ScalingStacks

3. 22-braid groups

3.1. Braid groups

Let (W,S)(W,S) be a finite Coxeter group. Let VV be the geometric representation of WW over k=𝐂k={\mathbf{C}}: it comes with a basis {es}s∈S\{e_{s}\}_{s\in S}. Given s∈Ss\in S, we denote by Ξ±s\alpha_{s} the linear form on VV such that s⁑(x)βˆ’x=Ξ±s​(x)​ess(x)-x=\alpha_{s}(x)e_{s} for all x∈Vx\in V. The set {Ξ±s}s∈S\{\alpha_{s}\}_{s\in S} is a basis of Vβˆ—V^{*}. Let P=PS=P(W,S)=k⁑[V]P=P_{S}=P_{(W,S)}=k[V] (we will denote by XSX_{S} or X(W,S)X_{(W,S)} a given object constructed from (W,S)(W,S)).

The braid group BS=B(W,S)B_{S}=B_{(W,S)} associated to (W,S)(W,S) is the group generated by {Οƒs}s∈S\{\sigma_{s}\}_{s\in S} with relations

ΟƒsΟƒtΟƒsβ‹―βŸms​t​ terms=ΟƒtΟƒsΟƒtβ‹―βŸms​t​ terms\underbrace{\sigma_{s}\sigma_{t}\sigma_{s}\cdots}_{m_{st}\text{ terms}}=\underbrace{\sigma_{t}\sigma_{s}\sigma_{t}\cdots}_{m_{st}\text{ terms}}

for any s,t∈Ss,t\in S such that the order ms​tm_{st} of s​tst is finite.

We denote by l:BS→𝐙l:B_{S}\to{\mathbf{Z}} the length function. It is the morphism of groups defined by l⁑(Οƒs)=1l(\sigma_{s})=1 for s∈Ss\in S.

3.2. Lift

Let us recall, following [Rou1], how to lift in a non-trivial way the action of WW on the derived category D⁑(P)D(P) to an action of BSB_{S} on the homotopy category Ho⁑(P)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P).

Let s∈Ss\in S. We put

ΞΈs=PβŠ—PsP​ and ​Fs=0β†’ΞΈsβ€‹βŸ¨1βŸ©β†’π‘šP⁑⟨1βŸ©β†’0.\theta_{s}=P\otimes_{P^{s}}P\text{ and }F_{s}=0\to\theta_{s}\langle 1\rangle\xrightarrow{m}P\langle 1\rangle\to 0.

The latter is a complex of graded PenP^{{\mathrm{en}}}-modules, where Pβ€‹βŸ¨1⟩P\langle 1\rangle is in cohomological degree 11 and mm denotes the multiplication map. We put

Fsβˆ’1=0β†’Pβ‘βŸ¨βˆ’1βŸ©β†’a↦a​αsβŠ—1+aβŠ—Ξ±sΞΈsβ†’0.F_{s}^{-1}=0\to P\langle-1\rangle\xrightarrow{a\mapsto a\alpha_{s}\otimes 1+a\otimes\alpha_{s}}\theta_{s}\to 0.

This is a complex of graded PenP^{{\mathrm{en}}}-modules, where Pβ€‹βŸ¨βˆ’1⟩P\langle-1\rangle is in cohomological degree βˆ’1-1.

Let us recall a result of [Rou1, Β§9]. Given i1,…,iri_{1},\ldots,i_{r}, j1,…,jrβ€²βˆˆSj_{1},\ldots,j_{r^{\prime}}\in S and Ξ΄1,…,Ξ΄r\delta_{1},\ldots,\delta_{r}, Ξ΅1,…,Ξ΅rβ€²βˆˆ{Β±1}\varepsilon_{1},\ldots,\varepsilon_{r^{\prime}}\in\{\pm 1\} such that Οƒi1Ξ΄1β‹―ΟƒirΞ΄r=Οƒj1Ξ΅1β‹―Οƒjrβ€²Ξ΅rβ€²\sigma_{i_{1}}^{\delta_{1}}\cdots\sigma_{i_{r}}^{\delta_{r}}=\sigma_{j_{1}}^{\varepsilon_{1}}\cdots\sigma_{j_{r^{\prime}}}^{\varepsilon_{r^{\prime}}}, there is a canonical isomorphism in Ho⁑(Penβ€‹βˆ’modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)

Fi1Ξ΄1βŠ—Pnβ‹―βŠ—PnFirΞ΄rβ†’βˆΌFj1Ξ΅1βŠ—Pnβ‹―βŠ—PnFjrβ€²Ξ΅rβ€²F_{i_{1}}^{\delta_{1}}\otimes_{P_{n}}\cdots\otimes_{P_{n}}F_{i_{r}}^{\delta_{r}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}F_{j_{1}}^{\varepsilon_{1}}\otimes_{P_{n}}\cdots\otimes_{P_{n}}F_{j_{r^{\prime}}}^{\varepsilon_{r^{\prime}}}

and these isomorphisms form a transitive system of isomorphisms.

Given b∈BSb\in B_{S}, we put

Fb=limi1,…,irΞ΅1,…,Ξ΅rb=Οƒi1Ξ΅1β‹―ΟƒirΞ΅rFi1Ξ΅1βŠ—Pβ‹―βŠ—PFirΞ΅r∈Ho(Penβˆ’modgr).F_{b}=\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}i_{1},\ldots,i_{r}\\ \varepsilon_{1},\ldots,\varepsilon_{r}\\ b=\sigma_{i_{1}}^{\varepsilon_{1}}\cdots\sigma_{i_{r}}^{\varepsilon_{r}}\end{subarray}}F_{i_{1}}^{\varepsilon_{1}}\otimes_{P}\cdots\otimes_{P}F_{i_{r}}^{\varepsilon_{r}}\in\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits).

The 22-braid group ℬ(W,S){\mathcal{B}}_{(W,S)} is the full monoidal subcategory of Ho⁑(Penβ€‹βˆ’modgr)\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits(P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits) with objects the FbF_{b}’s, with b∈BSb\in B_{S}.

3.3. Parabolic subgroups

Let IβŠ‚SI\subset S and let WIW_{I} be the subgroup of WW generated by II. Let VI=⨁s∈Ik​esV_{I}=\bigoplus_{s\in I}ke_{s} and PI=k⁑[VI]P_{I}=k[V_{I}]. We have V=VIβŠ•VIV=V_{I}\oplus V^{I}, hence P=PIβŠ—k⁑[VI]P=P_{I}\otimes k[V^{I}]. We deduce also that Vβˆ—=(VI)βŸ‚βŠ•(VI)βŸ‚V^{*}=(V^{I})^{\perp}\oplus(V_{I})^{\perp}, hence the composition of canonical maps (VI)βŸ‚β†ͺVβˆ—β† (VI)βˆ—(V^{I})^{\perp}\hookrightarrow V^{*}\twoheadrightarrow(V_{I})^{*} is an isomorphism. We identify (VI)βŸ‚=⨁s∈Ik​αs(V^{I})^{\perp}=\bigoplus_{s\in I}k\alpha_{s} and (VI)βˆ—(V_{I})^{*} via this isomorphism.

The compositions of canonical maps β‹‚sβˆ‰Iker⁑αsβ†’Vβ†’V/VI\bigcap_{s{\not\in}I}\ker\alpha_{s}\to V\to V/V^{I} and VIβ†’Vβ†’V/VIV_{I}\to V\to V/V^{I} are isomorphisms: this provides an isomorphism VIβ†’βˆΌβ‹‚sβˆ‰Iker⁑αsV_{I}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\bigcap_{s{\not\in}I}\ker\alpha_{s}. We denote by ρI:Pβ† PI\rho_{I}:P\twoheadrightarrow P_{I} the morphism given by the composition VIβ†’βˆΌβ‹‚sβˆ‰Iker⁑αsβ†ͺVV_{I}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\bigcap_{s{\not\in}I}\ker\alpha_{s}\hookrightarrow V.

We have a functor Ξ³I:PIenβ€‹βˆ’Modβ†’Penβ€‹βˆ’Mod\gamma_{I}:P_{I}^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits\to P^{\mathrm{en}}\operatorname{\!-Mod}\nolimits sending MM to k⁑[VI]βŠ—Mk[V^{I}]\otimes M, where k⁑[VI]k[V^{I}] is the regular k​[VI]enk[V^{I}]^{\mathrm{en}}-module and PenP^{\mathrm{en}} is decomposed as Pen=k​[VI]enβŠ—PIenP^{\mathrm{en}}=k[V^{I}]^{\mathrm{en}}\otimes P_{I}^{\mathrm{en}}. We obtain a fully faithful monoidal functor

ℬWI→ℬW,F↦γI​(F)=k⁑[VI]βŠ—F.{\mathcal{B}}_{W_{I}}\to{\mathcal{B}}_{W},\ F\mapsto\gamma_{I}(F)=k[V^{I}]\otimes F.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

RaphaΓ«l Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1