ScalingStacks

0N38

Lemma 2.12. The maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘\disk_{n}^{B} is canonically identified as the space

∐iβ‰₯0​BΞ£ii≃(π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘)∼\underset{i\geq 0}{\coprod}{B}^{i}_{\Sigma_{i}}~\simeq~\bigl(\disk_{n}^{B}\bigr)^{\sim}

where the coproduct is indexed by finite cardinalities and each cofactor is the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-homotopy coinvariants of the ii-fold product of the space BB. In particular, the symmetric monoidal functor [βˆ’]:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β†’π–₯𝗂𝗇[-]\colon\disk_{n}^{B}\to\fin, given by taking sets of connected components of underlying manifolds, is conservative.

For MM a BB-framed nn-manifold, the maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑\disk^{B}_{n/M} is canonically identified as the space

∐iβ‰₯0β€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi​(M)Ξ£i≃(π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖑)∼\underset{i\geq 0}{\coprod}\conf_{i}(M)_{\Sigma_{i}}~\simeq~\bigl(\disk^{B}_{n/M}\bigr)^{\sim}

where the coproduct is indexed by finite cardinalities, and each cofactor is an unordered configuration space.

0N39

Proof. LemmaΒ 2.5 gives an equivalence π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬π–‘β‰ƒπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬\disk_{n/M}^{B}\simeq\disk_{n/M}. So it suffices to assume the case of an equality B=π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)B=\BTop(n).

The maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡\disk_{n} necessarily lies over the maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of π–₯𝗂𝗇\fin, which is ∐iβ‰₯0​𝖑​Σi\underset{i\geq 0}{\coprod}\mathsf{B}\Sigma_{i}. The first assertion will be implied upon verifying, for each iβ‰₯0i\geq 0, that the map

Ξ£iβ‰€π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(n)βŸΆπ–€π—†π–»β‘(βŠ”i​ℝn,βŠ”i​ℝn){\Sigma_{i}\wr{\sf Top}(n)}\longrightarrow\Emb(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n})

is weakly homotopy equivalent to an inclusion of connected components. This is an immediate consequence of the Kister–Mazur Theorem 2.3. Via translation, the inclusion of the subgroup of origin preserving homeomorphisms π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n)β†’β‰ƒπ–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(n)\Top_{0}(n)\xrightarrow{\simeq}\Top(n) is a homotopy equivalence, and so we recognize further the identification

∐iβ‰₯0​𝖑​(Ξ£iβ‰€π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n))→≃(π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡)∼.\underset{i\geq 0}{\coprod}\mathsf{B}(\Sigma_{i}\wr\Top_{0}(n))\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}(\disk_{n})^{\sim}~.

Because the projection π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–¬β†’π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡\disk_{n/M}\to\disk_{n} is a right fibration, we recognize the maximal ∞\infty-subgroupoid of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬\disk_{n/M} as

∐iβ‰₯0​𝖀𝗆𝖻⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)Ξ£iβ‰€π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n)→≃(π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬)∼.\underset{i\geq 0}{\coprod}\Emb\bigl(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M\bigr)_{\Sigma_{i}\wr\Top_{0}(n)}\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}(\disk_{n/M})^{\sim}~.

Therefore, the second assertion follows upon showing that the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant continuous map

𝖾𝗏0:𝖀𝗆𝖻⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n)iβŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M){\sf ev}_{0}\colon\Emb\bigl(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M\bigr)_{\Top_{0}(n)^{i}}\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is a weak homotopy equivalence. This is implied upon showing the homotopy fiber of the continuous map

𝖾𝗏0:𝖀𝗆𝖻⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)βŸΆπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M){\sf ev}_{0}\colon\Emb(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M)\longrightarrow\conf_{i}(M)

is weakly homotopy equivalent to π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n)i\Top_{0}(n)^{i}. In a standard manner, this map is a Serre fibration, and the fiber over c:{1,…,i}β†ͺMc\colon\{1,\dots,i\}\hookrightarrow M is the space 𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M) of embeddings under cc. Fix such a based embedding e0:βŠ”π‘–β€‹β„nβ†ͺMe_{0}\colon\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n}\hookrightarrow M. So we must show that the composite inclusion

π–³π—ˆπ—‰0⁑(n)iβ†ͺ𝖀𝗆𝖻⁑((0βˆˆβ„n),(0βˆˆβ„n))i≅𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,βŠ”i​ℝn)β†’βˆ’βˆ˜e0𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)\Top_{0}(n)^{i}\hookrightarrow\Emb((0\in\mathbb{R}^{n}),(0\in\mathbb{R}^{n}))^{i}\cong\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n})\xrightarrow{-\circ e_{0}}\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M)

is a weak homotopy equivalence.

The Kister–Mazur Theorem gives that the first of these maps is a homotopy equivalence. The problem is thus reduced to showing that the second of these maps is a weak homotopy equivalence. This is the problem of showing that each solid diagram among topological spaces

Skβˆ’1\textstyle{S^{k-1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f0\scriptstyle{f_{0}}𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,βŠ”i​ℝn)\textstyle{\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝔻k\textstyle{\mathbb{D}^{k}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}f~\scriptstyle{\widetilde{f}}𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)\textstyle{\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M)}

admits a filler with respect to which the diagram commutes up to homotopy. Choose a continuous map Ο•:(0,1]×ℝn→ℝn\phi\colon(0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} such that Ο•t\phi_{t} is an origin preserving open embedding for each tt, Ο•1=𝗂𝖽ℝn\phi_{1}={\sf id}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}, the closure Ο•s​(ℝn)Β―βŠ‚Ο•t​(ℝn)\overline{\phi_{s}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}\subset\phi_{t}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) whenever s<ts<t, and the collection of images {Ο•t​(ℝn)∣0<t≀1}\{\phi_{t}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\mid 0<t\leq 1\} is a basis for the topology about 0βˆˆβ„n0\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Choose a continuous map 𝔻kβ†’Ο΅(0,1]\mathbb{D}^{k}\xrightarrow{\epsilon}(0,1] for which the restriction Ο΅|Skβˆ’1≑1\epsilon_{|S^{k-1}}\equiv 1 is identically one, and the composition

𝔻k→𝑓𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)β†’(βŠ”i​ϕϡ)βˆ—π–€π—†π–»0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)\mathbb{D}^{k}\xrightarrow{~f~}\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M)\xrightarrow{~(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\phi_{\epsilon})^{\ast}~}\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M)

factors through 𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,βŠ”i​ℝn)\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n}). Define f~\widetilde{f} to be this factorization. By construction, the restriction f~|Skβˆ’1=f0\widetilde{f}_{|S^{k-1}}=f_{0}. The map [0,1]×𝔻k→𝖀𝗆𝖻0⁑(βŠ”i​ℝn,M)[0,1]\times\mathbb{D}^{k}\to\Emb_{0}(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\mathbb{R}^{n},M) given by (t,p)↦f∘(βŠ”π‘–β€‹Ο•t​ϡ+(1βˆ’t))βˆ—β€‹(p)(t,p)\mapsto f\circ(\underset{i}{\sqcup}\phi_{t\epsilon+(1-t)})^{\ast}(p) demonstrates a homotopy making the lower triangle commute.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6