ScalingStacks

5.1. Multiple complexes

5.1.1. Total objects

For a more intrinsic approach to this section, cf [De, Β§1.1].

Let π’œ{\mathcal{A}} be an additive category and nβ‰₯0n\geq 0. We denote by Comp⁑(π’œ)\operatorname{Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}) the category of complexes of objects of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. The category nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}) of nn-fold complexes is defined inductively by nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)=Comp⁑((nβˆ’1)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ))n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})=\operatorname{Comp}\nolimits((n-1)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})) and 0β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)=π’œ0\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})={\mathcal{A}}. Its objects are families (X,d1,…,dn)(X,d_{1},\ldots,d_{n}) where XX is an object of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} graded by 𝐙n=⨁i=1n𝐙​eiβˆ—{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{n}{\mathbf{Z}}e_{i}^{*}, did_{i} is a graded map of degree eie_{i} and di2=[di,dj]=0d_{i}^{2}=[d_{i},d_{j}]=0 for all i,ji,j.

Given XX an nn-complex and i∈{1,…,n}i\in\{1,\ldots,n\}, we define Y=X⁑[ei]Y=X[e_{i}] as the nn-complex given by Yb=Xei+bY^{b}=X^{e_{i}+b} and differentials βˆ‚ib=(βˆ’1)Ξ΄i​jdjei+b\partial_{i}^{b}=(-1)^{\delta_{ij}}d_{j}^{e_{i}+b}.

Let f:{1,…,n}β†’{1,…,m}f:\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,\ldots,m\} be a map. It induces a map Οƒ:𝐙n→𝐙m\sigma:{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{m} and gives by duality a map 𝐙m→𝐙n{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}. This provides a functor from 𝐙n{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}-graded objects to 𝐙m{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}-graded objects of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. Let XX be an nn-complex. We have a corresponding 𝐙m{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}-graded object Xβ€²X^{\prime}. We define a structure of mm-complex by

diβ€²a=βˆ‘bβˆˆΟƒβˆ’1​(a)j∈fβˆ’1​(i)(βˆ’1)βˆ‘k∈fβˆ’1​(i),k<jbk​djbd_{i}^{\prime a}=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}b\in\sigma^{-1}(a)\\ j\in f^{-1}(i)\end{subarray}}(-1)^{\sum_{k\in f^{-1}(i),k<j}b_{k}}d_{j}^{b}

where b=βˆ‘ibi​eib=\sum_{i}b_{i}e_{i}.

Note that when ff is an injection, the sum above has only positive signs. When ff is a bijection, then Totf\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f} is a self-equivalence of nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). We write Tot=Totf\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits=\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f} when m=1m=1.

We have defined an additive functor

Totf:nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)β†’mβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ).\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}:n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})\to m\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}).

Let g:{1,…,m}β†’{1,…,p}g:\{1,\ldots,m\}\to\{1,\ldots,p\} be a map and Ο„:𝐙m→𝐙p\tau:{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{p} the associated morphism. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). The 𝐙p{\mathbf{Z}}^{p}-graded objects underlying Totg​f⁑(X)\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{gf}(X) and Totg⁑(Totf⁑(X))\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{g}(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}(X)) have their component of degree aa equal to ⨁c∈(τ​σ)βˆ’1​(a)Xc\bigoplus_{c\in(\tau\sigma)^{-1}(a)}X^{c}. We define an isomorphism between these pp-complexes by multiplication by (βˆ’1)Ρ⁑(c)(-1)^{\varepsilon(c)} on XcX^{c}, where

Ρ⁑(c)=βˆ‘l<lβ€²f⁑(l)>f⁑(lβ€²)g​f​(l)=g​f​(lβ€²)cl​clβ€².\varepsilon(c)=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}l<l^{\prime}\\ f(l)>f(l^{\prime})\\ gf(l)=gf(l^{\prime})\end{subarray}}c_{l}c_{l^{\prime}}.

This gives an isomorphism of functors

Totg​fβ†’βˆΌTotg∘Totf.\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{gf}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{g}\circ\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}.

Let kk be a commutative ring and AA, BB and CC be three kk-algebras. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((AβŠ—B)β€‹βˆ’Mod)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((A\otimes B)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits) and Y∈mβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((BβŠ—C)β€‹βˆ’Mod)Y\in m\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((B\otimes C)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). Then XβŠ—BYX\otimes_{B}Y defines an object of (n+m)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((AβŠ—C)β€‹βˆ’Mod)(n+m)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((A\otimes C)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). We have (XβŠ—BY)(a1,…,an+m)=X(a1,…,an)βŠ—BY(an+1,…,an+m)(X\otimes_{B}Y)^{(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n+m})}=X^{(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n})}\otimes_{B}Y^{(a_{n+1},\ldots,a_{n+m})}.

5.1.2. Cohomology

Assume π’œ{\mathcal{A}} is an abelian category. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). Let r∈{1,…,n}r\in\{1,\ldots,n\} and Y=ker⁑dr/im⁑drY=\ker d_{r}/\operatorname{im}\nolimits d_{r}. This is an nn-complex with dr,Y=0d_{r,Y}=0. Let iβˆˆπ™i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. Consider the map f:𝐙nβˆ’1→𝐙n,(a1,…,anβˆ’1)↦(a1,…,arβˆ’1,i,ar,…,anβˆ’1)f:{\mathbf{Z}}^{n-1}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{n},\ (a_{1},\ldots,a_{n-1})\mapsto(a_{1},\ldots,a_{r-1},i,a_{r},\ldots,a_{n-1}). We put Hdri​(X)=⨁aβˆˆπ™nβˆ’1Yf⁑(a)H^{i}_{d_{r}}(X)=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}^{n-1}}Y^{f(a)}. This defines a functor

Hri:nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)β†’(nβˆ’1)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ).H^{i}_{r}:n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})\to(n-1)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}).

Let g:{1,…,n}β†’{1,…,m}g:\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,\ldots,m\} be a map and let r∈{1,…,m}r\in\{1,\ldots,m\} such that fβˆ’1​(r)={s}f^{-1}(r)=\{s\} for some s∈{1,…,n}s\in\{1,\ldots,n\}. Define maps

Ξ±:{1,…,nβˆ’1}β†’{1,…,n},i↦{iΒ if ​i<si+1Β if ​iβ‰₯s\alpha:\{1,\ldots,n-1\}\to\{1,\ldots,n\},\ i\mapsto\begin{cases}i&\text{ if }i<s\\ i+1&\text{ if }i\geq s\end{cases}

and

Ξ²:{1,…,m}β†’{1,…,mβˆ’1},i↦{iΒ if ​i<riβˆ’1Β if ​iβ‰₯r\beta:\{1,\ldots,m\}\to\{1,\ldots,m-1\},\ i\mapsto\begin{cases}i&\text{ if }i<r\\ i-1&\text{ if }i\geq r\end{cases}

Then, we have a canonical isomorphism

(1) Hdri​(Totf⁑(M))β†’βˆΌTotβ​f​α⁑(Hdsi​(M)).H^{i}_{d_{r}}(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}(M))\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{\beta f\alpha}(H^{i}_{d_{s}}(M)).

5.1.3. Resolutions

Let kk be a commutative ring and AA a kk-algebra. The kk-linear functor H0:Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Aβ€‹βˆ’ModH^{0}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits restricted to the full subcategory of complexes MM with Hi​(M)=0H^{i}(M)=0 for iβ‰ 0i\not=0 is an equivalence. Let C=CA:Aβ€‹βˆ’Modβ†’Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)C=C_{A}:A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits) be an inverse, composed with the inclusion functor. By construction the resolution functor CC is fully faithful. It induces a functor, still denoted by CC,

C:Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)β†’Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)).C:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr).

We view Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr) as a triangulated category with the canonical structure on Hob⁑(π’ž)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}({\mathcal{C}}), where π’ž{\mathcal{C}} is the additive category Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits). The functor CC is a fully faithful triangulated functor.

Assume AA is projective as a kk-module. Let X=CAen​(A)X=C_{A^{\mathrm{en}}}(A) be a projective resolution of AA as an AenA^{\mathrm{en}}-module. The functor

βˆ’βŠ—AoppX:Compb(Aβˆ’Mod)β†’2βˆ’Comp(Aβˆ’Proj)-\otimes_{A^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}X:\mathrm{Comp}^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to 2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)

composed with the canonical functor 2β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Ho⁑(Ho⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr) is isomorphic to CC: we have MβŠ—AoppXβ†’βˆΌCA​(M)M\otimes_{A^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}X\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{A}(M) for M∈Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

Let iβˆˆπ™i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. The functor Hi:Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Aβ€‹βˆ’ModH^{i}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits induces a functor

Hd2i:Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))β†’Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod).H^{i}_{d_{2}}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

It extends the functor Hd2i:2β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)β†’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)H^{i}_{d_{2}}:2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to\mathrm{Comp}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

Let B,Bβ€²B,B^{\prime} be two kk-algebras, projective as kk-modules. Let L∈Hob⁑((AβŠ—Bopp)β€‹βˆ’Mod)L\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl((A\otimes B^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits\bigr) and M∈Hob⁑((BβŠ—Bβ€²opp)β€‹βˆ’Mod)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}((B\otimes B^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}})\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). Assume the components of MM are projective right Bβ€²B^{\prime}-modules. We deduce from (1) an isomorphism

(2) Tot13β†’1,2β†’2⁑(CAβŠ—Bopp​(L)βŠ—BM)β†’βˆΌCAβŠ—Bβ€²opp​(Tot⁑(LβŠ—BM)).\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,2\to 2}\bigl(C_{A\otimes B^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}(L)\otimes_{B}M\bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{A\otimes B^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(L\otimes_{B}M)\bigr).

Note that when AA is coherent, then Aβ€‹βˆ’ModA\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits can be replaced by the abelian category Aβ€‹βˆ’modA\operatorname{\!-mod}\nolimits and Aβ€‹βˆ’ProjA\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits by Aβ€‹βˆ’projA\operatorname{\!-proj}\nolimits. If AA is graded, we can replace these categories by the corresponding categories of graded modules.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

RaphaΓ«l Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1