[05YX]
Proof. We first prove the case of . For , there is nothing
to prove, and so we assume that . Since we get
and since is an equivalence, then so
is and hence is -connected.
By 4.3.4, is -connected
and hence, by T.6.5.1.20, the map is -connected (note that
-connective means -connected).
For a general , by T.6.4.1.5 there exists an -topos
and an equivalence , and so
we may identify with the full subcategory of -truncated
objects of . If is -connected
in , then it is also -connected
in , since the restriction of
to is equivalent to .
It follows from the case of that
is -connected in . Since and is a left adjoint functor, by
4.2.5 the map is also -connected
as a map in .
∎