ScalingStacks

[05YX]

Proof. We first prove the case of m=∞m=\infty. For n=−2n=-2, there is nothing to prove, and so we assume that n≥−1n\geq-1. Since f∘s=IdBf\circ s=\operatorname{Id}_{B} we get τ≤n𝒞​(f)∘τ≤n𝒞​(s)=IdB\tau_{\leq n}^{\mathcal{C}}\left(f\right)\circ\tau_{\leq n}^{\mathcal{C}}\left(s\right)=\operatorname{Id}_{B} and since τ≤n​(f)\tau_{\leq n}\left(f\right) is an equivalence, then so is τ≤n​(s)\tau_{\leq n}\left(s\right) and hence ss is (n−12)\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)-connected. By 4.3.4, ss is (n−1)\left(n-1\right)-connected and hence, by T.6.5.1.20, the map ff is nn-connected (note that nn-connective means (n−1)\left(n-1\right)-connected).

For a general mm, by T.6.4.1.5 there exists an ∞\infty-topos 𝒟\mathcal{D} and an equivalence 𝒞≃τ≤m−1​𝒟\mathcal{C}\simeq\tau_{\leq m-1}\mathcal{D}, and so we may identify 𝒞\mathcal{C} with the full subcategory of (m−1)\left(m-1\right)-truncated objects of 𝒟\mathcal{D}. If f:A→Bf\colon A\to B is (n−12)\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)-connected in 𝒞\mathcal{C}, then it is also (n−12)\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)-connected in 𝒟\mathcal{D}, since the restriction of τ≤n𝒟\tau_{\leq n}^{\mathcal{D}} to 𝒞\mathcal{C} is equivalent to τ≤n𝒞\tau_{\leq n}^{\mathcal{C}}. It follows from the case of m=∞m=\infty that ff is nn-connected in 𝒟\mathcal{D}. Since f=τ≤m−1𝒟​ff=\tau_{\leq m-1}^{\mathcal{D}}f and τ≤m−1𝒟\tau_{\leq m-1}^{\mathcal{D}} is a left adjoint functor, by 4.2.5 the map ff is also nn-connected as a map in 𝒞\mathcal{C}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

    Original source page 32

    Original source · 1808.06006v3