ScalingStacks

4.1.1. Markov traces

Let π’žβ€‹o​x{\mathcal{C}}{ox} be the poset of finite Coxeter groups, viewed as a category. The objects are Coxeter groups (W,S)(W,S) and Hom⁑((W,S),(Wβ€²,Sβ€²))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits((W,S),(W^{\prime},S^{\prime})) is the set of injective maps f:Sβ†’Sβ€²f:S\to S^{\prime} such that mf⁑(s),f⁑(t)=ms​tm_{f(s),f(t)}=m_{st} for all s,t∈Ss,t\in S. Given s∈Ss\in S, we denote by is:(WSβˆ–s,Sβˆ–s)β†’(W,S)i_{s}:(W_{S\setminus s},S\setminus s)\to(W,S) the inclusion.

Let β„±{\mathcal{F}} be a full subposet of π’žβ€‹o​x{\mathcal{C}}{ox} closed below.

Let β„‹(W,S)=𝐙⁑[qΒ±1]​B(W,S)/((Tsβˆ’1)​(Ts+q))s∈S{\mathcal{H}}_{(W,S)}={\mathbf{Z}}[q^{\pm 1}]B_{(W,S)}/((T_{s}-1)(T_{s}+q))_{s\in S} be the Hecke algebra of (W,S)(W,S).

0P1W

Definition 4.1. Let RR be a 𝐙⁑[tβˆ’,t+,qΒ±1]{\mathbf{Z}}[t_{-},t_{+},q^{\pm 1}]-module. A Markov trace on β„±{\mathcal{F}} is the data of a family of 𝐙⁑[qΒ±1]{\mathbf{Z}}[q^{\pm 1}]-linear maps Ο„(W,S):β„‹(W,S)β†’R\tau_{(W,S)}:{\mathcal{H}}_{(W,S)}\to R for (W,S)βˆˆβ„±(W,S)\in{\mathcal{F}} such that

  • β€’

    Ο„S​(h​hβ€²)=Ο„S​(h′​h)\tau_{S}(hh^{\prime})=\tau_{S}(h^{\prime}h) for h,hβ€²βˆˆβ„‹Sh,h^{\prime}\in{\mathcal{H}}_{S}

  • β€’

    Ο„S​(h​TsΒ±1)=t±​τSβˆ–s​(h)\tau_{S}(hT_{s}^{\pm 1})=t_{\pm}\tau_{S\setminus s}(h) for all s∈Ss\in S and hβˆˆβ„‹Sβˆ–sh\in{\mathcal{H}}_{S\setminus s}.

Markov traces, with a possibly more general definition, have been studied by Jones and Ocneanu in type AA [Jo], Geck-Lambropoulou in type BB [GeLa], Geck in type DD [Ge], and Kihara in type I2​(n)I_{2}(n) [Ki]. Gomi has provided a general construction of Markov traces for Weyl groups, using Lusztig’s Fourier transform [Go]. More recently, Lasy has studied Markov traces in relation with Gomi’s definition and Soergel bimodules [La1].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

RaphaΓ«l Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1