ScalingStacks

[05ZB]

Proposition 5.1.3. Let π’ž\mathcal{C} be an mm-topos for some βˆ’1≀mβ‰€βˆž-1\leq m\leq\infty with the Cartesian symmetric monoidal structure and let 𝒫\mathcal{P} be a reduced dd-connected ∞\infty-operad for some dβ‰₯βˆ’2d\geq-2. For every pair of algebras A,B∈Alg𝒫⁑(π’ž)A,B\in\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right), the canonical map

fA,B:AβŠ”Bβ†’AΓ—Bf_{A,B}\colon A\sqcup B\to A\times B

is dd-connected.

[05ZC]

Proof. For d=βˆ’2d=-2 there is nothing to prove and so we assume that dβ‰₯βˆ’1d\geq-1. By 4.4.5, it is enough to show that fA,BΒ―\underline{f_{A,B}} is dd-connected where (βˆ’)Β―:Alg𝒫⁑(π’ž)β†’π’ž\underline{\left(-\right)}\colon\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\to\mathcal{C} is the forgetful functor. By 4.3.5, it is enough to show that fA,BΒ―\underline{f_{A,B}} has a section and is (dβˆ’12)\left(d-\frac{1}{2}\right)-connected. Since dβ‰₯βˆ’1d\geq-1, we have 𝒫≠𝔼0\mathcal{P}\neq\mathbb{E}_{0} and, therefore, by 5.1.1, fA,BΒ―\underline{f_{A,B}} has a section. Thus, we are reduced to showing that the image of fA,BΒ―\underline{f_{A,B}} under the functor τ≀dπ’ž:π’žβ†’Ο„β‰€dβ€‹π’ž\tau_{\leq d}^{\mathcal{C}}\colon\mathcal{C}\to\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C} is an equivalence. First, we show that τ≀dπ’ž\tau_{\leq d}^{\mathcal{C}} preserves binary products. For m=∞m=\infty, this follows from T.6.5.1.2. The general case reduces to m=∞m=\infty as by T.6.4.1.5 we can embed π’ž\mathcal{C} as a full subcategory of an ∞\infty-topos spanned by the (mβˆ’1)\left(m-1\right)-truncated objects. It follows that we get a symmetric monoidal functor τ≀dΓ—:π’žΓ—β†’(τ≀dβ€‹π’ž)Γ—\tau_{\leq d}^{\times}\colon\mathcal{C}^{\times}\to\left(\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}\right)^{\times}. By 5.1.2, the functor

F:Alg𝒫⁑(π’ž)β†’Alg𝒫⁑(τ≀dβ€‹π’ž)F\colon\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\to\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}\right)

induced by τ≀nΓ—\tau_{\leq n}^{\times} is a left adjoint. Consider the following (solid) commutative diagram in the homotopy category of π‚πšπ­βˆž\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}:

Alg𝒫⁑(π’ž)\textstyle{\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F\scriptstyle{F}Alg𝒫⁑(τ≀dβ€‹π’ž)\textstyle{\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Gβ€²\scriptstyle{G^{\prime}}Algπ”Όβˆžβ‘(τ≀dβ€‹π’ž)\textstyle{\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}}\left(\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G\scriptstyle{G}π’ž\textstyle{\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}τ≀dπ’ž\scriptstyle{\tau_{\leq d}^{\mathcal{C}}}τ≀dβ€‹π’ž\textstyle{\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}}τ≀dβ€‹π’ž,\textstyle{\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C},\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}

where the vertical maps are the forgetful functors and GG is induced by restriction along the essentially unique map π’«β†’π”Όβˆž\mathcal{P}\to\mathbb{E}_{\infty}. Since τ≀dβ€‹π’ž\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C} is an essentially (d+1)\left(d+1\right)-category, it follows from 3.1.8 that GG is an equivalence. Taking Gβ€²G^{\prime} to be an inverse of GG up to homotopy, the outer rectangle is a commutative square in the homotopy category of π‚πšπ­βˆž\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty}. Therefore, to show that τ≀dπ’žβ€‹(fA,BΒ―)\tau_{\leq d}^{\mathcal{C}}\left(\underline{f_{A,B}}\right) is an equivalence, it is enough to show that G′​(F⁑(fA,B))Β―\underline{G^{\prime}\left(F\left(f_{A,B}\right)\right)} is an equivalence. In fact, we shall show that G′​(F⁑(fA,B))G^{\prime}\left(F\left(f_{A,B}\right)\right) is an equivalence. Note that the composition of the left and then bottom functors preserves binary products and since the right vertical functor preserves products and is conservative, it follows that the top functor Gβ€²βˆ˜FG^{\prime}\circ F also preserves binary products. On the other hand, Gβ€²βˆ˜FG^{\prime}\circ F also preserves coproducts, since FF is left adjoint (by the above discussion) and GG is an equivalence. Finally, in Algπ”Όβˆžβ‘(τ≀dβ€‹π’ž)\operatorname{Alg}_{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}}\left(\tau_{\leq d}\mathcal{C}\right), the canonical map from the coproduct to the product is an equivalence by A.3.2.4.7. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source page 36

Original source Β· 1808.06006v3