ScalingStacks

5.2. Markov moves

Let (W,S)(W,S) be a finite Coxeter group. Let P​−exactP\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits be the category of finitely generated graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules whose restrictions to PP and PoppP^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} are projective. Let M∈Hob⁡(P​−exact)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits) and i∈𝐙i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. We put

Ki​(M)=KSi​(M)=Hd2i​(P⊗PenCPen​(M))∈Hob⁡(P​−modgr).K^{i}(M)=K^{i}_{S}(M)=H^{i}_{d_{2}}\bigl(P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

This defines a triangulated functor

Ki:Hob⁡(P​−exact)→Hob⁡(P​−modgr).K^{i}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).
0P27

Theorem 5.1. Given N,N′∈Hob⁡(P​−exact)N,N^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits), we have functorial isomorphisms Ki​(N⊗PN′)≃Ki​(N′⊗PN)K^{i}(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\simeq K^{i}(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P}N) in Ho⁡(P​−modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

Let s∈Ss\in S and let zsz_{s} be a non-zero element of (V∗)S∖s(V^{*})^{S\setminus s}. Let M∈Hob⁡(PS∖s​−exact)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P_{S\setminus s}\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits). We have functorial isomorphisms

  • •

    KSi​(γS∖s​(M)⊗PFs)≃ρS∖s∗​KS∖si+1​(M)​[−1]​ in ​D​(P​−modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M)\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}K^{i+1}_{S\setminus s}(M)[-1]\text{ in }D(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)

  • •

    KSi​(γS∖s​(M)⊗PFs−1)≃ρS∖s∗​KS∖si​(M)​ in ​D​(P​−modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M)\otimes_{P}F_{s}^{-1}\bigr)\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}K^{i}_{S\setminus s}(M)\text{ in }D(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)

  • •

    KSi​(γS∖s​(M))≃P⊗PS∖sKS∖si+1​(M)​⟨−1⟩⊕P⊗PS∖sKS∖si​(M)​ in ​Ho⁡(P​−modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M))\simeq P\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}}K^{i+1}_{S\setminus s}(M)\langle-1\rangle\oplus P\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}}K^{i}_{S\setminus s}(M)\text{ in }\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

0P28

Proof. Thanks to (2), we have

CPen​(Tot⁡(N⊗PN′))≃Tot12→1,3→2⁡(CPen​(N)⊗PN′)C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\bigr)\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})

hence

P⊗PenCPen​(Tot⁡(N⊗PN′))\displaystyle P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\bigr) ≃Tot12→1,3→2⁡(CPen​(N)⊗PenN′)\displaystyle\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}\bigl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}N^{\prime}\bigr)
≃Tot12→1,3→2⁡(N′⊗PenCPen​(N))\displaystyle\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}\bigl(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\bigr)
≃P⊗PenCPen​(Tot⁡(N′⊗PN))\displaystyle\simeq P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P}N)\bigr)

and the first assertion follows.

We have

CPen​(M⊗k⁡[zs])≃Tot1→1,23→2⁡(CPS∖sen​(M)⊗X)C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M\otimes k[z_{s}])\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{1\to 1,23\to 2}\bigl(C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\otimes X\bigr)

where X=0→k​[zs]en​⟨−1⟩→zs⊗1−1⊗zsk​[zs]en→0X=0\to k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}\langle-1\rangle\xrightarrow{z_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s}}k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}\to 0, the non-zero terms being in degrees −1-1 and 00. Let

L=P⊗Pen(CPen​(Tot⁡((M⊗k⁡[zs])⊗PFs))).L=P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\biggl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits\bigl((M\otimes k[z_{s}])\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\Bigr)\biggr).

By (2), we have

L≃P⊗PenTot13→1,2→2⁡(CPen​(M⊗k⁡[zs])⊗PFs)≃Tot13→1,24→2⁡((Fs⊗k​[zs]enX)⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M))L\simeq P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,2\to 2}\bigl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M\otimes k[z_{s}])\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl((F_{s}\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X)\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)

We have

Fs⊗k​[zs]enX≃    θs   P   θs​⟨1⟩   P​⟨1⟩    m          zs⊗1−1⊗zs          0          m          ≃    θs   P   θs​⟨1⟩   P​⟨1⟩    m          αs⊗1−1⊗αs          0          m          F_{s}\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\simeq\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 45.08356pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-7.48438pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.72223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise 27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-45.08356pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{z_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.25555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{0}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise-27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}\simeq\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 47.26572pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-7.48438pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.72223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise 27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-47.26572pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.25555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{0}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise-27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}

Indeed, there is c∈k∗c\in k^{*} such that s⁡(zs)−zs=−2​c​αss(z_{s})-z_{s}=-2c\alpha_{s}. Then zs−c​αs∈(V∗)sz_{s}-c\alpha_{s}\in(V^{*})^{s}, hence zs⊗1−1⊗zsz_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s} and c⁡(αs⊗1−1⊗αs)c(\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}) are equal in θs\theta_{s}.

Lemma 5.2 below shows that, when s∉Z⁡(W)s{\not\in}Z(W), then the exact sequence of PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0→P→αs⊗1+1⊗αsθs→a⊗b↦a​s​(b)P​s→00\to P\xrightarrow{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1+1\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}Ps\to 0

splits by restriction to PS∖senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}. Here, P​s=PPs=P as a left PP-module, and the right action of a∈Pa\in P is given by multiplication by s⁡(a)s(a). Note that when s∈Z⁡(W)s\in Z(W), then Ps=PS∖s⊗k⁡[αs2]P^{s}=P_{S\setminus s}\otimes k[\alpha_{s}^{2}], and the splitting of the sequence holds trivially.

We deduce that there is an isomorphism of complexes of graded PS∖senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

(0→θs→αs⊗1−1⊗αsθs​⟨1⟩→0)≃P⁡[1]​⟨−1⟩⊕(0→P​s→a↦a​αs⊗1−a⊗αsθs→0)​⟨1⟩.\bigl(0\to\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle\to 0\bigr)\simeq P[1]\langle-1\rangle\oplus\bigl(0\to Ps\xrightarrow{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\to 0\bigr)\langle 1\rangle.
Let ​Y1=    P​⟨−1⟩   P   0   0    2​αs                                and ​Y2=    P​s   0   θs​⟨1⟩   P​⟨1⟩           a↦a​αs⊗1−a⊗αs                        \text{Let }Y_{1}=\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 16.07117pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-16.07117pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle-1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-5.5pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 23.51813pt\raise 28.51764pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{2\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-16.53987pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-16.53987pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}\text{ and }Y_{2}=\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 56.29254pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-9.24826pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{Ps}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-56.29254pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}

We have an exact sequence of bicomplexes of graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0→Y1→Fs⊗k​[αs]enX→Y2→0.0\to Y_{1}\to F_{s}\otimes_{k[\alpha_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\to Y_{2}\to 0.

It splits after restricting to PS∖senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}} and applying ?(i,∗)?^{(i,*)}. It follows that we have an exact sequence of complexes of graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0→Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(Y1⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))→Hd2i​(L)→→Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(Y2⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))→0.0\to H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{1}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\to H^{i}_{d_{2}}(L)\to\\ \to H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\to 0.

We have an exact sequence of PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0→P​s→a↦a​αs⊗1−a⊗αsθs→𝑚P→0.0\to Ps\xrightarrow{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{m}P\to 0.

So, the morphism of bicomplexes Y2→Y2′Y_{2}\to Y^{\prime}_{2}:

P​s\textstyle{Ps\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}a↦a​αs⊗1−a⊗αs\scriptstyle{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}θs​⟨1⟩\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}m\scriptstyle{m}m\scriptstyle{m}P​⟨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}id\scriptstyle{\operatorname{id}\nolimits}P​⟨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}id\scriptstyle{\operatorname{id}\nolimits}P​⟨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}

induces an isomorphism of complexes

Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(Y2⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))→∼Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(Y2′⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y^{\prime}_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)

and these complexes vanish in Hob⁡(Pen​−modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

We deduce that

Hd2i​(L)\displaystyle H^{i}_{d_{2}}(L) ≃Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(Y1⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))\displaystyle\simeq H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{1}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)
≃ρS∖s∗​Hd2i​(Tot13→1,24→2⁡(PS∖s​[(−1,1)]⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M)))\displaystyle\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(P_{S\setminus s}[(-1,1)]\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)
≃ρS∖s∗​Hd2i+1​(PS∖s⊗PS∖senCPS∖sen​(M))​[−1]\displaystyle\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}H^{i+1}_{d_{2}}\bigl(P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)[-1]

in Db​(Pen​−modgr)D^{b}(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits). Note that the multiplication map Pen→PP^{\mathrm{en}}\to P is a split surjection of algebras. We deduce the first and last terms of the sequence of isomorphisms above are actually isomorphic in Db​(P​−modgr)D^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits). This shows the second assertion. The proof of the assertion involving Fs−1F_{s}^{-1} is similar.

We have k⁡[zs]⊗k​[zs]enX≃k⁡[zs]​⟨−1⟩​[1]⊕k⁡[zs]k[z_{s}]\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\simeq k[z_{s}]\langle-1\rangle[1]\oplus k[z_{s}] and the last assertion follows immediately. ∎

0P29

Lemma 5.2. Let s∈Ss\in S. Assume s∉Z⁡(W)s{\not\in}Z(W). Let L=(VS∖s)⟂∩(V∗)sL=(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}\cap(V^{*})^{s}, a hyperplane of (VS∖s)⟂=(VS∖s)∗(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}=(V_{S\setminus s})^{*}. We have a commutative diagram of PS∖senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}-modules where the diagonal map is an isomorphism

θs\textstyle{\theta_{s}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}a⊗b↦a​s​(b)\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}P​s\textstyle{Ps}PS∖s⊗S⁡(L)PS∖s\textstyle{P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{S(L)}P_{S\setminus s}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}a⊗b↦a⊗b\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto a\otimes b}a⊗b↦a​s​(b)\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}

Here, P​sPs denotes the left PS∖sP_{S\setminus s}-module PP endowed with a right action of a∈PS∖sa\in P_{S\setminus s} by multiplication by s⁡(a)s(a).

0P2A

Proof. We will show that ϕ:PS∖s⊗S⁡(L)PS∖s→P,a⊗b↦a​s​(b)\phi:P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{S(L)}P_{S\setminus s}\to P,\ a\otimes b\mapsto as(b) is an isomorphism. It is a morphism of algebras, and a morphism of graded left PS∖sP_{S\setminus s}-modules.

By assumption, there is t∈S∖st\in S\setminus s such that ms​t≠2m_{st}\not=2, so that s⁡(αt)−αts(\alpha_{t})-\alpha_{t} is a non-zero multiple of αs\alpha_{s}. It follows that ϕ⁡(αt⊗1−1⊗αt)∈k×​αs\phi(\alpha_{t}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{t})\in k^{\times}\alpha_{s}. Since V∗=(VS∖s)⟂⊕k​αsV^{*}=(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}\oplus k\alpha_{s}, we have P=PS∖s⊗k⁡[αs]P=P_{S\setminus s}\otimes k[\alpha_{s}] and we deduce that ϕ\phi is surjective.

Since ϕ\phi is a morphism of graded free left PS∖sP_{S\setminus s}-modules with the same graded ranks 1+t+t2+⋯1+t+t^{2}+\cdots, we deduce that ϕ\phi is an isomorphism. ∎

0P2B

Remark 5.3. While we do not expect the category of Soergel bimodules to exist for complex reflection groups, we hope that its homotopy category does exist, as well as the 22-braid group. This would be a starting point for a structural approach to the construction of unipotent data in Broué–Malle–Michel’s theory of spets [BroMaMi].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Raphaël Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1