ScalingStacks

5. Proofs

5.1. Multiple complexes

5.1.1. Total objects

For a more intrinsic approach to this section, cf [De, Β§1.1].

Let π’œ{\mathcal{A}} be an additive category and nβ‰₯0n\geq 0. We denote by Comp⁑(π’œ)\operatorname{Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}) the category of complexes of objects of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. The category nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}) of nn-fold complexes is defined inductively by nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)=Comp⁑((nβˆ’1)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ))n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})=\operatorname{Comp}\nolimits((n-1)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})) and 0β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)=π’œ0\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})={\mathcal{A}}. Its objects are families (X,d1,…,dn)(X,d_{1},\ldots,d_{n}) where XX is an object of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} graded by 𝐙n=⨁i=1n𝐙​eiβˆ—{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{n}{\mathbf{Z}}e_{i}^{*}, did_{i} is a graded map of degree eie_{i} and di2=[di,dj]=0d_{i}^{2}=[d_{i},d_{j}]=0 for all i,ji,j.

Given XX an nn-complex and i∈{1,…,n}i\in\{1,\ldots,n\}, we define Y=X⁑[ei]Y=X[e_{i}] as the nn-complex given by Yb=Xei+bY^{b}=X^{e_{i}+b} and differentials βˆ‚ib=(βˆ’1)Ξ΄i​jdjei+b\partial_{i}^{b}=(-1)^{\delta_{ij}}d_{j}^{e_{i}+b}.

Let f:{1,…,n}β†’{1,…,m}f:\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,\ldots,m\} be a map. It induces a map Οƒ:𝐙n→𝐙m\sigma:{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{m} and gives by duality a map 𝐙m→𝐙n{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}. This provides a functor from 𝐙n{\mathbf{Z}}^{n}-graded objects to 𝐙m{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}-graded objects of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. Let XX be an nn-complex. We have a corresponding 𝐙m{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}-graded object Xβ€²X^{\prime}. We define a structure of mm-complex by

diβ€²a=βˆ‘bβˆˆΟƒβˆ’1​(a)j∈fβˆ’1​(i)(βˆ’1)βˆ‘k∈fβˆ’1​(i),k<jbk​djbd_{i}^{\prime a}=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}b\in\sigma^{-1}(a)\\ j\in f^{-1}(i)\end{subarray}}(-1)^{\sum_{k\in f^{-1}(i),k<j}b_{k}}d_{j}^{b}

where b=βˆ‘ibi​eib=\sum_{i}b_{i}e_{i}.

Note that when ff is an injection, the sum above has only positive signs. When ff is a bijection, then Totf\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f} is a self-equivalence of nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). We write Tot=Totf\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits=\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f} when m=1m=1.

We have defined an additive functor

Totf:nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)β†’mβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ).\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}:n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})\to m\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}).

Let g:{1,…,m}β†’{1,…,p}g:\{1,\ldots,m\}\to\{1,\ldots,p\} be a map and Ο„:𝐙m→𝐙p\tau:{\mathbf{Z}}^{m}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{p} the associated morphism. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). The 𝐙p{\mathbf{Z}}^{p}-graded objects underlying Totg​f⁑(X)\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{gf}(X) and Totg⁑(Totf⁑(X))\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{g}(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}(X)) have their component of degree aa equal to ⨁c∈(τ​σ)βˆ’1​(a)Xc\bigoplus_{c\in(\tau\sigma)^{-1}(a)}X^{c}. We define an isomorphism between these pp-complexes by multiplication by (βˆ’1)Ρ⁑(c)(-1)^{\varepsilon(c)} on XcX^{c}, where

Ρ⁑(c)=βˆ‘l<lβ€²f⁑(l)>f⁑(lβ€²)g​f​(l)=g​f​(lβ€²)cl​clβ€².\varepsilon(c)=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}l<l^{\prime}\\ f(l)>f(l^{\prime})\\ gf(l)=gf(l^{\prime})\end{subarray}}c_{l}c_{l^{\prime}}.

This gives an isomorphism of functors

Totg​fβ†’βˆΌTotg∘Totf.\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{gf}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{g}\circ\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}.

Let kk be a commutative ring and AA, BB and CC be three kk-algebras. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((AβŠ—B)β€‹βˆ’Mod)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((A\otimes B)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits) and Y∈mβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((BβŠ—C)β€‹βˆ’Mod)Y\in m\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((B\otimes C)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). Then XβŠ—BYX\otimes_{B}Y defines an object of (n+m)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑((AβŠ—C)β€‹βˆ’Mod)(n+m)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits((A\otimes C)\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). We have (XβŠ—BY)(a1,…,an+m)=X(a1,…,an)βŠ—BY(an+1,…,an+m)(X\otimes_{B}Y)^{(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n+m})}=X^{(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n})}\otimes_{B}Y^{(a_{n+1},\ldots,a_{n+m})}.

5.1.2. Cohomology

Assume π’œ{\mathcal{A}} is an abelian category. Let X∈nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)X\in n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}). Let r∈{1,…,n}r\in\{1,\ldots,n\} and Y=ker⁑dr/im⁑drY=\ker d_{r}/\operatorname{im}\nolimits d_{r}. This is an nn-complex with dr,Y=0d_{r,Y}=0. Let iβˆˆπ™i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. Consider the map f:𝐙nβˆ’1→𝐙n,(a1,…,anβˆ’1)↦(a1,…,arβˆ’1,i,ar,…,anβˆ’1)f:{\mathbf{Z}}^{n-1}\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{n},\ (a_{1},\ldots,a_{n-1})\mapsto(a_{1},\ldots,a_{r-1},i,a_{r},\ldots,a_{n-1}). We put Hdri​(X)=⨁aβˆˆπ™nβˆ’1Yf⁑(a)H^{i}_{d_{r}}(X)=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}^{n-1}}Y^{f(a)}. This defines a functor

Hri:nβ€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ)β†’(nβˆ’1)β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(π’œ).H^{i}_{r}:n\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}})\to(n-1)\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits({\mathcal{A}}).

Let g:{1,…,n}β†’{1,…,m}g:\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,\ldots,m\} be a map and let r∈{1,…,m}r\in\{1,\ldots,m\} such that fβˆ’1​(r)={s}f^{-1}(r)=\{s\} for some s∈{1,…,n}s\in\{1,\ldots,n\}. Define maps

Ξ±:{1,…,nβˆ’1}β†’{1,…,n},i↦{iΒ if ​i<si+1Β if ​iβ‰₯s\alpha:\{1,\ldots,n-1\}\to\{1,\ldots,n\},\ i\mapsto\begin{cases}i&\text{ if }i<s\\ i+1&\text{ if }i\geq s\end{cases}

and

Ξ²:{1,…,m}β†’{1,…,mβˆ’1},i↦{iΒ if ​i<riβˆ’1Β if ​iβ‰₯r\beta:\{1,\ldots,m\}\to\{1,\ldots,m-1\},\ i\mapsto\begin{cases}i&\text{ if }i<r\\ i-1&\text{ if }i\geq r\end{cases}

Then, we have a canonical isomorphism

(1) Hdri​(Totf⁑(M))β†’βˆΌTotβ​f​α⁑(Hdsi​(M)).H^{i}_{d_{r}}(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{f}(M))\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{\beta f\alpha}(H^{i}_{d_{s}}(M)).

5.1.3. Resolutions

Let kk be a commutative ring and AA a kk-algebra. The kk-linear functor H0:Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Aβ€‹βˆ’ModH^{0}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits restricted to the full subcategory of complexes MM with Hi​(M)=0H^{i}(M)=0 for iβ‰ 0i\not=0 is an equivalence. Let C=CA:Aβ€‹βˆ’Modβ†’Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)C=C_{A}:A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits) be an inverse, composed with the inclusion functor. By construction the resolution functor CC is fully faithful. It induces a functor, still denoted by CC,

C:Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)β†’Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)).C:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr).

We view Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr) as a triangulated category with the canonical structure on Hob⁑(π’ž)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}({\mathcal{C}}), where π’ž{\mathcal{C}} is the additive category Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits). The functor CC is a fully faithful triangulated functor.

Assume AA is projective as a kk-module. Let X=CAen​(A)X=C_{A^{\mathrm{en}}}(A) be a projective resolution of AA as an AenA^{\mathrm{en}}-module. The functor

βˆ’βŠ—AoppX:Compb(Aβˆ’Mod)β†’2βˆ’Comp(Aβˆ’Proj)-\otimes_{A^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}X:\mathrm{Comp}^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to 2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)

composed with the canonical functor 2β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Ho⁑(Ho⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr) is isomorphic to CC: we have MβŠ—AoppXβ†’βˆΌCA​(M)M\otimes_{A^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}X\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{A}(M) for M∈Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

Let iβˆˆπ™i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. The functor Hi:Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj)β†’Aβ€‹βˆ’ModH^{i}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits induces a functor

Hd2i:Hob⁑(Hoβˆ’β‘(Aβ€‹βˆ’Proj))β†’Hob⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod).H^{i}_{d_{2}}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl(\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{-}(A\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits)\bigr)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

It extends the functor Hd2i:2β€‹βˆ’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)β†’Comp⁑(Aβ€‹βˆ’Mod)H^{i}_{d_{2}}:2\operatorname{\!-Comp}\nolimits(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits)\to\mathrm{Comp}(A\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits).

Let B,Bβ€²B,B^{\prime} be two kk-algebras, projective as kk-modules. Let L∈Hob⁑((AβŠ—Bopp)β€‹βˆ’Mod)L\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}\bigl((A\otimes B^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits\bigr) and M∈Hob⁑((BβŠ—Bβ€²opp)β€‹βˆ’Mod)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}((B\otimes B^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}})\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits). Assume the components of MM are projective right Bβ€²B^{\prime}-modules. We deduce from (1) an isomorphism

(2) Tot13β†’1,2β†’2⁑(CAβŠ—Bopp​(L)βŠ—BM)β†’βˆΌCAβŠ—Bβ€²opp​(Tot⁑(LβŠ—BM)).\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,2\to 2}\bigl(C_{A\otimes B^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}(L)\otimes_{B}M\bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{A\otimes B^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(L\otimes_{B}M)\bigr).

Note that when AA is coherent, then Aβ€‹βˆ’ModA\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits can be replaced by the abelian category Aβ€‹βˆ’modA\operatorname{\!-mod}\nolimits and Aβ€‹βˆ’ProjA\operatorname{\!-Proj}\nolimits by Aβ€‹βˆ’projA\operatorname{\!-proj}\nolimits. If AA is graded, we can replace these categories by the corresponding categories of graded modules.

5.2. Markov moves

Let (W,S)(W,S) be a finite Coxeter group. Let Pβ€‹βˆ’exactP\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits be the category of finitely generated graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules whose restrictions to PP and PoppP^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} are projective. Let M∈Hob⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’exact)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits) and iβˆˆπ™i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. We put

Ki​(M)=KSi​(M)=Hd2i​(PβŠ—PenCPen​(M))∈Hob⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr).K^{i}(M)=K^{i}_{S}(M)=H^{i}_{d_{2}}\bigl(P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

This defines a triangulated functor

Ki:Hob⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’exact)β†’Hob⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr).K^{i}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).
0P27

Theorem 5.1. Given N,Nβ€²βˆˆHob⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’exact)N,N^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits), we have functorial isomorphisms Ki​(NβŠ—PNβ€²)≃Ki​(Nβ€²βŠ—PN)K^{i}(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\simeq K^{i}(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P}N) in Ho⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

Let s∈Ss\in S and let zsz_{s} be a non-zero element of (Vβˆ—)Sβˆ–s(V^{*})^{S\setminus s}. Let M∈Hob⁑(PSβˆ–sβ€‹βˆ’exact)M\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P_{S\setminus s}\operatorname{\!-exact}\nolimits). We have functorial isomorphisms

  • β€’

    KSi​(Ξ³Sβˆ–s​(M)βŠ—PFs)≃ρSβˆ–sβˆ—β€‹KSβˆ–si+1​(M)​[βˆ’1]​ in ​D​(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M)\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}K^{i+1}_{S\setminus s}(M)[-1]\text{ in }D(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)

  • β€’

    KSi​(Ξ³Sβˆ–s​(M)βŠ—PFsβˆ’1)≃ρSβˆ–sβˆ—β€‹KSβˆ–si​(M)​ in ​D​(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M)\otimes_{P}F_{s}^{-1}\bigr)\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}K^{i}_{S\setminus s}(M)\text{ in }D(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)

  • β€’

    KSi​(Ξ³Sβˆ–s​(M))≃PβŠ—PSβˆ–sKSβˆ–si+1​(M)β€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1βŸ©βŠ•PβŠ—PSβˆ–sKSβˆ–si​(M)​ in ​Ho⁑(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr)K^{i}_{S}\bigl(\gamma_{S\setminus s}(M))\simeq P\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}}K^{i+1}_{S\setminus s}(M)\langle-1\rangle\oplus P\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}}K^{i}_{S\setminus s}(M)\text{ in }\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

0P28

Proof. Thanks to (2), we have

CPen​(Tot⁑(NβŠ—PNβ€²))≃Tot12β†’1,3β†’2⁑(CPen​(N)βŠ—PNβ€²)C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\bigr)\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})

hence

PβŠ—PenCPen​(Tot⁑(NβŠ—PNβ€²))\displaystyle P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N\otimes_{P}N^{\prime})\bigr) ≃Tot12β†’1,3β†’2⁑(CPen​(N)βŠ—PenNβ€²)\displaystyle\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}\bigl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}N^{\prime}\bigr)
≃Tot12β†’1,3β†’2⁑(Nβ€²βŠ—PenCPen​(N))\displaystyle\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{12\to 1,3\to 2}\bigl(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(N)\bigr)
≃PβŠ—PenCPen​(Tot⁑(Nβ€²βŠ—PN))\displaystyle\simeq P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits(N^{\prime}\otimes_{P}N)\bigr)

and the first assertion follows.

We have

CPen​(MβŠ—k⁑[zs])≃Tot1β†’1,23β†’2⁑(CPSβˆ–sen​(M)βŠ—X)C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M\otimes k[z_{s}])\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{1\to 1,23\to 2}\bigl(C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\otimes X\bigr)

where X=0β†’k​[zs]enβ€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1βŸ©β†’zsβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—zsk​[zs]enβ†’0X=0\to k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}\langle-1\rangle\xrightarrow{z_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s}}k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}\to 0, the non-zero terms being in degrees βˆ’1-1 and 00. Let

L=PβŠ—Pen(CPen​(Tot⁑((MβŠ—k⁑[zs])βŠ—PFs))).L=P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\biggl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits\bigl((M\otimes k[z_{s}])\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\Bigr)\biggr).

By (2), we have

L≃PβŠ—PenTot13β†’1,2β†’2⁑(CPen​(MβŠ—k⁑[zs])βŠ—PFs)≃Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑((FsβŠ—k​[zs]enX)βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M))L\simeq P\otimes_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,2\to 2}\bigl(C_{P^{\mathrm{en}}}(M\otimes k[z_{s}])\otimes_{P}F_{s}\bigr)\simeq\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl((F_{s}\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X)\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)

We have

FsβŠ—k​[zs]enX≃    θsΒ Β Β PΒ Β Β ΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩   Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩    mΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β zsβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—zsΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 0Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β m          ≃    θsΒ Β Β PΒ Β Β ΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩   Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩    mΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Ξ±sβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—Ξ±sΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 0Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β mΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β F_{s}\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\simeq\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 45.08356pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-7.48438pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.72223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise 27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-45.08356pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{z_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.25555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{0}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise-27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}\simeq\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 47.26572pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-7.48438pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.72223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise 27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-47.26572pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.25555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{0}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.19449pt\raise-27.26903pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{m}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}

Indeed, there is c∈kβˆ—c\in k^{*} such that s⁑(zs)βˆ’zs=βˆ’2​c​αss(z_{s})-z_{s}=-2c\alpha_{s}. Then zsβˆ’c​αs∈(Vβˆ—)sz_{s}-c\alpha_{s}\in(V^{*})^{s}, hence zsβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—zsz_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes z_{s} and c⁑(Ξ±sβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—Ξ±s)c(\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}) are equal in ΞΈs\theta_{s}.

Lemma 5.2 below shows that, when sβˆ‰Z⁑(W)s{\not\in}Z(W), then the exact sequence of PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0β†’Pβ†’Ξ±sβŠ—1+1βŠ—Ξ±sΞΈsβ†’aβŠ—b↦a​s​(b)P​sβ†’00\to P\xrightarrow{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1+1\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}Ps\to 0

splits by restriction to PSβˆ–senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}. Here, P​s=PPs=P as a left PP-module, and the right action of a∈Pa\in P is given by multiplication by s⁑(a)s(a). Note that when s∈Z⁑(W)s\in Z(W), then Ps=PSβˆ–sβŠ—k⁑[Ξ±s2]P^{s}=P_{S\setminus s}\otimes k[\alpha_{s}^{2}], and the splitting of the sequence holds trivially.

We deduce that there is an isomorphism of complexes of graded PSβˆ–senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

(0β†’ΞΈsβ†’Ξ±sβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—Ξ±sΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1βŸ©β†’0)≃P⁑[1]β€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1βŸ©βŠ•(0β†’P​sβ†’a↦a​αsβŠ—1βˆ’aβŠ—Ξ±sΞΈsβ†’0)β€‹βŸ¨1⟩.\bigl(0\to\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle\to 0\bigr)\simeq P[1]\langle-1\rangle\oplus\bigl(0\to Ps\xrightarrow{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\to 0\bigr)\langle 1\rangle.
Let ​Y1=Β Β Β Β Pβ€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1⟩   PΒ Β Β 0Β Β Β 0Β Β Β Β 2​αsΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β and ​Y2=Β Β Β Β P​sΒ Β Β 0Β Β Β ΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩   Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩           a↦a​αsβŠ—1βˆ’aβŠ—Ξ±sΒ Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β \text{Let }Y_{1}=\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 16.07117pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-16.07117pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle-1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-5.5pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 23.51813pt\raise 28.51764pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{2\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 50.0007pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-16.53987pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-16.53987pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}\text{ and }Y_{2}=\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 56.29254pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-9.24826pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.41666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{Ps}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-3.22223pt\hbox{$\textstyle{0}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-13.87329pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}$}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 51.40521pt\raise 22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-56.29254pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.75555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise-14.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 43.61179pt\raise-22.76208pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces}}}}

We have an exact sequence of bicomplexes of graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0β†’Y1β†’FsβŠ—k​[Ξ±s]enXβ†’Y2β†’0.0\to Y_{1}\to F_{s}\otimes_{k[\alpha_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\to Y_{2}\to 0.

It splits after restricting to PSβˆ–senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}} and applying ?(i,βˆ—)?^{(i,*)}. It follows that we have an exact sequence of complexes of graded PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0β†’Hd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(Y1βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))β†’Hd2i​(L)β†’β†’Hd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(Y2βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))β†’0.0\to H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{1}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\to H^{i}_{d_{2}}(L)\to\\ \to H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\to 0.

We have an exact sequence of PenP^{\mathrm{en}}-modules

0β†’P​sβ†’a↦a​αsβŠ—1βˆ’aβŠ—Ξ±sΞΈsβ†’π‘šPβ†’0.0\to Ps\xrightarrow{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\xrightarrow{m}P\to 0.

So, the morphism of bicomplexes Y2β†’Y2β€²Y_{2}\to Y^{\prime}_{2}:

P​s\textstyle{Ps\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}a↦a​αsβŠ—1βˆ’aβŠ—Ξ±s\scriptstyle{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1-a\otimes\alpha_{s}}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}0\textstyle{0\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩\textstyle{\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}m\scriptstyle{m}m\scriptstyle{m}Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}id\scriptstyle{\operatorname{id}\nolimits}Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}id\scriptstyle{\operatorname{id}\nolimits}Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩\textstyle{P\langle 1\rangle}

induces an isomorphism of complexes

Hd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(Y2βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))β†’βˆΌHd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(Y2β€²βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y^{\prime}_{2}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)

and these complexes vanish in Hob⁑(Penβ€‹βˆ’modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

We deduce that

Hd2i​(L)\displaystyle H^{i}_{d_{2}}(L) ≃Hd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(Y1βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))\displaystyle\simeq H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(Y_{1}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)
≃ρSβˆ–sβˆ—β€‹Hd2i​(Tot13β†’1,24β†’2⁑(PSβˆ–s​[(βˆ’1,1)]βŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M)))\displaystyle\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}H^{i}_{d_{2}}\Bigl(\operatorname{Tot}\nolimits^{13\to 1,24\to 2}\bigl(P_{S\setminus s}[(-1,1)]\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)\Bigr)
≃ρSβˆ–sβˆ—β€‹Hd2i+1​(PSβˆ–sβŠ—PSβˆ–senCPSβˆ–sen​(M))​[βˆ’1]\displaystyle\simeq\rho_{S\setminus s}^{*}H^{i+1}_{d_{2}}\bigl(P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}C_{P_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}}(M)\bigr)[-1]

in Db​(Penβ€‹βˆ’modgr)D^{b}(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits). Note that the multiplication map Penβ†’PP^{\mathrm{en}}\to P is a split surjection of algebras. We deduce the first and last terms of the sequence of isomorphisms above are actually isomorphic in Db​(Pβ€‹βˆ’modgr)D^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits). This shows the second assertion. The proof of the assertion involving Fsβˆ’1F_{s}^{-1} is similar.

We have k⁑[zs]βŠ—k​[zs]enX≃k⁑[zs]β€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1βŸ©β€‹[1]βŠ•k⁑[zs]k[z_{s}]\otimes_{k[z_{s}]^{\mathrm{en}}}X\simeq k[z_{s}]\langle-1\rangle[1]\oplus k[z_{s}] and the last assertion follows immediately. ∎

0P29

Lemma 5.2. Let s∈Ss\in S. Assume sβˆ‰Z⁑(W)s{\not\in}Z(W). Let L=(VSβˆ–s)βŸ‚βˆ©(Vβˆ—)sL=(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}\cap(V^{*})^{s}, a hyperplane of (VSβˆ–s)βŸ‚=(VSβˆ–s)βˆ—(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}=(V_{S\setminus s})^{*}. We have a commutative diagram of PSβˆ–senP_{S\setminus s}^{\mathrm{en}}-modules where the diagonal map is an isomorphism

ΞΈs\textstyle{\theta_{s}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}aβŠ—b↦a​s​(b)\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}P​s\textstyle{Ps}PSβˆ–sβŠ—S⁑(L)PSβˆ–s\textstyle{P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{S(L)}P_{S\setminus s}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}aβŠ—b↦aβŠ—b\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto a\otimes b}aβŠ—b↦a​s​(b)\scriptstyle{a\otimes b\mapsto as(b)}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}

Here, P​sPs denotes the left PSβˆ–sP_{S\setminus s}-module PP endowed with a right action of a∈PSβˆ–sa\in P_{S\setminus s} by multiplication by s⁑(a)s(a).

0P2A

Proof. We will show that Ο•:PSβˆ–sβŠ—S⁑(L)PSβˆ–sβ†’P,aβŠ—b↦a​s​(b)\phi:P_{S\setminus s}\otimes_{S(L)}P_{S\setminus s}\to P,\ a\otimes b\mapsto as(b) is an isomorphism. It is a morphism of algebras, and a morphism of graded left PSβˆ–sP_{S\setminus s}-modules.

By assumption, there is t∈Sβˆ–st\in S\setminus s such that ms​tβ‰ 2m_{st}\not=2, so that s⁑(Ξ±t)βˆ’Ξ±ts(\alpha_{t})-\alpha_{t} is a non-zero multiple of Ξ±s\alpha_{s}. It follows that ϕ⁑(Ξ±tβŠ—1βˆ’1βŠ—Ξ±t)∈k×​αs\phi(\alpha_{t}\otimes 1-1\otimes\alpha_{t})\in k^{\times}\alpha_{s}. Since Vβˆ—=(VSβˆ–s)βŸ‚βŠ•k​αsV^{*}=(V^{S\setminus s})^{\perp}\oplus k\alpha_{s}, we have P=PSβˆ–sβŠ—k⁑[Ξ±s]P=P_{S\setminus s}\otimes k[\alpha_{s}] and we deduce that Ο•\phi is surjective.

Since Ο•\phi is a morphism of graded free left PSβˆ–sP_{S\setminus s}-modules with the same graded ranks 1+t+t2+β‹―1+t+t^{2}+\cdots, we deduce that Ο•\phi is an isomorphism. ∎

0P2B

Remark 5.3. While we do not expect the category of Soergel bimodules to exist for complex reflection groups, we hope that its homotopy category does exist, as well as the 22-braid group. This would be a starting point for a structural approach to the construction of unipotent data in Broué–Malle–Michel’s theory of spets [BroMaMi].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

RaphaΓ«l Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1