ScalingStacks

[05WX]

Proof. First, we show that YredY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} is in fact reduced. Applying LL to the defining diagram of YredY^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} and using the fact that LL preserves pullbacks, we see that the map L⁡(Yred)→L​R​(∅)L\left(Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\to LR\left(\varnothing\right) is the pullback of the map L⁡(Y)→L​R​L​(Y)L\left(Y\right)\to LRL\left(Y\right), which is an equivalence (from the fact that the counit L​R​(Y)→YLR\left(Y\right)\to Y is an equivalence, the zig-zag identities and the 2-out-of-3 property). It follows that the map L⁡(Yred)→L​R​(∅)L\left(Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\to LR\left(\varnothing\right) is an equivalence, but L​R​(∅)→∅LR\left(\varnothing\right)\to\varnothing is an equivalence as well (since RR is fully faithful) and we are done.

Now, we show that ρ\rho is a co-localization. Let ZZ be a reduced object. We have a homotopy pullback diagram of spaces

Map⁡(Z,Yred)\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,Y^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁡(Z,Y)\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,Y\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁡(Z,R⁡(∅))\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,R\left(\varnothing\right)\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Map⁡(Z,R​L​(Y))\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}\left(Z,RL\left(Y\right)\right)}

and we note that the space of maps from a reduced object to any object in the essential image of RR is contractible. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

    Original source page 10

    Original source · 1808.06006v3