SiS^{i-1}=f^{-1}(0)\subset S^{i} an equator. There results a collar-gluing of Si×ℝnβˆ’iS^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}. For β„±\mathcal{F} a homology theory, we obtain the equivalence ∫Si×ℝnβˆ’iA≃ℱ⁑(Si×ℝnβˆ’i)\int_{S^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}}A\simeq\mathcal{F}(S^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}) via the intermediate equvialences

∫Si×ℝnβˆ’i​Aβ‰ƒβˆ«β„βˆ’1i×ℝnβˆ’i​Aβ€‹β¨‚βˆ«Siβˆ’1×ℝnβˆ’i+1​Aβ€‹βˆ«β„+1i×ℝnβˆ’i​A≃ℱ⁑(β„βˆ’1i×ℝnβˆ’i)​⨂ℱ⁑(Siβˆ’1×ℝnβˆ’i+1)​ℱ​(ℝ+1i×ℝnβˆ’i)≃ℱ⁑(Si×ℝj)\underset{S^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}}{\int}\!A\simeq\underset{\mathbb{R}_{-1}^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}}{\int}\!A\underset{\underset{S^{i-1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i+1}}{\int}\negthinspace A}{\bigotimes}\ \underset{\mathbb{R}_{+1}^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i}}{\int}\!A\ \simeq\ \mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}_{-1}^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i})\underset{\mathcal{F}(S^{i-1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i+1})}{\bigotimes}\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}_{+1}^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-i})\simeq\mathcal{F}(S^{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{j})

where the first equivalence is by the βŠ—\otimes-excision property of factorization homology, the last equivalence is by the assumption that β„±\mathcal{F} is a homology theory, and the middle equivalence is by induction.

We now restrict to the case of BB-framed nn-manifolds where nn is not equal to 4. By the handlebody theory for topological manifolds ([KS] for n>5n>5, [Qu] for n=5n=5, and [Mo] for n=3n=3) all such manifolds admits a handle decomposition. We now prove the result outside dimension 4 by induction on the handle decomposition. The base case is assured. To verify the inductive step, let MM be obtained from M0M_{0} by adding a handle of index q+1q+1. Therefore MM can be expressed as a collar-gluing Mβ‰…M0​⋃Sq×ℝnβˆ’q​ℝnM\cong M_{0}\underset{S^{q}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-q}}{\bigcup}\mathbb{R}^{n}, where ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n} is an open neighborhood of the (q+1)(q+1)-handle in MM. The values β„±\mathcal{F} and ∫A\int\!A agree on the three constituent submanifolds of MM, and they both satisfy βŠ—\otimes-excision, so the values ℱ⁑(M)β‰ƒβˆ«MA\mathcal{F}(M)\simeq\int_{M}A are equivalent.

This leaves the case of topological 4-manifolds, which do not admit handle decompositions in general. Because both β„±\mathcal{F} and ∫A\int_{\!}A are symmetric monoidal, we can reduce to the case that MM is connected. Now, any connected topological 4-manifold MM admits a smooth structure on the complement Mβˆ–{x}M\smallsetminus\{x\} of a point x∈Mx\in M, [Qu]. Consequently, Mβˆ–{x}M\smallsetminus\{x\} admits a handle decomposition, which can be constructed from any Morse function on Mβˆ–{x}M\smallsetminus\{x\}, and the preceding argument thereby implies the equivalence ℱ⁑(Mβˆ–{x})β‰ƒβˆ«Mβˆ–{x}A\mathcal{F}(M\smallsetminus\{x\})\simeq\int_{M\smallsetminus\{x\}}A. Applying the βŠ—\otimes-excision property to the collar-gluing Mβˆ–{x}​⋃Snβˆ’1×ℝ​ℝnβ‰…MM\smallsetminus\{x\}\underset{S^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}\mathbb{R}^{n}\cong M, since β„±\mathcal{F} and ∫A\int\!A agree on the constituent submanifolds, we obtain the equivalence ℱ⁑(M)β‰ƒβˆ«MA\mathcal{F}(M)\simeq\int_{M}A. Therefore every homology theory β„±\mathcal{F} for nn-manifolds is equivalent to factorization homology with coefficients in ℱ⁑(ℝn)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^{n}).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6